Kyrgios Nikolaos, Olga Tzafea, Theodoros Thanos


This article focuses on digital skills competence of students in higher education. It is considered to be one of the most prominent scientific research topics in recent decades since it leads to the digital divide. Based on the theory of Bourdieu, this research describes quantitative data with the aim to investigate the presence of the digital divide in higher education. The findings show that the students’ socioeconomic status influences the level of skills development. The relationship between SES and students’ skills shows the presence of the digital divide in higher education that increases learning inequalities. It concludes that the bridging of the digital divide has to be a priority for policies in order to implement new digital teaching and learning processes at all levels of education. New practices also have to be applied in higher education institutions and support students digitally promoting them to acquire sufficient skills and to make more effective use of the Internet.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



higher education, Internet use, digital skills, digital divide

Full Text:



Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy. In C. Lankshear and M. Knobel (Eds.) Digital Literacies, Concepts, Policies and Practices (pp. 17-32). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

Bourdieu, P., (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson J (ed.) Handbook of Theory & Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241-258.

Brand, J.E., Todhunter, S., & Jervis, J. (2017). Digital Australia Report 2018. Eveleigh, NSW: Interactive Games and Entertainment Association (IGEA).

Buzzetto-Hollywood, N., Elobaid, M., & Elobeid, M. (2018). Addressing Information Literacy and the Digital Divide in Higher Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 14(1), 77-93.

Castells, M. (2001). Virtual communities or network society. The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, & society, 116-136.

Castells, M. (2001α). The Internet Galaxy: Reactions on the Internet.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Μεθοδολογία εκπαιδευτικής έρευνας. Αθήνα: Μεταίχμιο

DiMaggio P., E. Hargittai, C. Celeste, S. Shafer, S.. (2004). From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use: A Literature Review & Agenda for Research on Digital Inequality. In K. Neckerman (ed) Social Inequality, 355-400, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

Emmision, Μ. & J. Frow. (1998). Information Technology as Cultural Capital. Australian Universities’ Review, 3(1): 41-45.

Gilster, P. (1997). (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley.

Gouga, G. and Kamarianos I. (2007). Exploring the digital gap: technology, culture and society. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society 3(4): 75-80.

Howard, P.N., Busch, L., & Sheets, P. (2010). Comparing digital divides: Internet access and social inequality in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35(1).

Jimoyiannis A. & Komis V.. (2007) Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development 11(2):149-173.

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671-696.

Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Franko, W. W. (2012). Digital cities: The Internet and the geography of opportunity. Oxford University Press.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2001). Understanding the digital divide. Paris: OECD.

Osterman, M. D. (2012). Digital literacy: Definition, theoretical framework, and competencies. In M. S. Plakhotnik, S. M. Nielsen, & D. M. Pane (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference (pp. 135-141). Miami: Florida International University. Retrieved from:

Peña-López, I. (2010). Framing the digital divide in higher education. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 7(1).

Robinson, L. (2009). A Taste for the Necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society 12(4): 488-507.

Santos, R., Azevedo, J., & Pedro, L. (2013). Digital divide in higher education students’ digital literacy. In European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 178-183). Springer, Cham.

Tondeur J., Sinnaeve I., Van Houte V. & Van Braak J. (2010), ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status & the computer-use profile of young people, New media & Society, 13(1) 151–168.

Tondeur, J., Devos G., Van Houtte M., Van Braak, J., & Valcke M., (2009). Understanding organisational & cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: The case of ICT integration. Educational Studies 35(2): 223-35.

Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A & Peters A., (2011). Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, & hours online to medium- & content-related Internet skills. Poetics 39(2): 125-144.

Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills & the digital divide. New media & society, 13(6), 893-911.

Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2008). The digital divide in Europe. The handbook of Internet politics.

Van Dijk, J. A., (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.

Van Dijk, J., (2006). Digital divide research, achievements & shortcomings. Poetics 34(4/5): 221-35.

Van Dijk, J., & Van Deursen, A., (2009). Inequalities of Digital Skills & How to Overcome Them. In: Ferro E,

Van Dijk. J., & Hacker. K., (2003). The digital divide as a complex & dynamic phenomenon. Information Society 19(4): 315-26.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).