DIGITALIZED BRIEFS: REFRAMING THE INFLUENCE OF THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT ON READERS' ENGAGEMENT WITH FLASH FICTION

Hassan Rahmeh

Abstract


The proliferation of digital platforms has redefined readers' engagement patterns, especially with concise narratives like flash fiction This research delves into a thorough analysis of the distinctive characteristics of flash fiction, a form that is currently gaining popularity and widespread acceptance due to the enjoyment it gets from the digital environment. Embracing the essence of brevity, flash fiction thrives on conciseness and magnetizes its audience within a limited word count. With the advent of digital platforms and technological advancement, the boundaries of traditional storytelling have expanded, providing a fertile and dynamic environment for the growth of flash fiction. The research employs an interdisciplinary approach, interweaving threads from psychology, media analysis, and literary criticism to investigate the specific aspects of the digital milieu that are crucial to the heightened engagement and enjoyment felt by flash fiction enthusiasts. This study seeks to shed light on the fundamental mechanisms that contribute to the magnetic pull of flash fiction in the digital domain by analyzing a variety of dimensions, including interaction, accessibility, social connection, and creativity. A fundamental component of this exploration is to unravel the core processes that elevate the appeal of flash fiction in the digital world. By dissecting these aspects, the research illuminates how the combination of these factors works in unison to enhance the charm of flash fiction in the digital age.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


flash fiction, interactivity, accessibility, social connectivity, creativity, multimedia, digital fiction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Sharqi, L., & Abbasi, I. S. (2015). Flash Fiction: A Unique Writer-Reader Partnership. Studies in Literature and Language, 11(1), 52-56.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bao-yu, N. (2015). Exploring image culture through narrative: A study on Jennifer Egan's Twitter fiction Black Box. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 5(10), 820-829.

Bell, A. (2010). The Possible Worlds of Hypertext Fiction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Bell, A. (2014). Media-Specific Metalepsis. In A. Bell, A. Ensslin, & H. K. Rustad (Eds.), Analyzing Digital Fiction (pp. 21-38). Routledge.

Botha, M. (2016). Microfiction. In A. -M. Einhaus (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the English Short Story (pp. 201-217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boxall, P. (2013). Twenty-First-Century Fiction. Cambridge University Press.

Ciccoricco, D. (2012). Focalization and Digital Fiction. Narrative, 20(3), 255-276. Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance. SAGE.

Dufresne, J. (2018). FLASH! The Art of Writing the Vet)) Short Story. WW Norton.

Drąg, W. (2018). Cutting to the Chase: Microfictions, Empathy, and the New Sincerity. Brno Studies in English, 44(1), 103-117.

Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J Abnorm Psychol. 58(2): 203-10.

Hayles, K. (2007). Electronic Literature: What is it? The Electronic Literature Organization. Retrieved from https://eliterature.org/pad/elp.html#sec3

Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.

Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (2003). The them)) & practice of learning. Kogan Page.

Joosten, T. (2012). Social Media for Educators. San Francisco, CA: Wiley/Jossey-Bass. Kiosses, S. (2021). Towards A Poetics of Narrative Brevity: Short Story, Microfiction, Flash Fiction. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 9(1), 9-18.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Buckingham, GBR: Open University Press.

Lucht, B. (2014). Flash Fiction: Literary fast food or a metamodern (sub)genre with potential?

Human And Social Sciences at the Common Conference, November 17, 222-225.

Micunovic, M., Mare'etie, H., & Krtalie, M. (2016). Literature and Writers in the Digital Age: A Small Scale Survey of Contemporary Croatian Writers' Organization and Preservation Practices. Journal of Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 45(1), 2-16.

Mills, J., & Hannon-Jones, E. (1999). Cognitive dissonance. American Psychological Association.

Murray, P. R., & Squires, C. (2013). The Digital Publishing Communications Circuit. Book 2. 0, 3(1), 3-23.

Naji, J. (2021). Mobile Electronic Literature. In J. O'Sullivan (Ed.), Electronic Literature as Digital Humanities: Contexts, Forms, & Practices (pp. 210-216). Bloomsbury Academic.

Nelles, W. (2012). Microfiction: What makes a very short story very short? Narrative, 20(1), 87-104.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255.

Punday, D. (2014). Digital Fiction and Worlds of Perspective. In A. Bell, A. Ensslin, & H. K. Rustad (Eds.), Seeing into the Worlds of Digital Fiction (pp. 57-74). Routledge.

Rettberg, S. (2009). Communitizing Electronic Literature. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 3(2). Retrieved from http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/2/000046/000046.html

Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.

Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2012). Cognitive Psychology. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

Sunstein, C. R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175-195.

Walsh, T. (2006). A right to inclusion? Homelessness, human rights, and social exclusion. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 12(1), 185-204.

Williams, T. (2014). Flash fiction. In E. Earnshaw (Ed.), The Handbook of Creative Writing (pp. 315-323). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Yadav, S. (2019). Twitter fiction: An expression of experimental postmodern e-literature. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 7(2), 128-135. 323.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v7i2.462

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Hassan Rahmeh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.