GENDER ORDERING AS AN INDICATOR OF LINGUISTIC SEXISM IN STANDARD AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES

Leonidas Pappas, Ioannis D. Karras

Abstract


The examination of gender in relation to language is an interdisciplinary endeavour that has been the subject of interest of linguists, sociologists, anthropologists, communication experts, psychologists, and scholars in other disciplines, especially after the 1960s, having as its starting point the feminist movements by the end of that decade. Since then, there has been an ongoing debate on whether language endorses sexism, or sexism contributes to the formation of a language. Both discourse and language reflect social realities governed by hierarchy and dominance and consequently reproduce or perpetuate the network of dominant gender biases and stereotypes. This paper will focus on the way language functions in favour of dominant groups and on the means that it uses to convey those asymmetric social structures in terms of grammar, syntax, and semantics within the Standard Average European linguistic area. The secondary objective of the paper is to demonstrate the existence of the aforementioned elements in all of the languages in question, despite not being amongst their grouping criteria.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


linguistic sexism, gender bias, sociolinguistics, eurolinguistics, language reform

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Ramahi R, 2013. Sexist bias manifested in the language of nursery rhymes: Analysis of sexist linguistic features. European Scientific Journal 9(29): 186-201. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2013.v9n29p%25p.

Amare N, 2007. Where is she? Gender occurrences in online grammar guides. Research in the Teaching of English 42(2): 163-187.

Atkinson K, 1993. Language and gender. In Stevi, Jackson. (ed.) Women’s Studies: A Reader. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatshef.

Bloom P, Keil F, 2001. Thinking Through Language. Mind & Language 16(4): 351-367. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Braun F, Sczesny S, Stahlberg D, 2005. Cognitive Effects of Masculine Generics in German: An Overview of Empirical Findings. Communications 30(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.1.

Bahman M, Rahimi A, 2010. Gender representation in EFL materials: An analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 9: 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.149

Cameron D, 1985. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: Macmillan.

Coady A, 2018. The origin of sexism in language. Gender and Language 12(3): 271-293. http://doi.org/10.1558/genl.31445

Coulmas F, 2005. Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal D, 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Dahl Ö, 1990. Standard Average European as an exotic language. In Bechert J, Bernini G, Buridant C (eds), Toward a typology of European languages. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

Davies A, 1999. An Introduction to applied linguistics: from practice to theory. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Dubois B L, Crouch I, 1987. Linguistic Disruption: He/she, S/he, He or She, He-She. In Penfield J (ed.), Women and Language in Transition. New York, State University of New York.

Eckert P, McConnell-Ginet S, 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Edwards J, 1979. Judgements and confidence reactions to disadvantaged speech. In Giles H, St.Clair R N, Language and Social Psychology. Oxford, Blackwell.

Ehrlich S, King R, 1992. Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse & Society 3(2): 151-166.

Fairclough N, 1989. Language and power. London, Longman.

Fasold R W, 1987. Language policy and change: sexist language in the periodical news media. In Lowenberg P, Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Georgetown, Georgetown University Press.

Fishman J A, 1965. Who speaks what language to whom and when?. La Linguistique 2: 7-88.

Foucault M, 1966. Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris, Gallimard.

Gal S, 1991. Between Speech and Silence: The problematics of Research on Language and Gender. In diLeonardo M (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Gastil J, 1990. Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles 23(11): 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289252.

Gumperz J, Cook-Gumperz J, 2008. Studying language, culture, and society: Sociolinguistics or linguistic anthropology?. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00378.x..

Hamilton M C, 1991. Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in the user's imagery?. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 19(11-12): 785-799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00415.x.

Haspelmath M, 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath M (ed.), Language typology and language universals. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft). Berlin, de Gruyter.

He A, Zhang Yang, 2018. Sexism in English .proverbs and idioms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 9(2): 424-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.27.

Hudson R A, 1996. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Hung S, 2007. Language-Based Discrimination: Blatant and Subtle Forms. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(2): 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07300074.

Ivy D K, Backlund P, 1994. Exploring Gender Speak : personal effectiveness in gender communication. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Jayawardena S, 2015. Women in Proverbs: A Comparative Study in French and Sinhala, International Journal of Language and Literature 3(2):107-116. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v3n2a11.

Jule A, 2008. A beginner's guide to language and gender. Gender and Education 21(3): 343-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250902863512.

Kendall S, Tannen D, 2001. Discourse and Gender. In Tannen D, Hamilton H E, Schiffrin D, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford, Blackwell.

Key M R, 1975. Male/Female Language: With a Comprehensive Bibliography. Metuchen, Scarecrow Press.

Kondyli M, Archakis A, 2004. Introduction to sociolinguistics (Εισαγωγή σε ζητήματα γλωσσολογίας). Athens, Nisos.

Kovecses Z, 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture: A practical Introduction. New York, Oxford University Press.

Lakoff G, 1987. A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Philosophical Review 96 (4): 589-594.

Graddol D, Swann J, 1989. Gender Voices. Oxford, Blackwell.

Lopez-Maestre M D, 2015. 'Man the hunter': A critical reading of hunt-based conceptual metaphors of love and sexual desire. Journal of Literary Semantics 44(2): 89-113.

Marcato G, Thüne E M, 2002. Gender and female visibility in Italian. Gender across Languages (2): 187-217. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.10.14mar.

Mauss M, 1923. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques. Paris, PUF

Menegatti M, Crocetti E, Rubini M, 2017. Do Gender and Ethnicity Make the Difference? Linguistic Evaluation Bias in Primary School. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(4): 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17694980.

Mieder W, Dundes A, 1994. The Wisdom of Many: Essays on the proverb. Madison, The University of Wisconsin Press.

Milroy L, 1987. Language and social networks. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

Motschenbacher H, Stegu M, 2013. Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society 24(5): 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069.

Nakhavaly F, Sharifi S, 2013. On sex discrimination in Persian proverbs. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(1): 195-200. https://doi.org/10.4304/TPLS.3.1.195-200.

Oluga S O, Seng T C, Rajoo G S R, 2016. Replication, evocation, and revocation of linguistic sexism in translated national anthems. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature 22(2): 209. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2202-15.

Parks J B, Roberton M A, 2004. Attitudes Toward Women Mediate the Gender Effect on Attitudes Toward Sexist Language. Psychology of Women Quarterly 28: 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00140.x.

Pavlidou T, 2006. Gender and interaction. In Wodak, Ruth. Johnstone, Barbara. and Kerswill, Paul. The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics. London, SAGE Publications Ltd.

Pillay P, Maistry S, 2017. The ‘firstness’ of male as automatic ordering: Gendered discourse in Southern African Business Studies school textbooks. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 14(2): 484. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i2.484.

Pinker S, 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window Into Human Nature. New York, Viking.

Porreca K L, 1984. Sexism in Current ESL Textbooks. TESOL Quarterly 18: 705-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584.

Pullum G K, 1991. The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax and Other Irreverent Essays on the Study of Language. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Riemer N (ed.), 2016. The Routledge Handbook of Semantics. London, Routledge.

Romaine S, 1994. Language in Society. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Shi W, Zhang H, 2017. A Sociolinguistic Study of Linguistic Sexism in English Proverbs. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2(6): 459-461. https://doi.org/10.21276/sjhss.

Silveira J, 1980. Generic Masculine Words and Thinking. Women's Studies International Quarterly (3) :165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92113-2.

Slobin D I, 1987. Thinking for Speaking. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1826.

Spender D, 1980. Man Made Language. London, Routledge.

Tagliamonte S A, 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624.013.

Thomason S G, 2001. Language contact. An introduction. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Tipler C N, Ruscher, J B, 2019. Dehumanizing representations of women: the shaping of hostile sexist attitudes through animalistic metaphors. Journal of Gender Studies (28)1: 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1411790.

Traugott E, 1975. William Labov, Sociolinguistic patterns: Conduct and Communication. Language in Society 4(1): 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004528.

Trudgill P, 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.

Vainapel S, Shamir O Y, Tenenbaum Y, Gilam G, 2015. The dark side of gendered language: The masculine-generic form as a cause for self-report bias. Psychological Assessment 27(4): 1513-1519. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000156.

Vetterling-Braggin M (ed.), 1981. Sexist Language: A Modern Philosophical Analysis. Littlefield, Adams.

Wayne L D, 2007. Neutral Pronouns: A Modest Proposal Whose Time Has Come. Resources for Feminist Research 32(3-4): 85-91.

Whaley R C, Antonelli G, 1983. The birds and the beasts: Woman as animal. Maledicta: The International Journal of Verbal Aggression (7): 219-29.

Whorf B L, 1956. Language, thought, and reality. Massachusetts, Technology Press of MIT.

Wilchins R, 2004. Queer Theory, Gender Theory: An Instant Primer. Los Angeles, Alyson Publications.

Willis M, Jozkowski K N, 2018. Ladies First? Not So Fast: Linguistic Sexism in Peer-Reviewed Research. The Journal of Sex Research 55 (2): 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1346058.

Wolff P, Holmes K J, 2011. Linguistic relativity. WIREs Cogn Sci (2): 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.104.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i4.233

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Leonidas Pappas, Ioannis D. Karras

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015-2018. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.