ESTIMATING STUDY SAMPLE SIZE AND ASSESSING RELIABILITY OF PEAK FAT OXIDATION (PFO) DATA (G/MIN) COLLECTED DURING FATMAX TESTS, WITH CONSIDERATION FOR MENSTRUAL CYCLE IN ENDURANCE-TRAINED WOMEN
Abstract
Background: Sample size estimations are completed to determine the number of participants needed to highlight a relevant treatment effect [1]. This is crucial to ensure that the results are reliable. Estimating sample size can also assist researchers by informing the financial outlay for a project and minimising any over spend. Purpose: In this study, different methods to estimate sample size using PFO data were utilised. PFO data collected using the test re-test method was employed to estimate sample size. PFO results from previous research were also applied to estimate sample size [2,3,5,6]. Methods: Subsequently, a group of endurance-trained women (n=5) aged 36 (+/- 2.4 years) were recruited from the main study. Menstrual cycle (MC) length was established and within the MC, the mid-follicular phase (MF) (low hormone phase) was determined [4]. Identifying the MF phase of the MC would allow for FATMAX test re-test’s to be conducted when sex hormones were least likely to change or impose an effect on substrate utilisation. Tests were separated by 24 hours to allow participants to recover, to ensure hormonal change was minimal and to test the reliability of the results collected. Results: Results from previous research were statistically analysed individually and in group form to estimate sample size. When analysing PFO data from previous research, a mean sample estimation of 7 participants was suggested. Test re-test PFO results were assessed for reliability (ICC=0.82) before sample size estimations were conducted. Individual analysis from the test re-test method outlined a mean sample estimation of 14 participants, and group analysis from this method suggested a mean sample estimation of 14 participants. An overall mean sample from all estimations outlined a sample size of 12 participants.
Acknowledgement
The above article was conducted in paralell as a relaibility study for the article titled “Investigsating the effects of hormonal fluctuations associated with menstrual cycle on peak fat oxidation during graded exercise” which was published in a previous edition of the European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, Volume 11, Issue 7. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejep/article/view/5715
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Malone HE, Nicholl H, Coyne I. Fundamentals of estimating sample size. Nurse researcher. 2016 May 18;23(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nr.23.5.21.s5
Achten J, Gleeson M, Jeukendrup AE. Determination of the exercise intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2002 Jan 1;34(1):92-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200201000-00015
Frandsen J, Pistoljevic N, Quesada JP, Amaro-Gahete FJ, Ritz C, Larsen S, Dela F, Helge JW. Menstrual cycle phase does not affect whole body peak fat oxidation rate during a graded exercise test. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2020 Mar 13. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00774.2019
Mihm M, Gangooly S, Muttukrishna S. The normal menstrual cycle in women. Animal reproduction science. 2011 Apr 1;124(3-4):229-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.030
Guttman L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika. 1945 Dec;10(4):255-82. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02288892
Yen M, Lo LH. Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach. Nursing research. 2002 Jan 1;51(1):59-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200201000-00009
Chrzanowski-Smith OJ, Edinburgh RM, Thomas MP, Haralabidis N, Williams S, Betts JA, Gonzalez JT. The day-to-day reliability of peak fat oxidation and FATMAX. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2020 Aug;120(8):1745-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04397-3
Oosthuyse T, Bosch AN. The effect of the menstrual cycle on exercise metabolism: implications for exercise performance in eumenorrhoeic women. Sports medicine. 2010 Mar;40:207-27. https://doi.org/10.2165/11317090-000000000-00000
Schoffelen PF, den Hoed M, van Breda E, Plasqui G. Test‐retest variability of VO2max using total‐capture indirect calorimetry reveals linear relationship of VO2 and Power. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2019 Feb;29(2):213-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13324
Frayn KN. Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. Journal of applied physiology. 1983 Aug 1;55(2):628-34. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1983.55.2.628
Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological reviews. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x
Williams RH, Zimmerman DW. Statistical power analysis and reliability of measurement. The Journal of general psychology. 1989 Oct 1;116(4):359-69. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00221309.1989.9921123
Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General. 2012 Feb;141(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
Özgünen KT, Özdemir Ç, Korkmaz-Eryılmaz S, Kılcı A, Günaştı Ö, Kurdak SS. A Comparison of the maximal fat oxidation rates of three different time periods in the FatMax stage. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2019 Mar;18(1):44. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6370962/
Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in nursing & health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247
Owen Jr JA. Physiology of the menstrual cycle. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1975 Apr 1;28(4):333-8. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500020/
Creinin MD, Keverline S, Meyn LA. How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity. Contraception. 2004 Oct 1;70(4):289-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2004.04.012
Ramirez E. Ovaries and menstruation. Endocrinology. 1924 Mar 1;8(2):243-9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-8-2-243
Nakhuda GS, Li N, Yang Z, Kang SM. Urinary E3g Monitoring with the Mira Fertility Tracker during Coh as an Alternative to Serum E2. Fertility and Sterility. 2022 Oct 1;118(4):e154. Retrieved from https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(22)00971-2/pdf
Bouchard TP, Fehring RJ, Mu Q. Quantitative versus qualitative estrogen and luteinizing hormone testing for personal fertility monitoring. Expert review of molecular diagnostics. 2021 Dec 2;21(12):1349-60. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2021.2000393
Usala SJ, Alliende ME, Trindade AA. Algorithms with area under the curve for daily urinary estrone-3-glucuronide and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide to signal the transition to the luteal phase. Medicina. 2022 Jan 13;58(1):119. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010119
Bouchard TP. Using Quantitative Hormonal Fertility Monitors to Evaluate the Luteal Phase: Proof of Concept Case Study. Medicina. 2023 Jan 10;59(1):140. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010140
Hopkins WG. Calculating the reliability intraclass correlation coefficient and its confidence limits (Excel spreadsheet). http://newstats.org/xICC.xls.
ClinCalc LL. Sample size calculator. Power [cited 1 Mar 2021] Available from: https://clincalc.com/stats/samplesize.aspx. 2019.
Roozbeh B, Mohebbi H. Comparison of different timing effect of carbohydrate intake before exercise on MFO and Fatmax in endurance runners. Sport Physiology. 2017 Jun 22;9(34):147-62. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.22089/spj.2017.2579.1348
Randell RK, Spriet LL. Nutritional factors that affect fat oxidation rates during exercise. Sports Science Exchange. 2020;29(206):1-6. Retrieved from https://www.gssiweb.org/sports-science-exchange/article/nutritional-factors-that-affect-fat-oxidation-rates-during-exercise
Bobak CA, Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ. Estimation of an inter-rater intra-class correlation coefficient that overcomes common assumption violations in the assessment of health measurement scales. BMC medical research methodology. 2018 Dec;18(1):1-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0550-6
Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological reports. 1966 Aug;19(1):3-11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
Aird, T. P., Davies, R. W., & Carson, B. P. (2018). Effects of fasted vs fed-state exercise on performance and post-exercise metabolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13054
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v12i2.5784
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Eoin Molloy, Maria Murphy-Griffin, Michael Harrison
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2015 - 2026. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science (ISSN 2501 - 1235) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All authors who send their manuscripts to this journal and whose articles are published on this journal retain full copyright of their articles. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
