ATTITUDE TOWARDS INTERCULTURAL LEARNING COMMUNITY: AN EXPLORATORY AND CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT FOR A STUDY ABROAD CONTEXT

Saleh Ali Nuri Abdalla

Abstract


This study uses rigorous validation procedures to validate an attitude towards the intercultural learning community (intercultural posture) scale. 180 Arabic learners at the International Islamic University of Malaysia (IIUM) were given a questionnaire with 25 items represented five sub-dimensions. Exploratory factor (EFA) and confirmatory factor (CFA) respectively applied to validate the final measurement model. SPSS and Amos were used for Data analysis. The final findings yielded only four sub-dimensions to support intercultural posture construct as a multidimensional concept represented: Attitude to Intercultural Tendency, Intercultural Friendship Orientation, Intercultural Working Group, and Intercultural Group Cohesiveness. A validated Intercultural posture of 12 measured items remained in the CFA result that confirmed the final valid instrument. The instrument scale would promote the identifications of variables in the sense of study abroad context which stimulus students’ engagement in intercultural communication in learning the English language.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


intercultural posture, intercultural learning community, EFA, CFA, WTC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdalla, S.A.N., 2016. Arabic-Speaking University Students’ Willingness to communicate in English in the Study abroad context. PhD Thesis, University Sains Malaysia.

Aliakbari, M., Kamangar, M., & Khany, R., 2016. Willingness to Communicate in English among Iranian EFL Students. English Language Teaching 9(5): 33. doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p33.

Asmalı, M., 2016. Willingness to Communicate of Foreign Language Learners in Turkish Context. Procedia - Social and Behavior 232:188-195. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.044

Bagozzi, Richard, Yi, Youjae & Phillips, Lynn, 1991. Assessing Construct Validity in Organization Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 421-458.doi: 10.2307/2393203.

Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, C., 1999. Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, PP269-292.

Chen, G.-M., Starosta, W.J., & Chen, G., 2000. The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication 3. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/com_facpubs.

Crooks, G., & Schmidt, R.W., 1991. Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language learning 41(4): 469-512.

Dornyei, Z. & Csizer, K., 2002. Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: results of a longitudinal national wide survey. Applied linguistics 23: 421-462.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research18(1): 39-50.

Gardner, R.C., 2002. Social psychological perspective on second language acquisition, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.102-169.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson. R.E, 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Yatham, R.L., 2006. Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Jang Ho Lee, 2018. The effects of short-term study abroad on L2 anxiety, international posture, and L2 willingness to communicate, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, doi: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1435666.

Jones, E. 2010. Internationalization and the student voice: Higher education perspectives. Journal of Research in International Education 3:313-315.

Joreskog, K. & Sorborn, D., 1993. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International Inc.

Ludwig-Hardman, S., 2003. Case study: Instructional design strategies that contribute to the development of online learning community. PhD thesis, University of Colorado.

MacIntyre, P.D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K.A., 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82(5): 545-562.

Matsubara, K., 2007. Classroom group dynamics and motivation in the EFL context. Paper presented at the JALT2006, Tokyo: JALT.

Natalya, L. & Purwanto, C.V., 2018. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the academic motivation scale (AMS)–Bahasa Indonesia. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia 22(1):29-42. doi: 10.7454/hubs.asia.2130118

Rios, Joseph & Wells, Craig, 2014. Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema. 26. 108-16. 10.7334/psicothema2013.260.

Takahashi, C., 2015. L2 Motivation and Young Self-Instructed Learners’ Persistence in Learning English: A Causal Analysis. SiSAL Journal 6(4):365–381.

Wilson, B. (1996). What is a constructivist learning environment? In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Yashima, T., 2002. Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language: The Japanese EFL Context. The Modern Language Journal86(1): 54-66.

Yashima, T., Lori, Z.-N., & Shimizu, 2004. The influence of attitudes and effect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. language learning 54(1):119-152.

Yashima, T., & Zenuk-Nishide, L., 2008. The impact of learning contexts on proficiency, attitudes, and L2 communication: Creating an imagined international community. system 36(4): 566-585.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Saleh Ali Nuri Abdalla

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.