Rachid Elaasri, Abdelmajid Bouziane


The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which the online courses on ENT (l’Espace Numérique de Travail) (digital working space) comply with the Quality Matters (QM) rubrics. The study used the QM standards, an internationally recognized, research based, and peer-review process designed to certify the quality of online and hybrid courses. For an online course to qualify as a QM course, it must contain specific components in its overall design. The results revealed that none of the seven ENT platform online courses passed the Quality Matters review. However, four courses scored fairly good overall in terms of total points. The study findings suggest that while the quality of the course-based standards was fairly high, the course design quality was low.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



ENT, online education, course design course quality, quality matters standards

Full Text:



Amer, S. (2016). Approving an Online C++ Introductory Programing Course via Quality Matters through Informal Reviewers. Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), 2016 International Conference On, 344–349. IEEE.

Kreie, J., & Bussmann, S. (2015). Course Redesign Based on the Quality Matters Program: Examples of Before and After. Information Systems Education Journal, 13(6), 109–122.

Lowenthal, P., & Hodges, C. (2015). In search of quality: Using Quality Matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5).

Marlos Varonis, E. (2014). Most courses are not born digital: An overview of the Quality Matters peer review process for online course design. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 31(4), 217–229.

Martin, F., Ndoye, A., & Wilkins, P. (2016). Using Learning Analytics to Enhance Student Learning in Online Courses Based on Quality Matters Standards. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(2), 165–187.

Proactech. (2012). 1er Baromètre du e-Learning au Maroc... - Google Scholar., p. 35.

QM Publisher Rubric. (2015). Higher Ed Course Design Rubric | Quality Matters. Retrieved from

Sun, J., & de la Rosa, R. (2015). Faculty Training and Student Perceptions: Does Quality Matter? Internet Learning.

van Harmelen, M., Workman, D., & Ltd, H. (2012). Vol.1, No. 3. Analytics for Learning and Teaching. Vol.1(3), 41.

Woods Jr, D. R. (2014). Applying the Quality Matters (QM)(TM) Rubric to improve online business course materials. Research in Higher Education Journal, 23, 1.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2016-2023. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).