AN OVERVIEW OF LANGUAGE TESTING

Prashneel Ravisan Goundar

Abstract


Scholars have stated that it is “challenging to describe proficiency” (Goundar, 2020). One of the issues that teachers, researchers, students and language testers encounter is defining “what it actually means to be proficient in an L2”. Language proficiency “is the extent to which an individual possesses the linguistic cognition necessary to function in a given communicative situation, in a given modality such as listening, speaking, reading or writing”. It can be implied that proficiency is often discussed in the context of L2 acquisition, usually measured with test-scores. We conduct language tests in order gauge a learn proficiency. Therefore, it is crucial to first get an overview of the field of language testing. The aim of this paper is to briefly outline what has transpired in the field of language testing over the years.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


language testing, examination, CPE, TOEFL, IELTS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bialystok, E., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1985). Interlanguage is not a state of mind: An evaluation of the construct for second-language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 6(2), 101-117.

Coombe, C., Davidson, P., & O'Sullivan, B. (2012). The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 321.

Courtis, S. A. (1914). Standard tests in English. The Elementary School Teacher, 14(8), 374-392.

Deverell, G. (1989). The relationship between English proficiency and academic success at the University of the South Pacific. Directions, 11(1), 10-18.

Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The common European framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 1(4), 253-266.

Goundar, P. R. (2020). Bridging the gap for English language testing study in Fiji: proposing an evaluation of the writing proficiency level of pre-first year and post-first year undergraduate students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 351-358. URL: http://www.academypublication.com/ojs/index.php/jltr/article/view/jltr1103351358.

Higgs, T. V. (ed.). Teaching for Proficiency, the Organizing Principle. ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, Ill.: National Textbook, 1984. Canadian Modern Language Review, 42(5), pp. 1026–1027.

Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(3), 229-249.

Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A., & Hilton, H. (Eds.). (2014). Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (Vol. 78). Great Britain, UK: Multilingual matters.

O’Sullivan, B. (2012). A brief history of language testing. The Cambridge guide to second language assessment, 9-19.

Oller Jr, J. W. (1983). Issues in language testing research. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, MA 01969.

Sweet, H. (1899). 1964. The Practical Study of Languages. A Guide for Teachers and Learners. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, D. S. (1988). The meaning and use of the term ‘competence’ in linguistics and applied linguistics. Applied linguistics, 9(2), 148-168.

Thorndike, E. L. (1911). A scale for measuring the merit of English writing. Science, 33(859), 935-938.

Thorndike, E. L. (1912). The measurement of educational products. The School Review, 20(5), 289-299.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i3.230

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Prashneel Ravisan Goundar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.