Katerina Nikolakopoulou, Gerasimos Koustourakis, Vassilis Komis, Konstantinos Ravanis


The views on the integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in education move towards various approaches regarding the aims and/or the nature of computerization that could be adopted in the Greek curricula, during the period 1984-2006, in which the most important curricular reforms related to this integration were completed. By employing the methodological tool of Aviram & Tami, this research carries out a quantitative and qualitative analysis of texts published in the Greek scientific Journal “Contemporary Education” and studies the discourse formulated about the integration of ICT in Greek Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education. This analysis attempts to distinguish and “map” the different approaches expressed by the articles' authors on this integration. The research results revealed a strong tendency of Greek STEM education to attach primarily didactic and administrative approaches to ICT integration leading to micro level changes. It is quite interesting that – during the time period of this study - none of authors' approaches were adopted a systemic view, in the direction of extensive changes in the Greek educational system, in order to facilitate the integration of ICT in STEM education.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



ICT in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics education, discourse, approaches in ICT

Full Text:



Aaron, M., Dicks, D., Ives C., & Montgomery, B. (2004). Planning for integrating teaching technologies. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(2). Retrieved from

Apple, M. W. (2001). Modernization and conservatism in Education. Athens: Metaichmio.

Aviram, A. (1993). Personal autonomy and the flexible school. International Review of Education, 39(5), 419-433.

Aviram, A. (2000). From “computers in the classroom” to mindful radical adaptation by education systems to the emerging cyber culture. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 331-352.

Aviram, R., & Tami, D. (2004). The impact of ICT on education: the three opposed paradigms. The lacking discourse. Retrieved from

Aviram, A. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open, Distance & E-Learning, 1. Retrieved from

Baylor, A., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Journal of Computers & Education, 39(1), 395-414.

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. New York-Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Bernstein, B. (1991). Pedagogical Codes and Social Control. Athens: Alexandria.

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control. Theoretical studies towards a Sociology of language (V. 1). London: Routledge.

Boilevin, J.-M., & Ravanis, K. (2007). L’éducation scientifique et technologique à l’école obligatoire face à la désaffection: recherches en didactique, dispositifs et références. Skholê, HS(1), 5-11.

Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 28-36.

Cuban, L. (1989). Neoprogressive visions and organizational realities. Harvard Educational Review, 59(2), 217-222.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Davis, N., Desforges, C., Jessel, J., Somekh, B., Taylor, C., & Vaughan, G. (1997). Can quality in learning be enhanced through the use of IT? In B. Somekh & N. Davis (Eds), Using IT effectively in teaching and learning: studies in pre-service and in-service teacher education (pp. 14-27). London: Routledge.

Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2006). Teachers’ developing ‘practical theories’ of the contribution of information and communication technologies to subject teaching and learning: an analysis of cases from English secondary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 459-480.

Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2005). Design principles for the support of modelling and collaboration in a technology based learning environment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 15(1/2), 30-55.

Ergazaki, M., Zogza, V., & Komis, V. (2007). Analyzing students’ shared activity while modelling a biological process in a computer-supported educational environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 158-168.

Ezziane, Z. (2007). Information Technology literacy: implications on teaching and learning. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 175-191.

Fisher, C., Dwyer, D. C., & Yocam, K. (Eds). (1996). Education and technology: reflections on computing in classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: an introduction. Hammonsworth: Penguin.

Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds), The Foucault Effect: studies in governmentality (pp. 53-72). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fullan, M. G. (1992). Successful Improvement. Bristol: OUP.

Gao, P., Wong, A. L., Choy, D., & Wu, J. (2010). Developing leadership potential for technology integration: perspectives of three beginning teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(5), 643-658.

Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.

Goodson, I. Knobel, M. Lankshear, C., & Mangan, M. (2002). Cyber spaces/social spaces: culture clash in computerized classrooms. England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.

Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers' beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149- 173.

Jimoyiannis, A., & Siorenta, A. (2007). Modelling as a tool for developing critical and creative thinking. In V. Koulaidis (Ed.), Modern teaching approaches for the development of critical-creative thinking for Secondary Education (pp. 241-267). Athens: Teacher Education Organization.

Jones, D., & Ball, S. (1994). Michel Foucault and the Discourse of Education. In J. Solomon & G. Kouzelis (Eds), Discipline and Knowledge (pp. 169-178). Athens: E.M.E.A.

Kampeza, M., & Ravanis, K. (2009). Transforming the representations of preschool-age children regarding geophysical entities and physical geography. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 3(1), 141-158.

Kommers, P., & Simmerling, M. (2005). ICTs for Secondary Education. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.

Koustourakis, G. (2007). The new educational policy for the reform of the curriculum and the change of school knowledge in the case of Greek compulsory education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(1/2), 131-146.

Koustourakis, G. (2011). The Publishing Organization of School Textbooks and the production of school knowledge during Metaxian period: a historical – sociological approach. In S. Bouzakis (Ed.), Panorama of the History of Education. Views and Opinions (Volume B: Modern Greek Education 1821-2010, pp. 629-647). Athens: Gutenberg.

Koustourakis, G., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2008). ICT in the Primary Education: effects and problems from the effort of its application in pedagogical act. In V. Komis (Ed.), 4th Pan-Hellenic Conference. Teaching Informatics (pp. 425-434). Patras: New Technologies Publications.

Koustourakis, G., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2010). Moving towards the new school of ICT. An interdisciplinary approach. In A. Tzimoyiannis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation - “ICT in Education”. (V. ΙΙ, pp. 581-592). Corinth: University of Peloponnese.

Kripendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Mabejane, M. R., & Ravanis, K. (2018). Linking teacher coursework training, pedagogies, methodologies and practice in schools for the undergraduate science education student teachers at the National University of Lesotho. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 3(2), 67-87.

Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance: an explorative study into the organizational culture of secondary schools and their effects. Twente: Twente University Press.

Miller, A. (2001). Reaching across the divide: the challenges of using the Internet to bridge disparities in access to information. First Monday, 6(10). Retrieved from

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principle and standards for school Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

Nawaz, A. (2014). Investigating the change management for implementing e-learning projects in higher education. Global Journal of Management and Social Science Research, 2(1), 14-24.

Nikolakopoulou, Κ., Koustourakis, G., Komis, V., & Ravanis, K. (2016). The discourse for the integration of ICT in STEM education: attitudes expressed in texts on education in Greece (1984-2006). Journal of Subject Didactics, 1(2), 67-81.

Ntalakoura, V., & Ravanis, K. (2014). Changing preschool children’s representations of light: a scratch based teaching approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 191-200.

Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism versus technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22-30.

Ravanis, K. (2005). Les Sciences Physiques à l’école maternelle: éléments théoriques d’un cadre sociocognitif pour la construction des connaissances et/ou le développement des activités didactiques. International Review of Education, 51(2/3), 201-218.

Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Boubleday.

Tee, M. Y., & Lee, S. S. (2011). From socialisation to internalisation: cultivating technological pedagogical content knowledge through problem-based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 89-104.

Tinio, V. L. (2002). ICT in education. Retrieved from

Tondeur, J. Braak, V. J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Curricula and the use of ICT in education: two words apart? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 962-976.

Tondeur, J., Keer, V. H., Braak, V. J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212-223.

Twining, P. (2002). Enhancing the impact of investments in ‘educational’ ICT. Doctoral Dissertation, The Open University. U.K.: Milton Keynes.

Tzavara A., & Komis V. (2015) Design and implementation of educational scenarios with the integration of TDCK: a case study at a Department of Early Childhood Education. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds), Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 209-224). Boston, MA: Springer.

Underwood, J., & Dillon, G. (2004). Capturing complexity through maturity modelling. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 213-225.

Vorvilas, G. Karalis, T., & Ravanis, K. (2011). Designing Learning Objects: a genre-based approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(2), 114-126.

Willcocks, L. P. (2006). Michel Foucault in the social study of ICTs. Social Science Computer Review, 24(3), 274-295.

Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000) Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307- 320.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).