TRANSGRESSIVE FORMS IN GAINESIAN FICTION

Daniel Tia

Abstract


Anchored in black slavery, Gaines’s novel has a historical and inventive feature. On the one hand, it is characterized by its rejection of the European artistic tradition and on the other hand, by its choice for deconstructive aesthetics. On the generic level, its narrative weave suffers from a normative crisis; the norms of autobiography undergo a functional and substantial alteration, giving way to ethno-biography. Thus, the black community’s painful history is revitalized by a female voice. That narrative authority takes a step forward by making the impossible possible, reconstructing the African descents’ past, and challenging the Whites’ misrepresentation of Blacks. Symbolically, the prejudices previously held against black women are destabilized in favor of a panegyric picture, which epitomizes the latter’s determination and audacity. Female characters are illustrated as an acting force opposed to colonial ethics, questioning the colonial authority not to replace it, but to undermine it with a view to establishing a new, flexible order, which offers them a reliable way out. Through that paradigmatic renewal, black females are depicted as vital interlocutors from whom the experience of altruism, freedom, and equality takes root and helps to construct justice in American society. In the novel under consideration, the use of transgressive values exemplifies the loss of the absolutist bearings of modernism to the detriment of plurality, difference, and coexistence. A further study of the features and ideological scope of that postcolonial era characterized by the subversion of tradition seems to be advantageous. Thus, the use of deconstructive criticism as a methodological tool will contribute to digging into two points, namely subverting the naming process and challenging the colonial authority.

Keywords


rupture; innovation; normative crisis; colonial ethics; transgressive values

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beugré, N. S. (2022). L’Éthique de impossible : une étude de la justice de Derrida et Levinas. Paris, L’Harmattan.

Dumas, F. (2021). “Textbook and fairy tale: the pitfalls of didacticism in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman by Ernest J. Gaines,” Philologia. Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 135–144. Retrieved from https://philologia.org.rs/index.php/ph/article/view/232

Fang X. (2017). “A Review on Deconstruction and Criticism,” Comparative Literature: East & West. Vol. 1, No. 1, 134-139. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/257236 18.2017.1339515

Gaines, E. J. (1971). The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman. New York, Dial Press.

Gaudet, M. (1992). “Miss Jane and Personal Experience Narrative: Ernest Gaines’ The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman,” Western Folklore. Vol. 51, No. 1, 1992, 23-32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1499642

Grenouilleau, O. (2014). Qu’est-ce que l’esclavage ? Une histoire globale. Paris, Gallimard.

Raynaud, C. (2005). “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman: Generic Twists and Trappings,” Études Anglaises. Tome 58, 440-455. DOI: 10.3917/etan.584.0440

Jouve, V. (1998). L’Effet-personnage dans le roman. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

____. (2001). Poétique des valeurs. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.

Marshall, P. (1983). Praisesong for the Widow. London, Virago Press.

Meité, M. (2009). “L’Autorité discursive de Jacques Vingtras dans Le Bachelier,” Vallès et l’autorité (157-172). Saint-Étienne, Édition Saint-Étienne. [Georges Mathieu]

Mulvey, C. (2006). “The History of Miss Jane Pittman,” Transatlantica. https://doi.org/10.4000/transatlantica.951

Salius, E. M. (2018). “A Sacred Communion: The Catholic Side of Possession in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman and Two Wings to Veil My Face,” Sacraments of Memory: Catholicism and Slavery in Contemporary African American Literature. South Florida, University Press of Florida, 67-108.

Sikirivwa, M. K. (2020). “Deconstruction Theory and its Background,” American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research. Vol. 4, Iss. 4, 44-72. www.ajhssr.com

Tia, D. (2021). “Discursive Heterogeneity in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman by Ernest J. Gaines,” International Journal of Culture and History. Vol. 8, No. 1, 92-106. Retrieved 22/06/2023 from http://ijch.macrothink.org

Ward, R. (2011). “Tracing African-American history” The Dispatch. July 9. Retrieved 27/07/23 from https://cdispatch.com/lifestyles/2011-07-09/ask-rufus-tracing-african-american-history/

Whitehead, C. (2016). The Underground Railroad. New York, Doubleday.

Zima, P. V. (2002). Deconstruction and Critical Theory. London & New York, Continuum.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v7i3.471

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Tia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.