AMERICAN SEXISM: A CRITICAL PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE

Wafaa Sahib Mehdi

Abstract


Sexism is an act of discrimination against women as being different in a hierarchical level of superiority. It is a product of the dominant patriarchal ideologies. Such an act may appear in behaviours or practices the best illustration of which is by means of language. Under the umbrella of critical studies, critical pragmatics can unravel aspects of language abuse rather than language use. In this approach, the pragmatic theories are put under scrutiny to lay bare the hidden relations of power, ideology or dominance. In fact, the eclecticism between pragmatics and criticality has been first suggested by Mey (2001) who emphasizes the critical potential of pragmatics in linguistic analysis to unveil the social functioning of language. This study sets for itself the task of investigating sexism as a critical phenomenon in the political domain owing to the fact that it has not received its due attention within this approach. Precisely, it concerns itself with the manifestations of the subtle aspects of sexism in the American political contexts. Thus, it aims at finding out an answer to the following question: What are the pragmatic phenomena that are highly utilized to manifest the sexist ideology in the political discourse? In association with this aim, it is hypothesized that sexism is presented by utilizing certain speech acts, impoliteness strategies and referential expressions. To achieve the aim of the study and test its hypothesis, an analytical model is developed for conducting the critical pragmatic analysis of the data. Upon the critical pragmatic and statistical analyses, it appears that sexist people utilize the above mentioned pragmatic strategies that impart their sexism against women rivals.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


American politics, critical pragmatics, linguistic studies, sexism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bahadur, N. (2017). Sexist Things President Donald Trump Has Said About Women. In Politics (June 29, 2017). Retrieved from: https://www.self.com/story/sexist-president-donald-trump-comments. Accessed at 8/8/2019

Beasley, C. (2005). Gender and Sexuality: Critical Theories, Critical Thinking. London: SAGE Publications

Bock, J.; Byrd-Craven, J. and M. Burkley (2017). “The Role of Sexism in Voting in the 2016 Presidential Election”. In: Personality and Individual Differences, 119. Pp. 189–193.

Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 5th ed. MA: Blackwell Publishing

Culpeper, J. (1996). “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness” In : Journal of Pragmatics 25. Pp. 349-367 Elsevier.

Culpeper, J. (2005). “Impoliteness and the Weakest Link”. In: Journal of Politeness Research. 1 (1). Pp. 35-72.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J., and M. Haugh. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Online Academic Edition (2016) https://www.britannica.com/ Accessed 2nd of Feb., 2019.

Graumann, C. and Wintermantel, M. (1989). “Discriminatory Speech Acts: A Functional Approach”. In Bar-Tal, D. ; Graumann. C.; Kruglanski, A. and W. Stroebe (Eds.). Stereotyping and Prejudice: Changing Conceptions. New York: Springer. Pp. 183- 207.

Guillaumin, C. (1995). Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

Koch, D. (2015). “It’s Not (Only) The Joke’s Fault: A Speech Act Approach to Offensive Humor”. In: Phil. Jahrbuch (122), Jahrgang / II . Pp. 318-338.

Korta, K. and Perry, J. (2011). Critical Pragmatics: An Inquiry into Reference and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Levinson, S. (2007). “Deixis”. In: Horn, L. and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics. MA: Blackwell Publishing. Pp. 97- 122.

Meibauer, J. (2016). “Slurring as Insulting”. In: Finkbeiner, R. ; Meibauer, J. and H. Wiese ( eds.) Pejoration. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. Pp. 145-167.

Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction, 2nd ed. MA: Blackwell Publishing

Mills, S. (2008). Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nguyen, T. (2005). Criticizing and Responding to Criticism in a Foreign Language: A Study of Vietnamese Learners of English. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. New Zealand: University of Auckland.

Reyes, A. (2011). “Racist: Metapragmatic Regimentation of Racist Discourse by Asian- American Youth”. In: Discourse and Society, 22 (4) Sage Publishing, Pp. 458- 473.

Scruton, R. (2007). Palgrave MacMillan Dictionary of Political Thought, 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts : An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1971 ). “What is a Speech Act?”. In: Searle, J. (ed.). The Philosophy of Language. London: Oxford University Press. Pp.39-54.

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Verschueren, J. (1999). “Whose Discipline? Some Critical Reflections on Linguistic Pragmatics”. In: Journal of Pragmatics, 31. Pp. 869-879.

Tukhina, Z. M. (2011). “Linguistic Pragmatic Mechanism of Humour in Political Discourse” In: Matveeva, G. G. and Irina A. Zyubina (eds.). IVth International Conference on Pragmalinguistics and Speech Practices. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Pp. 97-116.

Wales, K. (2011). A Dictionary of Stylistics, 3rd ed. London : Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Wodak, R. and Benke, G. (2007). “Gender as a Sociolinguistic Variable: New Perspectives on Variation Studies”. In: Coulmas, F. (ed.). The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online. Pp. 88- 105.

Wodak, R. (2009). “The Semiotic of Racism”. In: Renkema, J. Discourse, Of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. Pp. 311- 353.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i3.225

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Wafaa Sahib Mehdi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.