DECEPTION IN FLYNN’S PSYCHOLOGICAL THRILLER GONE GIRL (2012): A PRAGMA-STYLISTIC ANALYSIS

Safaa K. Merzah, Nawal F. Abbas

Abstract


Most of readers’ comprehension of verbal deception descends from social psychology and cognitive perspectives, particularly from political, advertising and forensic discourse. One discoursal domain that has been hitherto largely neglected is literary discourse, particularly crime fiction. To date, this article is the first study that presents some of the many strategies which a psychopathic and non-psychopathic character/first-person narrator use to invite deception in readers and amongst characters from a pragma-stylistic perspective. This study focuses on the deceptive strategies exploited in Flynn’s popular American novel Gone Girl (2012) which is situated within the hybrid sub-genre of crime fiction: psychological thriller/whodunit. The study of the stylistic idiosyncrasies of the couple antagonists, Amy and Nick, is carried out by an eclectic pragmatic approach to expose their deceptive strategies for the fulfilment of their egoistic and/or selfish ends. The research undertaken will develop an eclectic conceptual framework which comprises the deceptive principle, speech act theory, (im)politeness, presupposition, certain rhetorical devices, and relevance theory, along with the stylistic effects achieved via the manipulation of such linguistic tools, to explore the two levels of discourse (viz., character-character level and narrator-reader level) proposed by Black (2006). More specifically, the present study is set for three main objectives: firstly, to explore the unreliable narrators’ deceptive strategies and compare the findings to the lower level of discourse, that is, character-character level. Secondly, to compare the deceptive strategies which occur on the pre- and during/post-dénouncement stage. Thirdly, investigate the language of gender differences. It has been evinced that Amy is a serial liar who employs a plethora of deceptive strategies whilst Nick is a deceiver who principally relies on indirect strategies. As for the deceptive strategies exploited on the two levels and stages are neither quantitively nor qualitatively mirror-symmetrical. It has also been found that the fashion via which Amy and Nick deceive exhibit linguistic gender differences—most of which challenge the observations on the language of women and men put forth by Lakoff (1973).

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


unreliable narration, psychopathy, lying, deception, pragmatics, stylistics, sociolinguistics, cognitive principle, gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Hindawi, F., & Al-Aadili, N. (2017. June, 10). The pragmatics of deception in American presidential electoral speeches. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5).

Adler, J. E. (1997, September). Lying, deceiving or falsely implicating. The Journal of philosophy, 49(9). 435-452.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Busse, B., Montoro, R., & Nørgaad, N. (2010). Key terms in stylistics. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Buller, D., & Burgoon, J. (2006). Interpersonal deception theory. In Griffin, E. A. (Ed.), A first look at communication theory (pp. 97-109). McGraw-Hill.

Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh University Press.

Bradac, J. (1983). The language of lovers, flowers and friends: Communication in social and personal relationships. Journal of language and social psychology, 2(2), 141-162.

Burke, M. (2011). Rhetoric and poetics: The classical heritage of stylistics. In Burke, M. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics. (pp. 11-30). Routledge.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bok, S. (1987). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. Vintage Books.

Booth, W. C., (1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367.

Carson, L. T. (2010). Lying and Deception: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.

Babanoglu, M. P. (2015). A corpus-based study on the use of feelings and emotions vocabulary by male and female EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(4), 203-209.

Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 87-106.

Chisholm, R. M., & Feehan, T. D. (1977). The intent to deceive. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(3), 143-159.

Dynel, M. (2015). The landscape of impoliteness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 329–353.

Dynel, M. (2018). Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Walter de Gruyter.

Demons, R. (1960). Lying to oneself. Journal of Pragmatics, 57(18), 588-595.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Publishing.

Ephratt, M. (2008, November). The functions of silence. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1909-1938.

Fallis, D. (2009). What is lying? The Journal of Philosophy 106(1), 29-56.

Flynn, G. (2012). Gone Girl. Crown Publishing Group.

Fu, G., Angela, D. A., Lingfeng, W., & Kang, L. (2008). Lying in the name of the collective good: A developmental study. Developmental science, 11(4), 495-503.

de Marlangeon, S. K, & Alba-Juez, L. (2012). A typology of verbal impoliteness behaviour for the English and Spanish cultures. Revista Española de Lingüístics Aplicada, 25, 69-92.

Galasiński, D. (2000). The language of deception: A discourse analytical study. Sage Publications, Inc.

Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work. In Interaction ritual. Essays on face-to-face behaviour (pp. 5-54). Pentheon Books.

Grice, H. P. (1991). Study in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Goldshmidt, O. T., & Weller, L. (2011, December, 22). Talking emotions: Gender differences in a variety of conversational contexts. Symbolic Interaction, 32(2), 117-134.

Granhag, P. A., & Strömawall, L. A. (Ed.). (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge University Press.

Herk, G. V. (2012). What is sociolinguistics? [iBooks version]. Wiley.

Hickey, L. (1993). Stylistics, pragmatics and pragmastylistics. Revue belge de Phlologue et d’Historie, 71(3). 573-586.

Hare, R. D., Forth, A. E., & Hart, S. D. (1989). The psychopath as prototype for pathological lying and deception. In Yuille, J. C (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 25-49). Springer Netherlands.

Hopper, R., & Bell, R. A. (1984). Broadening the deception construct. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 288-302.

Heyd, T. (2006). Understanding and handling unreliable narratives: A pragmatic model and method. Semiotica, 2006(162), 217-248.

Jerrries, L. & Mclntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics. [Google Books version]. Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, S. A. (2019, March, 25). Understanding the violent personality: antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, sociopathy explored. Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal, 7(2), 76-88.

Kuzio, A. (2018). Cross-cultural description in Polish and American English in computer-mediated communication [Google Books version]. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Leech, G. N. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Miller, G., Mongeau, P. A., & Sleight, C. (1986). Fudging with friends and lying to lovers: Deceptive communication in personal relationships. Journal of social and personal relationships, 3(4), 495-512.

Mahon, J. E., (2007). A definition of deceiving. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(2), 181-194.

Mahon, J. E. (2008). Two definitions of lying. The International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(2), 211-230.

Mecholsky, K. (2014). The psychological thriller: An overview. In Huppenstand, G. (Ed.), The American thriller (pp. 48-70). Salem Press.

Mannila, S. (2013). The unreliable narrator in Bret Easton Ellis’s American Psycho. [Master thesis, University of Tampere].

McCornack, S. A. (1992). Information Manipulation Theory. Communications Monographs, 59(1), 1-16.

Niemiec, R. M. (2014, October, 14). The strengths of the gone girl psychopath: Taking a closer look at the strengths misuse. Psychology Today.

Pertiwi, G. W., Iswalono, S., & Nurcahyo, R. (2016). Amy’s personality disorder in Flynn’s Gone Girl: A psychological approach. Sastra Inggris-Quill, 5(1), 65-73.

Picornell, I. (2013). Cues to deception in a textual narrative context: Lying in written witness statements. [Doctoral dissertation, Aston University].

Pratiwi, P. N. (2019). Personality disorder of Amy Dunne in gone girl. [Master thesis, Sanata Dharma University].

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

Weber, J. T. (2017). When deception gets personal: An exploration into personality’s link to deception. [Master thesis, University of Tennessee].

Saul, J. (2012). Lying, misleading, and the role of what is said. Oxford University Press.

Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness. An essay in genealogy. Princeton University Press.

Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse. John Benjamins.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and women’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80.

Vincent, J. M., & Castelfranchi, C. (1981). On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth. In Parret, H., Sbisà, M., & Verschueren, J. (Eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics. Proceedings of the conference on pragmatics (pp. 746-777). John Benjamins.

Wales, K. (2011). A Dictionary of stylistics. Routledge.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Safaa K. Merzah, Nawal F. Abbas

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.