THE VALUE OF METAPHORS IN KEN WALIBORA’S KISWAHILI TEXT: ‘KIDAGAA KIMEMWOZEA’

Victor Ondara Ntabo

Abstract


The novelist Ken Walibora employs metaphors in his Kiswahili text Kidagaa Kimemwozea to discuss about the subject of neocolonialism in different perspectives. Due to the metaphoric language used, meaning might be elusive to the readers because metaphor is primarily a matter of thought and action which is normally situated in a specific context. This research, therefore, uses the Cognitive Linguistics framework to objectively reveal the meaning of the metaphors in the text. In the novel, the king (Mtemi Nasaha Bora) is expressed as irrational, dictatorial, oppressive and amorous. However, the protagonist (Amani) conspires with the king’s son to exploit the father’s weakness for the benefit of the common citizens. This study establishes the metaphors in the text using the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU) and then classifies them into conceptual domains using the principle of Great Chain of Being Metaphor (GCBM). The conceptual mapping which is a tenet of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory is used to evaluate the identified metaphors. This study adopts a qualitative research approach. The paper reveals that animals, plants and objects are stratified source domains richly used to depict the characters in the novel. For a better appreciation of metaphors, the research recommends that it is salient to use the cognitive linguistics approach to understand contextual language against the cultural, historical and geographical backdrop. The paper concludes that metaphors are vital tools of communication and should be explained using the cognitive linguistics approach.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


metaphor, cognitive linguistics, conceptual mapping, The Great Chain of Being metaphor, Kidagaa Kimemwozea

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baumeister, F.R., & Leary, R.M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments asa fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.

Boyle, A.W. (2006). Why do birds migrate? The role of food, habitat, predation and competition (Unpublished doctoral thesis), The University of Arizona, USA.

Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32, 77-96.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dolvenry, S. (2013). African Lion (panther Leo) Behaviour, Monitoring, and Survival in Human Dominated Landscape (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Wincousin-Madison, USA.

Evans, V. (2007). Towards a cognitive compositional semantics. In U. Magnusson, H. Kardela and A. Glaz (Eds.), Further insights in semantics and lexicography (pp. 11– 42). Poland: University Marie Curie University Press.

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive semantics: An introduction. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Gathigia, M.G. (2016). Metaphorical analysis of Murimi Wa Kahalf’s pop song: Ino Ni Momo. Proceedings of the Second International Research Conference (pp. 499-505). Chuka University, Kenya.

Geeraerts, D. (Ed). (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Gibbs, R.W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language. From metaphor to idiom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grady, J.E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In G. Steen & R. Gibbs (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics (PP 1-56). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.

Jones, A. (2006). Violence and “othering” in colonial and post-colonial Africa. Case study: Banda’s Malawi. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 18 (2), 197 -213.

Kleparski, G.A. (2008). The joys and sorrows of metaphorical consumption: Mozarellas, prostisciuttos, muttons and yum-yum girls – foodsemy with a romance accent, Zes zytynauk owe Uniwersyteturzeszowskiego, Seria Filologiczna Studiaanglicare Soviensia, 5, 45-59.

Kövecses, Z. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krickmann, A. (1998). On the relationship of the rhetorical, modal, logical and syntactic planes in Estonian proverbs. An Electronic Journal of Folklore, 8, 51-99.

Krzeszowski, T.P. (1997). Angels and devils in Hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Lee, H. J. (1999). A cognitive semantics analysis of manipulative motion verbs in Korean with reference to English (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Rice University, South Korea.

López, I. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, Lenguaje Representación/Culture, Language and Representation, 7 (7), 77-100.

Mugenda, A., & Mugenda, O. (2003). Research methods: quantitative and qualitative

approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Nyakoe, G.N., Ongarora, D.O. & Oloo, P. (2014). An analysis of the food metaphor in EkeGusii HIV and AIDS discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4 (1), 221 -228.

Onchoke, A.S. (2018). A Cognitive Linguistics study of Ekegusii onomastics: The case of the metaphor. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(2), 88-98.

Palinkas, I. (2006). The Development of the senses Argumentum. Kossuth Egyetemi Kiado, Derecen, 2, 191-197.

Reis, M.D. (2000). An evaluation of bed bug (cimex lecturius L.) host, location and aggregation behaviour (Unpublished MSC thesis), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.

Rundell, M., & Fox, G. (2007). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. London: Macmillan.

Singh, H.S. (2005). Status of the leopard panther pardus fusca in India. Cat News, 42, 15- 17.

Steen, G., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A.A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Tolle, E. (2005). A new Earth: Awakening to your life’s purpose. New York: Penguin Rondon House.

Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H. (1996). An introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.

Walibora, K. (2012). Kidagaa Kimemwozea. Nairobi: Spotlight Publishers (EA) Limited.

Weaver, A.D. (2009). Exemplication in newspaper: A content analysis and case studies (Unpublished MSC thesis), Ohio University, USA.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2602 - 0254 / ISSN-L 2602 - 0254). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.