ASSESSMENT OF MODERN DIGITAL LEARNING TOOLS IN PROMOTING ADULT LEARNING IN LITERACY CLASSES IN PORT HARCOURT METROPOLIS, NIGERIA

Chidinma Dokubo, Helen Akpama Adong, Patience Uwelegbewe Orgwu

Abstract


This study examined modern digital learning tools for promoting adult learning literacy classes in Port Harcourt Metropolis. The study was guided by three research questions with a population of 2033 adult learners and facilitators in adult literacy centres in the Port Harcourt metropolis. The sample size of the study was 400 respondents comprising 370 adult learners and 30 facilitators in the study area. Taro Yamane formula was adopted in determining the sample size of 370 adult learners. However, the simple random sampling technique was adopted in selecting 15 adult learners in each of the adult literacy centres in the Port Harcourt metropolis to arrive at the sample size of 370 adult learners. The 30 facilitators were taken as a census without sampling. The instrument for data collection in this study was a researcher-designed questionnaire titled Assessment of Modern Digital Learning Tools for Promoting Adult Learning in Literacy Classes Questionnaire. (AMDLTPALLCQ). The instrument was validated by three experts. A test of internal consistency using Cronbach Alpha was carried out to determine the reliability of the instrument. Reliability coefficients of 0.81, 0.86 and 0.91 were obtained for the various clusters of the instrument. The research questions were answered using mean and standard deviation. The findings of the study revealed that the use of modern digital learning tools such as Projeqts, Animato and TED Ed promoted adult learning in literacy centres in Port Harcourt metropolis. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended among others that the Rivers State Agency for Adult and Non- formal education should embark on the training of facilitators on digital literacy to enable them to access and use the modern learning digital tools such as animators, projeqts and others for enhancing learning in their classes.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


modern digital tools, literacy, adult learning, Port Harcourt

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agbor, C. A., Ashabua, D. A. & Udosen, O. (2020). Evaluation of student’s competence in the use of information communication technology in Nigeria. European Journal of Social Science 59(4) 412- 421.

Albert, D. J. (2015). Social media in music education. Journal of Music Education. 102 (2) 31- 38.

Amanda, F. (2019). Effective educational tools for modern classrooms. Available at https://www.techprevue.com/effective-educational-tools-modern-class/ (Retrieved date March 3, 2021).

Arkorful, V. (2014). The role of e-learning advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. Research gate. Net. Retrieved date: July 25, 2021.

Ashutosh, C. (2018). 11 Digital Education Tools for Teachers and Students. https://elearningindustry.com/digital-education-tools-teachers-students Retrieved date: July 31, 2021.

Baker, A. (2016). Active learning with interactive video: creating student-guided learning materials. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning. 1- 9. Jour. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/1533290x.2016. 1206776.

Daris, L. (2020). Digital learning: What to know in 2020. https://www.schoology.com/blog/digital-learning. Retrieved date: February 6, 2020.

Dokubo, C. & Wagbara, E. (2021). Evaluation of Adult Education students' competence in the Use of Social Media Platforms for Learning in Rivers State University, Port Harcourt in Readings in Contemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning, 263-274. Port Harcourt: Harley Publications Coy.

Donna, J. A. (2019). Online learning is not the big thing: It is now big thing. https://e-student.org. Retrieved date: April 4, 2020.

Edwards, L. (2021). What is Animoto and how does it work? https://www.techlearning.com. Retrieved date: June 4, 2021.

Fame, T. (2021). Tutoroom/online teaching software. Available at: https://tutorroom.net/en/home/

James, T. (2019). 10 outstanding benefits of e-learning. Available at https://e-learningindustry.com. (Retrieved date: July 20, 2020).

Mandela, N. (2021). 10 biggest disadvantages of e-learning. https://www.e-student.org. Retrieved date: July 24, 2021.

Nikki, K. (2020). Virtual learning platforms and tools for teachers and kids. Available at: www.wearteachers.com (Retrieved date: March 31, 2021).

Pandword education (2017). Benefits of digital learning over traditional education methods. http://www.pandworldeducation.com. Retrieved date: June 30, 2021.

Sammy, E. (2018). Top 10 tools for the digital classroom. https://www.elearningindustry.com. Retrieved date: June 15, 2021.

Smart, K. L. & James, J.C. (2006). Students’ perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 5 (1), 201- 219.

United National Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO 2018). What is functional literacy and why does our High-Tech Society Need it? https://www.mindfultechnics.com. Retrieved date: December 30, 2018.

Urokova, S.B. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online education. Journal of ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science 9(89) 34- 37.

Western Sydney University (2018). Building digital capability for new digital leadership, pedagogy and efficiency. http://www.jisc.ac.uk. Retrieved date: October 31, 2018.

Western Sydney University (2020). Re-thinking the importance of developing student digital capabilities in a post of Covid- 19 world. https://www.jisc.ac.uk. Retrieved date: May 13, 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v7i1.4214

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2023. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).