EMPLOYING TELEGRAM APPLICATION: LEARNERS’ ATTITUDE, VOCABULARY LEARNING, AND VOCABULARY DELAYED RETENTION

Fahimeh Esmaeili Mahzoun, Zahra Zohoorian

Abstract


Using smartphones for learning a language has long been recommended by scholars. However, its effectiveness is still the subject of argument. Moreover, due to the limited time in the conventional language classes, students do not have the chance to practice all vocabulary items which may hinder the learning process. Accordingly, a mixed method only-post-test quasi-experimental study was conducted. Also, for the qualitative phase, data were gathered through a focus group interview with the participants chosen through purposive sampling. It was confirmed that there was a significant effect of online practicing on vocabulary learning of the language learners. Furthermore, it was found out that the participants held a positive attitude for practicing target words through Telegram. In addition, the study results showed that using Telegram application does not have a significant effect on the retention of the vocabulary of the learners. From the results of this study, the researcher proposed some pedagogical implications to EFL teachers, practitioners, material developers, policy makers, and other English education stakeholders.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


Telegram, social networking, vocabulary learning, vocabulary retention, attitudes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: Practical Strategies. London: SAGE Publications.

Belanger, Y. (2005). Duke University iPod first year experience final evaluation report. Retrieved from https://cit.duke.edu/pdf/reports/ipod_initiative_04_05.pdf.

Callan, S. (1994, December). Can the use of hand-held personal computers assist transition students to produce written work of excellent quality? Paper presented at the 36th Annual Conference of the Ontario Educational Research Council, Toronto, Ontario.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Method in Education. London: Routledge.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: SAGE.

Day, R., Omura. C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991). Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(2), 541-551.

Duggan, H. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers ‘beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use: a comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 117-128.

Fageeh A., I., (2013). Effects of MALL Applications on Vocabulary Acquisition and Motivation. AWEJ, 4(4), 420-447.

Gass, S. (1999). Discussion: Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 319-333.

Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197-213.

Isisag, K. U. (2012, November). The positive effects of integrating ICT in foreign language teaching: Paper presented at the ICT for Language Learning conference. Florence, Italy.

Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 767-787.

Koohang, A. (2009). A learner-centered model for blended learning design. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(1), 76-91.

Kromer, F., & Kuntner, A. (2010). Motivation and problem statement. Retrieved from: www.tuwien.ac.ir

Krueger, R. A. (1998a). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. CA: Sage

Krueger, R. A. (1998b). Developing questions for focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Krueger, R. A. (1998c). Moderating focus groups. CA: Sage.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2006). Researching new and emerging technologies in language education. Unpublished presentation to internal Open University, UK intellect research group.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2007). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.

Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Leontev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Leontev, A.A. (1981). Psychology and the Language Learning Process. Oxford: Pergamon.

Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515-525.

Malmir, P., & Rajabi. P. (2016). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Text Messaging by Social Networks on Vocabulary Comprehension of Iranian Upper-Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(7), 139-152.

McCarty, S. (2005). Spoken internet to go: Popularization through podcasting. JALT CALL Journal, 1(2), 67-74.

Mitchel, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2010). Research design explained. Belmont: Cengage Learning.

Nation, I. S. P. (2005) Vocabulary learning through extensive reading. In G. Poedjosoedarmo (ed.) Innovative Approaches to Reading and Writing (pp. 10-21). Singapore: RELC Anthology Series.

Nourbakhsh, M. (2017). On the effect of using Memrise Application in Iranian Intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and attitude (Unpublished master's thesis).Islamic Azad University, Mashhad.

O’Bryan, A., & Hegellieimer, V. (2007). Integrating CALL into the classroom: The role of podcasting in an ESL listening strategies course. ReCALL, 19(2), 162-180.

Rajayi, S., & Poorahmadi, M. (2017). The impact of teaching vocabulary through “Kik” application on improving intermediate EFL learner’s vocabulary learning. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 22-28.

Saragi, T., Nation, P., & Meister, G. (1978). Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 6, 72-80.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.

Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT Journal, 49(2), 133–143.

Stanley, G. (2006). Podcasting: Audio on the internet comes of age. TESL-EJ, 9(4), 1-7.

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.

Suchman, L. (2006). Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thornton P., & Houser, C. (2005) Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21, 217–228.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.

Zamani, B. E., & Mohammadzadeh, S. (2013). The role of online social networks for learning English based on university students. In C. Tafazoli & S., Chirimbu (Eds.), Language & Technology: Computer Assisted Language Learning (pp. 142-150). Tehran: Khate Sefid Press.

Zarei, R., Heidari D. L., & Ameri-Golestan, A. (2017). Effect of Telegram Application on Iranian Advanced EFL Learners' Vocabulary Knowledge and Attitude. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(5). 96-109.

Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Turkish Online Journal on Educational Technology, 10(3), 203-214.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).