Emmanuel K. Oppong, Isaac Asare, Joseph Parker, Francis Quansah


The study investigated the attitude of teacher trainees towards the study of science in the Colleges of Education in Ghana. It looked at the students’ attitude from four main perspectives; their motivation (encouragement) to learn science, their interest (enjoyment) in science lessons, their level of involvement (participation) in science lessons, and the type of interpersonal relationship that exist between them and their science tutors. A twenty (20) - item questionnaire on a five-point Likert-type scale for students was used to collect data on students’ attitude towards science. The respondents consisted of one hundred and fifty (150) students from the Colleges of Education in Ghana, namely Foso College of Education, Enchi College of Education, and Komenda College of Education. The attitude of the students was determined by descriptive analysis by calculating the average (mean) score (X/N) for each dimension (i.e., sum score of items under a dimension, X divided by the total number of responded items, N for dimension). Since attitude students have towards science are influential in determining their performance in science, this study hoped to find out the extent to which students in the selected colleges of education possess the four positive attitudes measured in this study. The result produced indicated that the students possessed none of the positive attitudes towards the study of science.


attitude, dimension, motivation, involvement, interpersonal

Full Text:



Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1996). Science Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA’s TIMSS. Chestnut. Hill MA: Boston College.

Baúdaú, E. & Kirisçioglu, S. (2006). Active learning and hands-on method and applications by making simple devices in science teaching. 7th National Natural Science and Mathematics Education Conference. Gazi University, Ankara

Baúdaú, E. & Kiriúçioglu, S. (2007). We don’t explain science, we have it made. International Workshop on Science. Çanakkale, Turkey

Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98.

Chuang, H. F., & Cheng, Y. J. (2002). The relationships between attitudes toward science and related variables of junior high school students. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 10, (1), 1-20

Blalock, C. L., Lichtenstein, M., Owen, S., Pruski, L., Marshall, C., & Toepperwein, M. (2008). In Pursuit of Validity: A comprehensive review of science attitude Instruments 1935-2005. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (7), 961- 977.

Dweck C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.

Education Policies Commission. (1962). Education and the spirit of science. Education Policies Commission.

Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science. Studies in Science Education, 2, 1-41.

Gauld, C. F., & Huskins, A. A. (1980). Scientific attitudes: a review. Studies in Science Education, 7, 1-41.

Gogolin, L. & Swartz, F. (1992). A quantitative and qualitative inquiry into the attitudes toward. science of nonscience college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 4, 487-504.

Hidi, S. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated. Review of Educational Research, 7, 151-179.

House of Commons (2002). Science Education from 14-19: third report of session 2001-02. Volume 1: Report and Proceedings of the Committee. London: The Stationery Office.

Jovanovic, J., & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35,477- 496.

Keeves, J. P. (1975). The home, the school, and achievement in mathematics and science. Science Education, 59, 439- 460

Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. McGraw-Hill.

Kurt, ù. & Akdeniz, A. R. (2002). Application of work sheets developed about the subject of energy in physics teaching, 5th National Natural Sciences and Mathematics Education Congress, ODTÜ, Ankara.

Kyle, W. C. (1988). What Research Says...About Hands-on Science. ERIC: EJ371095.

Lightbody, P., & Durndell, A. (1996b). The masculine image of careers in science and technology-fact or fantasy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66,231-246.

Lyons, T. (2006). Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students‟ experiences of School science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (6), 591–613.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Science achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, EJ., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International Science Report Findings from IEA's Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2001). Pupils’ attitudes, perceptions, and understanding of primary science: comparisons between Northern Irish and English schools. Paper, presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, England.

Murphy, C., Ambusaidi, A., & Beggs, J. (2006). Middle East meets West: Comparing children’s attitudes to school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 405–422.

Mihladiz, G., Duran, M. & Dogan, A. (2011). Examining primary school students’ attitude Toward science in terms of gender, class level, and income level. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2582-2588.

Mogari, D. (2003). A relationship between attitude and achievement in Euclidean geometry of grade 10 pupils. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7, 63-72.

Myers, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environment and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29,929-937.

OECD (2006). PISA 2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World. Paris: OECD.

Ormerod, M. (1971). The ‘social implications’ factor in attitudes to science. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 41,335-338.

Ornstein, A. (2006). The Frequency of hands-on experimentation and student attitudes toward science: a statistically significant relation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(3), 285-297.

Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and Parents’ Views of the School Science Curriculum. King’s College London.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitude towards science: a review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049- 1079.

Papanastasiou, E. C. & Zembylas, M. (2002). The effect of attitudes on science achievement: a study conducted among high school pupils in Cyprus, International Review of Education, 48, 6, 469-484.

Paris, S. G. (1998). Situated motivation and informal learning. Journal or Museum Education, 22, 22-26.

Piburn, M. D. (1993). If I were the teacher – Qualitative study of attitude towards science. Science Education, 77,393-406.

Scantlebury, K., Boone, W., Kahle J. B. & Fraser, B. J. (2001). Design, validation, and use of an 6, evaluation instrument for monitoring systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 646-662.

Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of the major influences on attitudes towards an achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 7, 1-18.

Schreiner, C. & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth's identity construction -two incompatible projects? In Corrigan, D., Dillon, J. & Gunstone, R. (Eds.), The Re-emergence of Values in the Science Curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Sjøberg, S. (2002). Science for the children? Report from the Science and Scientist -project. Acta Didactica, 1/2002, Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.

Sundberg, M. D., Dini, M. L., & Li, E. (1994). Decreasing course content improves student comprehension of science and attitudes towards science in freshman biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31,679-693.

Tilger, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74, 421- 442.

Walberg, H. J., Fraser, B. J. & Welch, W. (1986). A test of a model of educational productivity among junior high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 23, 699-706.

Wallace. (1996). Engaging with learning. In J. Rudduck (Ed.), School Improvement: What Can Pupils Tell Us? David Fulton.

Weinburgh, M. H. (1995). Gender Differences in Student Attitudes toward Science: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32,387-398

Whitefield, R. C. (1980). Educational research and science teaching. School Science Review, 60,411-430.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015-2022. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).