THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL HEALTH SERVICES ON PRIMARY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT IN ISRAEL: HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS' PERSPECTIVES ON EFFECTIVENESS, EFFICIENCY, AND EQUITY

Gamal Nawaf

Abstract


The rapid development of digital health care services has changed the processes for the provision and management of primary health care worldwide. The use of digital communication technologies, such as telephone conversations, patient portals, web-based administration services, and telemedicine, has increased access and efficiency. Nevertheless, the potential effects of those changes on the effectiveness of the services provided, the workload of healthcare professionals, patient safety, and the equity of healthcare services remain issues to be considered. Although there is evidence of the extensive use of new technologies by healthcare providers, few studies have addressed those issues from the viewpoint of healthcare professionals. The purpose of this qualitative study is to examine the influence of digital health care services on the management of the healthcare system in Israeli primary care clinics through the three dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. In order to achieve this goal, semi-structured interviews will be held with 30 healthcare professionals who regularly use digital communication technologies in their work, including doctors and administrators.
The results demonstrate that digital health services greatly enhance the accessibility of services, administrative efficiency, and communication between patients and healthcare providers. At the same time, the participants of the research also pointed out the presence of many difficulties, such as increased burden of work, inappropriate use of communication channels for consultation purposes, diagnostic ambiguity due to the lack of physical examination and increasing disparity between people who have poor technological skills or access to technology. Participants highlighted that the successful introduction of digital healthcare requires the development of clinical guidelines, training programs and the proper balance between digital and face-to-face consultations. The study makes a valuable contribution to the literature on digital health and represents an integrated assessment of healthcare system performance on the basis of three criteria - effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. The results of the study provide valuable recommendations for those who are interested in developing safer, efficient and equitable digital healthcare systems.


Keywords


digital health; primary healthcare; virtual consultations; healthcare management; effectiveness; efficiency; equity; telemedicine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, A., Hossain, F., Bouh, M. M., & Paul, P. (2024). Technical barriers to generating a personal health record (PHR) from analog sources in low-resource settings.

Akhtar, N., Khan, N., Qayyum, S., Qureshi, M. I., & Hishan, S. S. (2022). Efficacy and pitfalls of digital technologies in healthcare services: A systematic review of two decades. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.869793

Alotaibi, N., Wilson, C. B., & Traynor, M. (2025). Enhancing digital readiness and capability in healthcare: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 500. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12663-3

Andersson, S. W., & Gonzalez, M. P. (2025). Digital health literacy—a key factor in realizing the value of digital transformation in healthcare. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1461342

Ardic, N., & Dinc, R. (2025). Emerging trends in multi modal artificial intelligence for clinical decision support: A narrative review. Health Informatics Journal, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251366141

Bao, C. C., & Bihn, D. (2021). Effectiveness of digital health services: Challenges and constraints for society. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Medical and Health Science Study, 2(1), 69–75. Retrieved from https://amrsjournals.com/index.php/jamrmhss/article/view/89

Bevilacqua, R., Strano, S., Di Rosa, M., Giammarchi, C., Cerna, K., Mueller, C., & Maranesi, E. (2021). eHealth literacy: From theory to clinical application for digital health improvement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 11800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211800

Brommeyer, M., Whittaker, M., Mackay, M., & Liang, Z. (2025). Digital competencies for health service managers and health service implications for Australia. Health Information Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583251396573

Bukowski, M., Farkas, R., Beyan, O., Moll, L., Hahn, H., Kiessling, F., & Schmitz-Rode, T. (2020). Implementation of eHealth and AI integrated diagnostics with multidisciplinary digitized data. European Radiology, 30, 5510–5524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06874-x

Carini, E., Villani, L., Pezzullo, A. M., Gentili, A., Barbara, A., Ricciardi, W., & Boccia, S. (2021). The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9). https://doi.org/10.2196/26189

Cassidy, R. (2021). Attitudes towards digital health technology: Introducing the digital health scale. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.03.21262482

Copelovitz, G. (2021). Digital health in Israel – The upsurge of big data and preemptive medicine: The role of the public sector.

Das, A., Dahi, T., Bashanka, R., Chanchaimongkon, S., & Koshechkin, K. (2025). Telemedicine and remote consultations: Expanding access to healthcare in the digital era. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR) 10(5). Retrieved from https://ijsdr.org/papers/IJSDR2505419.pdf

Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association, 260(12), 1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.260.12.1743

García-Magariño, I., Sarkar, D., & Lacuesta, R. (2019). Wearable technology and mobile applications for healthcare. Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6247094

Gjellebæk, C., Svensson, A., Bjørkquist, C., Fladeby, N., & Grundén, K. (2020). Management challenges for future digitalization of healthcare services. Futures, 124, 102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102636

Härkönen, H., Lakoma, S., Verho, A., Torkki, P., Leskelä, R., Pennanen, P., Laukka, E., & Jansson, M. (2024). Impact of digital services on healthcare and social welfare: An umbrella review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 152, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104692

Ibrahim, M. S., Yusoff, H. M., Bakar, Y. I. A., Aung, M. M. T., Abas, M. I., & Ramli, R. A. (2022). Digital health for quality healthcare: A systematic mapping of review studies. Digital Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221085810

Jeilani, A., & Hussein, A. (2025). Impact of digital health technologies adoption on healthcare workers’ performance and workload: Perspective with DOI and TOE models. BMC Health Services Research, 25(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12414-4

Kraus, S., Schiavone, F., Pluzhnikova, A., & Invernizzi, A. C. (2020). Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. Journal of Business Research, 123, 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.030

Longhini, J., Rossettini, G., & Palese, A. (2022). Digital Health Competencies among Health Care Professionals: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(8), e36414. https://doi.org/10.2196/36414

Mauro, M., Noto, G., Prenestini, A., & Sarto, F. (2024). Digital transformation in healthcare: Assessing the role of digital technologies for managerial support processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, 123781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123781

Nascimento, I. J. B. D., Abdulazeem, H. M., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Zapata, T., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2023). The global effect of digital health technologies on health workers’ competencies and health workplace: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and lexical-based and sentence-based meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(8), e534–e544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00092-4

Naamati-Schneider, L. (2023). The effect of digitalization on service orientation and service perception among Israeli healthcare professionals. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231191892

Nataliia, V., Barzylovych, A., Zabolotna, A., Boiko, M., & Rybchych, I. (2021). Healthcare facilities management in digitalization context. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 429–440.

Nojomi, M., Babaee, E., Rampisheh, Z., Roohravan Benis, M., Soheyli, M., & Rady Raz, N. (2025). AI powered clinical decision support systems in disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 39, 81. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.81

OECD. (2017). Health at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2017/11/health-at-a-glance-2017_g1g800d8.html

Okumuş, H., Ghorbani, S., & Karatepe, S. (2019). A study on relationship between financial performance and supply chain in the accepted companies in Borsa Istanbul. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 417-426. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2018.12.005

Smith, P. C., Mossialos, E., Papanicolas, I., & Leatherman, S. (2009). Performance measurement for health system improvement: Experiences, challenges and prospects. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711800

Shuja, N. (2025). Digital health tools and doctor–patient relationship. Pak Medical & Allied Journal, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.53350/Annalspakmed.1.3.1

Stoumpos, A. I., Kitsios, F., & Talias, M. A. (2023). Digital transformation in healthcare: Technology acceptance and its applications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3407. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043407

Surabhi, P. K. (2025). Digital transformation in healthcare technology: A technical perspective. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 13(30), 50–66. https://eajournals.org/ejcsit/vol13-issue30-2025/digital-transformation-in-healthcare-technology-a-technical-perspective/

Van Kessel, R., Srivastava, D., Kyriopoulos, I., Monti, G., Novillo-Ortiz, D., Milman, R., Zhang-Czabanowski, W. W., Nasi, G., Stern, A. D., Wharton, G., & Mossialos, E. (2023). Digital health reimbursement strategies of 8 European countries and Israel: Scoping review and policy mapping. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 11. https://doi.org/10.2196/49003

World Health Organization. (2000). The world health report 2000: Health systems – improving performance. WHO. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/924156198X




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejphs.v9i2.267

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Gamal Nawaf

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2019 - 2026. European Journal of Public Health Studies (ISSN 2668-1056/ISSN-L 2668-1056) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.