MAKING COMPLAINTS IN GHANAIAN ENGLISH: AN ANALYSIS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Charlotte Fofo Lomotey, Barbara Bosomtwe Sam

Abstract


Complaints are bound to occur in our daily interactions while seeking a remedy to that which has directly or indirectly affected someone unfavourably, thus, threatening the face of the addressee and may eventually engender social relationship breakdown if not done appropriately. This study examined complaints by speakers of Ghanaian English in three public second cycle schools in Ghana to ascertain the politeness strategies invested in expressing their dissatisfaction with an unacceptable act in Ghanaian English. The Brown and Levinson (1987) politeness theory served as the theoretical framework for the study. A case study design was adopted with data elicited from ninety-four (94) participants role-playing four complaint-provoking situations and analysed thematically. The findings revealed that eleven strategies are used in producing different complaints in Ghanaian English. The findings further indicated that Ghanaians are indirect and tend to have a high inclination toward positive politeness strategies as they try to reduce the effect of the face-threatening act of complaining on the addressee’s positive face. It was also found that this complaint behaviour is influenced by the cultural norms of politeness in Ghanaian languages.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


complaints; Ghanaian English; politeness; pragmatic transfer

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Journal articles

Agyekum K, 2004. The socio-cultural concept of face in Akan communication. Pragmatics & Cognition 12(1): 71-92.

Allami H, 2006. A sociopragmatic analysis of griping: The case of Iranian students. The Linguistics Journal 1(1): 59-76.

Anderson J A, 2009. Polite requests in non-native varieties of English: The case of Ghanaian English. Linguistic Atlantica (Journal of the Atlantics Provinces Linguistic Association) 30: 59-86.

Boxer D, 1993. Social distance and speech behaviour: The case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics 19(2): 103-125.

Borti A, 2015. Challenges in African classrooms: A case study of the Ghanaian context. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 5(4): 28-36.

De Leon K D, Parina J C M, 2016. A study of Filipino complaints in English and Tagalog. The South¬east Asian Journal of English Language Studies 22(1): 191-206.

Demeter G, 2007. Role-plays as a data collection method for research on apology speech acts. Simulation and Gaming 38(1): 83-90.

Drew P, 1998. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3): 295-325.

Jefferson G, 1988. On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35(4): 418-441.

Kasper G, 1992. Pragmatic transfer. Interlanguage studies bulletin 8(3): 203-231.

Kasper G, Dahl M, 1991. Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(2): 215-247.

Laforest M, 2002. Scenes of family life: Complaining in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10): 1595-1620.

Milleret, M. 2007. Teaching speech acts. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages 4: 29-52.

Monzoni C M, 2008. Introducing Direct Complaints through Questions: The interactional achievement of ‘pre-sequences’? Discourse Studies 10(1): 73-87.

Prykarpatska I, 2008. Why are you late? Cross-cultural pragmatic study of complaints in American English and Ukrainian. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21(21): 87-102.

Tanck S, 2002. Speech Act Sets of Refusal and Complaint: A comparison of Native and Non-Native English Speak¬ers’ Production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2(4): 1-22

Tatsuki D H, 2000. If my complaints could passions move: An interlanguage study of aggression. Journal of Pragmatics 32(7): 1003-1017.

Tompkins P K, 1998. Role-playing/simulation. The Internet TESL Journal 4(8).

Totimeh E, Bosiwah L, 2015. Polite request among the Akyem speech community in Ghana. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 3(2): 76-89.

Traverso V, 2008. The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12): 2385-2399.

Trenchs Parera M, 1994. Complaining in Catalan, complaining in English: A comparative study of native and EFL speakers. Revista española de Lingüística Aplicada (RESLA) 10: 271-288.

B. Theses

D’amico-Reisner L, 1985. An ethnolinguistic study of disapproval exchanges (sociolinguistics, rules of speaking, ESL, spontaneous speech, discourse analysis). PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Shaeffer A C, 2018. Complaints in L2 French: Perception and production across social contexts. PhD Thesis, University of Iowa.

C. Books

Blum-Kulka S, 1991. Interlanguage pragmatics: The case of requests, New York: Oxford University Press.

Brown P, Levinson S C, 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell J W, 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Garcia C, 1996. Teaching speech act performance: Declining an invitation. Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Gass S, Neu J, (eds.). 1995. Speech acts across cultures. Berlin: Mouton.

Holmes J, 1995. Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman.

Goffman E, 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behaviour. New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Ghaznavi M A, 2017. The speech act of complaining: Definition and characterization. Ms.

Kasper G, Blum-Kulka S, 1993. Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford, UK.

Saville-Troike M, 2003. The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Oxford, UK.

Spencer-Oatey H, 2004. Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London, UK.

D. Book chapters

Brown P, Levinson S, 1978 Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, pp 56-310.

Kasper G, 2008. Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory, London, UK, pp 279-303.

Murphy B, Neu J, 1996. Speech acts across Cultures, Berlin, Germany, pp 191-216.

Olstain E, Weinbach L, 1987. The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 195- 197.

Olshtain E, Weinbach L, 1993. Interlanguage Pragmatics, Oxford, UK, pp 108-122.

Place U T, 1981. Psychological aspects of language. The West Virginia Lectures.

Sauer M, 2000. Complaints: A cross-cultural study of pragmatic strategies and linguistic forms. Paper presented at AAAL Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

Trosborg A, 1994. Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin, Germany.

Trosborg A, 1995. Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin, Germany.

Watts R, 2003. Politeness. Cambridge, UK.

Wolfram W, Schilling-Estes N, 2006. American English. Oxford, UK.

Yule G, 1996. The study of language. Cambridge, UK.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v7i3.489

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Charlotte Fofo Lomotey, Barbara Bosomtwe Sam

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.