ASSESSING CLASSROOM PRACTICES OF CHEMISTRY LECTURERS IN COLLEGES OF EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE MULTIPLE-CASE STUDY

Solomon Boachie, Francis Quansah, Emmanuel Kyame Oppong, Sam Arkoful, Rita Asano

Abstract


This study investigated how chemistry lecturers in the Colleges of Education enact a reformed Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) chemistry curriculum designed to promote inquiry-based instruction, practical laboratory work, ICT-supported pedagogy, and learner-centred approaches. Using a qualitative multiple-case study design, the study drew on structured, reliability-tested classroom observations conducted across five Colleges of Education. Cross-case thematic analysis revealed persistent reliance on lecture-based instruction, limited use of practical laboratory activities, minimal integration of ICT tools, and generally low levels of learner engagement. These patterns indicate a substantial gap between the intended learner-centred curriculum and the enacted teaching practices. Strong inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.70–0.84) strengthened confidence in the consistency of observed instructional patterns. Interpreted through the lenses of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), curriculum implementation theory, and educational change frameworks, the findings demonstrate how institutional capacity, teacher beliefs, pedagogical preparedness, and limited technological competence shape curriculum enactment. The study recommends that the government and stakeholders prioritise the equitable provision of laboratory infrastructure, teaching aids, and ICT facilities to reduce disparities in curriculum implementation across colleges. Stronger administrative monitoring mechanisms should be instituted to ensure uniform implementation of the curriculum across all colleges.

Keywords


chemistry; education; qualitative multiple-case study; fidelity of implementation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abadir, S., Batsa, E. T., Neubert, M., & Halkias, D. (2020). Leading multicultural teams in agile organisations. Social Science Research Network. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3507635

Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of computers in education, 11(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6

Adofo, S. (2017). Teachers' perceptions about inquiry in science education. Retrieved from https://erepo.uef.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/750e194c-5b81-4176-be4c-6198c386578d/content

Akuma, F. V., & Gaigher, E. (2021). A systematic review describing contextual teaching challenges associated with inquiry-based practical work in natural sciences education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 17, Issue 12. Retrieved from https://www.ejmste.com/article/a-systematic-review-describing-contextual-teaching-challenges-associated-with-inquiry-based-11352

Albaradie, R. S. (2018). Perception of students and teachers about didactic teaching: A cross-sectional study. Saudi Journal for Health Sciences, 7(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_28_18

Amadu, C. D., Fevlo, E. S., & Gato, C. C. (2023). Implementing a learner-centred curriculum in the Colleges of Education in Ghana: An assessment of chemistry lecturers’ classroom practices. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(2), 145–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i2.4665

Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/an-introduction-to-data-analysis/toc#_

Chauhan, L., Bunkar, R. C., Verma, A., & Mounika, B. (2024). Observational research: A qualitative research method. Exploring Narratives: A Guide to Qualitative Research Methods. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386506046_OBSERVATIONAL_RESEARCH_A_QUALITATIVE_RESEARCH_METHOD

Coffie, I. S. (2025). Transforming science teaching and learning in Ghana through teacher professional learning: A Change Laboratory study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Technology Sydney (Australia)). Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/189992/1/thesis.pdf

Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2019). Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation. Brill. Retrieved from https://brill.com/display/title/37514

Deng, F., Chen, W., Chai, C. S., & Qian, Y. (2011). Constructivist-oriented Data-logging Activities in Chinese Chemistry Classroom: Enhancing Students' Conceptual Understanding and Their Metacognition. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 20(2). Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Constructivist-oriented-Data-logging-Activities-in-Deng-Chen/6a0a147d86284807ad9d2aa8e497a3ee5f078bbe

Du Plessis, A. (2016). Student Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs: Learner-Centred or Teacher-Centred When Using ICT in the Science Classroom? Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.140

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://michaelfullan.ca/books/new-meaning-educational-change/

Ganajova, M., Sotakova, I., Lukac, S., Ješková, Z., Jurkova, V., & Orosova, R. (2021). Formative assessment as a tool to enhance the development of inquiry skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204

Guo, L., Jafri, M., Williams, P. J., & Wang, C. (2022). Students’ sense-making in technology- enhanced interactive environments. Educational Media International, 59(4), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2022.2153991

Gutierez, S. B. (2019). Learning from teaching: Teacher sense-making on their research and school-based professional development. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1181–1200. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342475911_Learning_from_teaching_Teacher_sense-making_on_their_research_and_school-based_professional_development

Hacıeminoğlu, E., Yıldız, N. G., & Şeker, R. (2022). Factors related to cognitive reasoning of pre- service teachers’ science process skills: Role of experiments at home on meaningful learning. Sustainability, 14(13), 7703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137703

Halkias, G., Micevski, M., Diamantopoulos, A., & Milchram, C. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of foreign-brand communication: Consumer culture, advertising imagery, and brand schema incongruity. Journal of Business Research, 80, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.018

Herga, N. R., Čagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 593-608. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a

Hofstein, A., & Hugerat, M. (2021). Teaching and learning in the school chemistry laboratory. Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839164712

Hsu, Y. S., Lai, T. L., & Hsu, W. H. (2015). A design model of distributed scaffolding for inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 241–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9421-2

Jones, T. R., & Burrell, S. (2022). Present in class yet absent in science: The individual and societal impact of inequitable science instruction and the challenge to improve science instruction. Science education, 106(5), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21728

Kennedy, K. (2020). Evaluation of a Hybrid PD on Technology-Enhanced Inquiry-Based Science Teaching (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies).

King, F. (2016). Teacher professional development to support teacher professional learning: Systemic factors from Irish case studies. Teacher development, 20(4), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1161661

Kitaw, S. L., & Cherie, D. S. (2025). Transforming Chemistry Education in Africa: A 21st Century Perspective on Opportunities and Challenges. African Journal of Chemical Education (AJCE), 15, 198. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398781420_TRANSFORMING_CHEMISTRY_EDUCATION_IN_AFRICA_A_21ST_CENTURY_PERSPECTIVE_ON_OPPORTUNITIES_AND_CHALLENGES

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786

Leijen, Ä., & Pedaste, M. (2018). Pedagogical beliefs, instructional practices, and opportunities for teachers' professional development in Estonia. In The teacher’s role in the changing globalising world (pp. 33–46). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_003

Mesci, G., Schwartz, R. S., & Pleasants, B. A. S. (2020). Enabling factors of preservice science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the nature of science and the nature of scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 29(2), 263–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00090-w

Millar, R. (2010). Practical work. Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say, 2, 108-134.

Moju, M., Taylor, L., & Iweuno, B. (2025). Tackling the challenge of chemical representations through sensemaking practices in chemistry education. Discover Education, 4(1), 352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00703-3

Neale, J. (2016). Iterative categorisation (IC): a systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction, 111(6), 1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13314

Niess, M. L., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2017). Expanding teachers’ technological pedagogical reasoning with a systems pedagogical approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3473

Ogwudile, C. L. (2025). Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model of Evaluation. Irish International Journal of Engineering and Scientific Studies, 8(5), 1–24. Retrieved from https://eprints.gouni.edu.ng/5529/1/IIJESS_2509002034%20%281%29.pdf

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Weinbaum, R. K. (2016). Mapping Miles and Huberman's Within-Case and Cross-Case Analysis Methods onto the Literature Review Process. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(1), 265–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jei.v2i1.9217

Pepin, B., Kohanová, I., & Lada, M. (2025). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Capacity for Lesson Planning with the Support of Curriculum Resources. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01685-0

Reissman, M., & Reissman, T. (2017, June). Scaffold approach to teaching experimentation. In 2017, the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28811

Rogan, J. M., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1171–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069021014 5819

Shohel, M. M. C., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Azim, F., Naomee, I., Rahman, M. S., & Siddik, M. A. B. (2022). Blended learning space for primary and secondary education: Challenges and opportunities in resource-constrained contexts. Designing effective distance and blended learning environments in K-12, 187–222. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6829-3.ch012

Solórzano, R. W. (2019). High-stakes testing and educational inequality in K-12 schools. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.938

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). Institutionalising evaluation in schools. In International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 775–805). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_45

Walker, R. (2017). Naturalistic research. Research Methods & Methodologies in Education, 78–84.

Wright, L. J., Henson, R. A., & Malkin, L. M. (2025). Actionable Assessment: Designing Meaningful Score Reports to Support Student Engagement. Educational Assessment, 30(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2025.2497773

Wu, S. H., Lai, C. L., Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). Research trends in technology-enhanced chemistry learning: A review of comparative research from 2010 to 2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(4), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09894-w

Yarber, K. (2024). Advancing Qualitative Inquiry in Agricultural Communications: An Analysis of Theories, Methodologies, and Standards for Quality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5351/

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150

Zinger, D., Sandholtz, J. H., & Ringstaff, C. (2020). Teaching science in rural elementary schools: Affordances and constraints in the age of NGSS. Rural Educator, 41(2), 14–30. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1277479.pdf

Zion, M., Schwartz, R. S., Rimerman-Shmueli, E., & Adler, I. (2020). Supporting teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and inquiry through personal experience and perception of inquiry as a dynamic process. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1281–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9732-9




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v11i1.6616

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2026. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).