GREENING ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING: PRACTICES, CHALLENGES, AND THE WAY FORWARD IN THE HIGHER INSTITUTIONS IN GWERU, ZIMBABWE

Rosemary Ngara, LillieBeth Hadebe

Abstract


The global sustainability agenda has heightened expectations for Institutions of Higher Learning (IHLs) to integrate environmentally responsible practices across teaching, learning, and assessment. While considerable attention has been paid to greening curricula and campus operations, assessment practices remain largely under explored despite their significant environmental footprint. This study examined the extent to which assessment methods were being “greened” in selected higher education institutions in Gweru, Zimbabwe, focusing on existing practices, institutional challenges, and opportunities for sustainable transformation. Guided by Sustainable Assessment Theory and Institutional Theory, the study adopted a mixed-methods approach to gather data from academic staff on assessment practices, perceptions, and institutional support structures. Findings revealed a persistent reliance on paper-based assessments, driven by technological constraints, inadequate training, policy–practice gaps, and entrenched institutional cultures, despite high awareness of sustainability goals and strong support for digital assessment methods. The study identified a critical disconnect between normative commitments to sustainability and the institutional capacity to operationalise green assessment practices. It concluded that effective greening of assessment required coordinated policy reform, targeted capacity building, and strategic investment in technological infrastructure. The study contributes empirical evidence from an urban Zimbabwean context and offers practical recommendations to align assessment practices with sustainable development goals in higher education.

Keywords


green assessment; sustainability; higher learning; sustainable assessment theory; institutional theory; digital assessment practices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(16), 1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.12.002

Al-Jadiry, B. (2020). Technological barriers to e-learning implementation in higher education: A literature review.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215915395_Teaching_for_Quality_Learning_at_University

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. Retrieved from https://dro.deakin.edu.au/articles/journal_contribution/Sustainable_assessment_rethinking_assessment_for_the_learning_society/20910652

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133

Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Open University Press. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED423743.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications. Retrieved from https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842

David, M. (2014). Doing research in education with children and young people (2nd ed.) SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Doing_Research_with_Children_and_Young_P.html?id=rOmRAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 1(1), 3-31. Retrieved from https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/3609/1/LATHE%201.%20Conditions%20Under%20Which%20Assessment%20Supports%20Students%27%20Learning%20Gibbs_Simpson.pdf

Government of Zimbabwe. (2021). National Development Strategy 1 (NDS1): 2021-2025.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. Retrieved from https://tguskey.com/wp-content/uploads/TT-02-Prof-Dev-Tchr-Change.pdf

Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., & D’hondt, D. (2015). The concept of assessment for sustainable development in higher education: a conceptual model and a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 16–29.

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Qualitative_Researching.html?id=gW5su96QHL0C&redir_esc=y

Shriberg, M. (2002). Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(02)00006-5

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/education-sustainable-development-goals-learning-objectives




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v11i1.6655

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2026. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).