ACADEMICS’ PERSPECTIVES ON DISTANCE EDUCATION: EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Gökhan Demircioğlu

Abstract


This study seeks to provide an in-depth understanding of the experiences and difficulties encountered by academics during the distance education process at a provincial university in Türkiye. Designed within a qualitative research framework and grounded in interpretive phenomenology, the study investigates academics’ perceptions of distance education, the pedagogical and technological challenges they faced, their views on institutional support, and the strategies they employed to manage the process. The study group comprised 17 academics (8 male, 9 female) from eight different departments. Participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis techniques. Results showed that although many academics considered themselves technologically competent, this competence was largely limited to basic technical skills rather than the effective pedagogical integration of technology into teaching practices. Major challenges included insufficient technological infrastructure, limited student engagement, a lack of interaction due to closed cameras, and substantial constraints in delivering practice-based courses and conducting valid and reliable assessments in an online environment. While the distance education experience contributed positively to academics’ technological development, especially in terms of digital tool usage, it also diminished professional satisfaction in disciplines heavily reliant on practical applications. Academics reported developing various personal coping strategies, such as modifying course content and employing alternative digital platforms. However, institutional support mechanisms were frequently viewed as delayed, reactive, and inadequate. Overall, the study concludes that the rapid and crisis-induced shift to distance education exposed a discrepancy between technological adaptation and meaningful pedagogical transformation. The findings highlight the necessity of developing sustainable and discipline-specific institutional policies that promote hybrid learning models, enhance technological infrastructure, ensure equitable access to resources, provide ongoing pedagogical training, and introduce clear regulations regarding attendance and camera use in order to foster interaction and engagement in future distance education contexts.

Keywords


distance education, problems, experiences, academics’ views

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ağır, F. (2007). Özel okullarda ve devlet okullarında çalışan ilköğretim öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime karşı tutumlarının belirlenmesi [Determining the teachers' attitudes towards distance education in public primary school and private primary school; Unpublished master thesis]. Balıkesir University. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

Aksoğan, M., & Çalış-Duman, M. (2020). A research on academician opinions on distance education in the COVID-19 process. Naturengs, COVID-19 Special Issue, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.46572/nat.2020.10

Akyürek, M. İ. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim: Bir alan yazın taraması [Distance education: A literature review]. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-9. https://izlik.org/JA48PW62TT

Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16–25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1259642.pdf

Bakioğlu, B., & Çevik, M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri [Science Teachers' Views on Distance Education in the COVID-19 Pandemic Process]. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43502

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477

Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye'de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını [The Past, Present and Future of the Distance Education in Turkey]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124. https://izlik.org/JA34FJ39XZ

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. Retrieved from http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447

Can, E. (2020). Coronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemisi ve pedagojik yansımaları: Türkiye’de açık ve uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları [Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic and its pedagogical implications: Open and distance education practices in Turkey]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 11-53. https://izlik.org/JA32KL96LX

Cheng, A. C., & Jordan, T. (2013). Reconsidering assessment in online/hybrid courses: Knowing versus learning. Computers & Education, 68, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.022

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232577017_Qualitative_Inquiry_Research_Design_Choosing_Among_Five_Approaches

Çakın, M., & Akyavuz, E. K. (2020), Covid-19 süreci ve eğitime yansıması: öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi [The Covid-19 process and its reflection on education: An analysis on teachers’ opinions]. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 6(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.747901

Çakıroğlu Çevik, A. (2023). Görünmeyen çoğunluk “birinci nesil üniversite öğrencileri”nin Covid-19 salgın deneyimleri [Covid-19 pandemic experiences of the invisible majority “first-generation university students”]. Journal of Sociological Research, 26(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1290153

Çardak, U., & Güler, Ç. (2022). Uzaktan eğitim ve uzaktan öğretmen yetiştirme bağlamında akademisyen uygulama, görüş ve önerileri [Academicians' practices, opinions and suggestions in the context of distance education and distance teacher training]. Van YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 19 (Special issue), 323-353. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1068111

Çoban, M. (2020). Öğretim teknolojilerinde yeni yaklaşımlar [New approaches in instructional technologies]. M. A. Özerbaş (Ed.), Öğretim teknolojileri (ss. 135-178) içinde. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. http://doi.org/10.14527/9786257880909

Demircioğlu, G. (2023). Fenomenolojik araştırma deseni [Phenomenological research design]. E. Taşdemir & A. B. Dereli (eds), İletişimsel bağlamda nitel araştırma: desenler ve veri analizi (ss. 67-85). Konya: Palet Yayınları.

Fidan, M. (2020). Covid-19 belirsizliğinde eğitim: İlkokulda zorunlu uzaktan eğitime ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Education in the uncertainty of Covid-19: teachers' views on emergency remote teaching in primary school]. Usak University Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.736643

Herand, D., & Hatipoğlu, Z. A. (2014). Uzaktan eğitim ve uzaktan eğitim platformlarının karşılaştırılması [E-learning and comparison of commonly used e-learning platforms]. Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 18(1), 65-75. https://izlik.org/JA63RZ57BM

Hodges, C. B., & Fowler, D. J. (2020). The COVID-19 Crisis and faculty members in higher education: from emergency remote teaching to better teaching through reflection. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 5(1), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.32674/jimphe.v5i1.2507

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning- its challenges and future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European journal of teacher education, 43(4), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650

Köse, U., & Koç, D. (2014). Artificial intelligence applications in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(4), 359-362, https://izlik.org/JA84NW44GS

Kurnaz, E., & Serçemeli, M. (2020). Covid-19 pandemi döneminde akademisyenlerin uzaktan eğitim ve uzaktan muhasebe eğitimine yönelik bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma [A research on academicans’ perspectives on distance education and distance accounting education in the Covid-19 pandemia period]. International Journal of Social Sciences Academy, 3, 262-288. https://izlik.org/JA92AF53ZK

Landis, J, R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. PMID: 843571. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/843571/

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Meriç, S. (2022). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin pandemi dönemindeki uzaktan eğitim deneyimleri üzerine bir araştırma [A study on distance education experiences of social studies teachers during the pandemic period; Unpublished master's thesis]. Akdeniz University. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). New York: Sage. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97407-000

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Öztürk, M. (2024). Rethinking online assessment quality from pre-service teachers’ perspectives. Open Praxis, 16(4), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.689

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035719X0300300213

Pençe, O. S. (2024). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitim ve yeni eğitimsel eşitsizlikler: meta-anlatı yöntemini kullanan sistematik bir literatür derlemesi [Distance education and new educational inequalities in Türkiye: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method]. Trakya Journal of Education, 14(3), 1435-1458. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1392742

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (ss.53-80). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/2049463714541642

Şen Ö., & Kızılcalıoğlu G. (2020). COVID-19 pandemi sürecinde üniversite öğrencilerinin ve akademisyenlerin uzaktan öğretime yönelik görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determining the views of university students and academics on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic]. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 4(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.830913

Uşun, S. (2006). Uzaktan Eğitim [Distance Education]. Ankara: Nobel Publications.

Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning Journal, 21(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.761

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (12th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v11i1.6594

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2026. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).