Nasim Nourbakhsh, Majid Pourmohammadi


This research tried to compare the probable effects of two different kinds of corrective feedback (explicit and implicit) on Iranian elementary EFL learners' paragraph writing ability. The participants were 30 English elementary foreign language learners who were studying EFL at Iran Language Institute (ILI) in Lahijan, Iran. They were all native speakers of Persian. The study groups both included girls aged 12 to 14. In order to make sure that all the participants were at the same English proficiency level, Face to Face Written Placement Test was organized. The pretest-posttest nonequivalent-groups design which is a subcategory of quasi-experimental designs was utilized in this study. Each group included 15 participants. All of the participants in each group have expected to write a paragraph as the pretest and after treatment sessions they were required to write another paragraph as the posttest of writing. The findings showed the superiority of explicit feedback over implicit feedback during the procedure of the research.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



explicit feedback, implicit feedback, paragraph writing

Full Text:



Ammar A., Spada N., 2006. One Size Fits all? Recasts, Prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(4): 543-574.

Bitchener J., Knoch U., 2010a. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics 31(2): 193-214.

Brown H. D., 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.), New York, Pearson Longman, USA

Chandler J., 2003. The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(3): 267-296.

Chen J., Lin J., Jiang L., 2016. Corrective Feedback in SLA: Theoretical Relevance and Research. Canadian Center of Science and Educating, doi:10.5539/elt.v9n11p85

Ellis R., Sheen Y., 2006. Reexamining the Role of Recasts in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, doi:10.1017/S027226310606027X

Ellis R., 2008. The study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, Oxford University.

Ellis R., 2008. A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT Journal 63(2) : 97-107.

Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakami M., Takashima H., 2008. The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context. System 36: 353-371.

Ferris D. R., Roberts B. 2001. Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161-184.

Ferris D. R., Hedgcock J. S., 2005. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice, Abingdon, Routledge

Ferris D. R., 2006. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

Ferris D. R., 2010. Second Writing Research and Written Feedback in SLA: Intersectional and Practical Applications, doi: 10.1017/S0272263109990490

Hyland K., Annan E., 2006. Teachers’ Perceptions of Error: The Effects of First Language and Experience, doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.001

Hyland K., Hyland F., 2006. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and Issues, New York, Cambridge University Press

Panova I., Lyster R., 2002. Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4): 573-595.

Russell J. Spada N., 2006. The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback for the Acquisition of L2 Grammar, doi: 10.1075/lllt.13.09val

Sheen Y., 2007. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly 41: 255-283.

Truscott J., 2004. Evidence and Conjecture on the Effects of Correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13: 337-343.

Truscott J., 2007. The Effect of Error Correction on Learners' Ability to Write Accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16(4): 255-272.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).