RECEPTIVE VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN CLIL INSTRUCTION

Dilsah Kalay

Abstract


Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has recently attracted the attention of practitioners in the language teaching field. As the name suggests, CLIL is an approach built upon teaching content-based area through a language as a medium. For such a language learning process, one of the important language aspects is vocabulary. The number of words language learners know - vocabulary size - and how well they know those words - vocabulary depth - (overall, the receptive dimension of word knowledge) are crucial foci to consider in language learning. Therefore, the primary concern of the present study is to examine the effects of the CLIL approach on the receptive vocabulary knowledge of university students in a state university. Accordingly, Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) by Schmitt, Schmitt and Clapham (2001) and Word Association Test (WAT) by Read (2000) are administered to the participants before and after CLIL treatment. The findings indicated that the subjects’ size of vocabulary knowledge has significantly differed with CLIL instruction in time, which means that CLIL instruction has been found to be successful for developing both general and academic vocabulary knowledge. Similarly, an increase in the depth of vocabulary knowledge of participants alongside with the CLIL instruction has been observed, indicating that participants’ quality of vocabulary knowledge evaluated through WAT seems to have improved with CLIL treatment. Further research including less frequent words as well as the productive aspect of word knowledge might shed light on the impacts of CLIL treatment on vocabulary development of language learners, especially university students.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


CLIL; receptive vocabulary knowledge; size; depth

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustín Llach, M. P. (2009). The role of Spanish L1 in the vocabulary use of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 112-129). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Agustín-Llach, M. P. & Canga Alonso, A. (2014). Vocabulary Growth in Young CLIL and Traditional EFL Learners: Evidence from Research and Implications for Education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1111/ijal.12090

Aziez, F. (2011). Examining the Vocabulary Levels of Indonesia’s English National Examination Texts. Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 51, 1-14.

Canga Alonso, A. (2013a). Receptive Vocabulary Size of Secondary Spanish EFL Learners. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, Vol. 8, 2013, 66-75, EISSN 1886-6298. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1180

Canga Alonso, A. (2013b). The Receptive Vocabulary of Spanish 6th-Grade Primary-School Students in CLIL Instruction: A Preliminary Study. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 6(2), 22-41. doi:10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.2, EISSN 2322-9721.

Canga Alonso, A. & Arribas Garcia, M. (2013). Productive Vocabulary Knowledge of Spanish EFL Learners. Revista Electrónica De Lingüística Aplicada (ISSN 1885-9089), 2014, Número 1, páginas: 39-56.

Canga Alonso, A. (2015). Receptive Vocabulary of CLIL and Non-CLIL Primary and Secondary School Learners. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 2015, vol. 23, 59-77.

Castellano Risco, I., O. (2015). How a CLIL Approach May Affect the Size of Receptive Vocabulary and the Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies: An Empirical Study Focused on Extremaduran Secondary Learners. MA Thesis in Badajoz, 2014/2015.

Celaya, M. Luz & Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe (2010). First languages and age in CLIL and non-CLIL contexts. International CLIL Research Journal, 1.3. http://www.icrj.eu/13/article6.html (Accessed November 6 2015).

Cenoz, J., Genesee, F. and D. Gorter (2013). Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Applied Linguistics, 13: 1-21.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In Werner Delanoy and Laurenz Volkmann, eds., 139-157.

Darn, S. (2006a). CLIL: A Way Forward for Turkey. INGED News Online, Issue 1, 05.06.

Darn, S. (2006b). CLIL: A European Overview. INGED News Online, Issue 2, 06. 06.

Ehsanzadeh, I., S. (2012). Depth versus Breadth of Lexical Repertoire: Assessing Their Roles in EFL Students’ Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL Du Canada, Vol. 29, No 2, Spring 2012.

Fan, M. (2000). How Big is the Gap and How to Narrow it? An Investigation into Active and Passive Vocabulary Knowledge of Learners. RELC Journal, Vol. 31(2), pp. 105-119.

Fernández, D. J. (2009). CLIL at the university level: Relating language teaching with and through content teaching. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 10-26. doi:10.5294/laclil.2009.2.2.11

Fontecha, A., F. (2014). Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge and Motivation in CLIL and EFL. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, Vol. 9, 2014, 23-32. EISSN 1886-6298. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2014.2077.

Hellman, A., B. (2011). Vocabulary Size and Depth of Word Knowledge in Adult-Onset Second Language Acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2011.

Ho, Ming-Ju, A. & Lien, Hsin-Yi (2011). The Correlation between Vocabulary Knowledge Depth and Reading Comprehension. DHU-TESOL Research Institute, Journal 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.tesolreview.org/down/Ming.pdf.

Jiménez Catalán, R. M., Ruiz de Zarobe Y., & Cenoz, J. (2006). Vocabulary Profiles in English as a Subject and as a Vehicular Language. VIEWZ, 15(3), 23-27. Retrieved from http://anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_anglist/weitere_Uploads/Views/views15_3_clil_special.pdf

Jiménez, R. M., & Terrazas, M. (2008). The receptive vocabulary of EFL young learners. Journal of English Studies, 5-6, 173-191.

Jiménez Catalán, R. M. & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2009). The Receptive Vocabulary of EFL Learners in Two Instructional Contexts: CLIL versus non-CLIL. In R. Mª Jiménez Catalán & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 81-92). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.

Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments. Springer.

Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K. & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and Strength: Do We Need Both to Measure Vocabulary Knowledge?. Language Testing, 21 (2): 201 - 226.

Laufer, B. & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength and Computer Adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54 (3), 399 - 436.

Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16(1), 33-51.

Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). The Relationship Between Passive and Active Vocabularies: Effects of Language Learning Context. Language Learning, 48, 365-391.

Marsh, D. (2000). Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages; An Introduction to CLIL for Parents and Young People, TIE-CLIL. Available at http://www.tieclil.org/HTML/productsE.html.

Meara, P., M., & Olmos Alcoy, J. C. (2010). Words as Species: An Alternative Approach to Estimating Productive Vocabulary Size. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 222–236.

Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S., A. & Kian, P. (2011). The Relationship between Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension among Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, No.222, Year: 53/Autumn-Winter, 2011.

Merikivi, R., & Pietilä, P. (2014). Vocabulary in CLIL and in Mainstream Education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 487-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.3.487-497.

Moreno Espinosa, S. (2009) ‘Young Learners’ L2 word association responses in two different learning contexts’, in Content and Language Integrated Learning in Europe. In Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments. Springer.

Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary: Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rashidi, N. & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the Role of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108

Read, J. (2000a). Word Associates Test, retrieved from www.lextutor.ca. In March, 2014.

Read, J. (2000b). Assessing Vocabulary, Cambridge: CUP.

Read, J. & Chapelle, C., A. (2001). A Framework for Second Language Vocabulary Assessment, Language Testing, 18 (1), pp. 1-32.

Richards, J. and Schmidt, R. (eds.) Language and Communication. London: Longman.

Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, Vol 1 (1) 2008.

Schmitt, N. (1997). ‘Vocabulary learning strategies.’ In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy, (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, pp. 199-227. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and Exploring the Behaviour of Two New Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18 (1): pp. 55-88.

Schmitt, N., Ching, Ng, J. W & Garras, J. (2010). The Word Association Format: Validation Evidence. Language Testing, Online, pp. 1-22.

Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary in Relation to L1/L2 Acquisition and Frequency of Input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217-34.

Webb, S. (2005). Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Learning: The Effects of Reading and Writing on Word Knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27: 33-52.

Xanthou, M. (2010). Current Trends in L2 Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. Is CLIL the right approach? In A. Psaltou-Joycey & M Mattheoudakis (Eds.), 14th International Conference: Advances in Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching – Selected Papers (pp. 459-471). Thessaloniki, Greece: Greek Applied Linguistics Association (GALA). Retrieved from http://www.enl.auth.gr/gala/14th/Papers/English%20papers/Xanthou.pdf.

Yuksel, I. & Durmusoglu Kose, G. (2013). ‘ELT Majors' Cross Sectional Evaluation of Academic Lexical Competence and Performance’. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 244 - 252, March 2013.

Zareva, A. (2005). Models of Lexical Knowledge Assessment of Second Language Learners of English of Higher Levels of Language Proficiency. System, 33: 547-562.

Zhou, S. (2010). Comparing Receptive and Productive Academic Vocabulary Knowledge of Chinese EFL Learners. Asian Social Science, Vol. 6, No. 10. pp. 14-19.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i3.3527

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching (ISSN 2537-1754) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).