CONCEPTUAL ART AND THE ROLE OF CERAMIC MATERIALS IN CREATING MEANING

Yusuf Can Kulak

Abstract


The process of artistic transformation, which began with avant-garde art's attempt to break established rules, reached its peak by focusing on the ideas and concepts put forward by Conceptual Art rather than the physical existence of the work. Today, this phase, which has evolved into the post-conceptual process, questions the concept itself while shifting artistic production into a panoramic framework through tools such as irony, aesthetic transformation, and new media. The Conceptual Art movement, which developed particularly after 1960, questioned the evaluation of art based on formal values and brought its intellectual aspects to the forefront. In this context, ceramic material has evolved beyond being merely decorative or functional, transforming into a form of expression capable of conveying conceptual content. In line with this historical and conceptual perspective, a collection of artists representing the contemporary panorama has been created based on the phenomenological approach of the research. This collection includes artists such as John Baldessari, Lawrence Weiner, Joseph Kosuth, Sol LeWitt, and Marcel Duchamp, pioneers of Conceptual Art, as well as artists who contributed to the development of Conceptual Ceramic Art, including Bernard Leach, Lucie Rie, Sam Bakewell, Tim Kowalczyk, AES+F, Karin Lehmann, and Ai Weiwei. Additionally, figures from different disciplines, such as Sarkis Zabunyan, Dan Flavin, and Jannis Kounellis, who demonstrate the role of ceramic material in conceptual production, have also been included in the study. This research article aims to examine the interaction between Conceptual Art and Ceramic Art, revealing how ceramics have transformed into a conceptual material throughout history. In addition to the aim of the article, which is to examine and highlight the position, development, and current performance of Conceptual Ceramic Art within Conceptual Art using a phenomenological approach. The main problem of the article is to analyze how approaches that go beyond conventional understandings of art and evaluate ceramics as a tool for ideas and conceptual thinking have developed, and how they are interpreted in contemporary art practices. The study's methodology was conducted using analytical and descriptive approaches based on a literature review. The study was conducted using analytical and descriptive approaches based on a literature review. Data were collected through library research, databases, and detailed examinations conducted in virtual/physical exhibition environments. Within this scope, the effects of Conceptual Art on ceramics, the conceptualization process of ceramics, and the intellectual productions of artists have been analyzed. The findings reveal that Conceptual Art pushes both the formal and content-related boundaries of ceramic production, demonstrating that ceramics are not merely visual/functional objects but have also become powerful tools that convey ideas, criticism, or discourse. Consequently, this study emphasizes the new meanings and expressive possibilities that ceramics have gained in the context of Conceptual Art, offering a critical perspective on the artistic value of the material.

Keywords


conceptual art, ceramic art, Ai Weiwei, Joseph Kosuth, post-1960 art

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antmen, A. (2009). 20. Yüzyıl Batı Sanatında Akımlar, Sel Yayıncılık, 2. Baskı, İstanbul

Arcasoy, A. (1983). Seramik Teknolojisi, Marmara Üniversitesi Yayın No:457, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Seramik Anasanat Dalı Yayınları, Yayın No:2, İstanbul

Artfulliving. (2017, August 21). Çiçekli güvenlik kameraları İstanbul sokaklarında. Artfulliving. https://www.artfulliving.com.tr/gundem/cicekli-guvenlik-kameralari-istanbul-sokaklarinda-i-12988 (Access:18 April 2025).

Arts Council England (2015). Sam Bakewell, Imagination Dead Imagine, A-n.co.uk. https://www.a-n.co.uk/media/52430090/ (Access:12 December 2025).

Artnet. (2024). Lucie Rie, Squeezed Bowl,1958. http://www.artnet.com/artists/lucie-rie/squeezed-bowl-TTG_MpkvvLx0LpdYNTzbfw2 (Access:31 March 2025).

Bolt, B. (2015). Yeni bir bakışla, Heidegger. Kolektif Kitap. (2. Baskı). İstanbul.

Booth, S. (2010). Marl Hole -A-N The Artists Information Company, A-n.co.uk. https://www.a-n.co.uk/reviews/marl-hole-1/ (Access: 19 March 2025).

Ceramics Now. (2023, 31 Ekim). Diana Butucariu: Raw Clay, 2022. https://www.ceramicsnow.org/artworks/diana-butucariu-raw-clay-2022/ (Access:9 December 2025).

Cohen, A. (Jan 6, 2019), 13 Artists Who Highlight the Power of Words, Artsy. https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-13-artists-highlight-power (Access:13 Jan. 2025).

Cooper, E. (1978). Seramik ve çömlekçilik. Remzi Kitabevi Yayınları. (1. Baskı). İstanbul. Etimolji Türkçe. (2025). Sermik. Etimolojiturkce. https://www.etimolojiturkce.com/kelime/seramik#google_vignette (Access:10 June 2025).

Farago, F. (2017). Sanat. Doğu Batı Yayınları. (3. Baskı). Ankara.

Fineberg, J. (2014). 1940’tan günümüze sanat: Varlık stratejileri. Karakalem Kitabevi Yayınları. (3. Baskı). İzmir.

Farbstein, R., & Davies, W. (2017). Palaeolithic ceramic technology: The artistic origins and impacts of a technological innovation. Quaternary International, 441, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.09.006 (Access: 28 March 2025).

Godfrey, T. (1998). Conceptual art. Art & ideas series plan, Phaidon. London. Guggenheim Bilbao. (2025). Ai Weiwei, Dropping a Han Dynasty Urn, 1995. https://www.guggenheim-bilbao.eus/en/learn/schools/teachers-guides/ai-weiwei-dropping-han-dynasty-urn-1995 b (Access: 4 March 2025).

Harrison, C., & Wood, P. (2016). Sanat ve kuram, 1900-2000: Değişen fikirler ontolojisi. Küre Yayınları. (2. Baskı). İstanbul.

Hudson, M. (2017). Bernard Leach, Spherical vase, 1927, England. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/what-to-see/tate-st-ives-studio-sea-psychedelic-smash-ups-andaccidental/ (Access: 4 May 2025).

İz, K. (2012). Çağdaş Estetik, Estetik Ve Çağdaş Sanat. Skop. http://www.e-skop.com/skopbulten/cagdas-estetik-estetik-ve-cagdas-sanat/852 (Access:21 T July 2025)

Jankauskas, J. (2018). Conceptual Art. St. Encyclopedia. https://www.encyclopedia.com/literature-and-arts/art-and-architecture/art-general/conceptual-art (Access:14 Şubat 2025).

Jones, W. (05.08.2019). Feature | AES + F’s ‘Mare Mediterraneum’ at Galeria SENDA. Cfileonline https://cfileonline.org/feature-aes-fs-mare-mediterraneum-at-galeria-senda (Access:14 Aralık 2025).

Kozak. S. (2025). Posthumanist Design And Feminst Discourse. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies – Volume 9 Issue 1 2025. https://oapub.org/lit/index.php/EJLLL/article/view/614/642 (Access: 25 September 2025).

Kulak, C. Y. (2020). Seramiğin Kavramsal Sanatta Kullanımı Ve Bir Uygulama Projesi, (Unpublished Master's

Thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Fine Arts, Department of Ceramic and Glass. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=YQSXCeK0UbvrgIk7gUQCmw&no=JbcymHVbb9v2xED2GX0RYw (Access: 25 Mart 2025).

Kuspit, D. (2010). Sanatın sonu. Metis yayınları. (3. Baskı). İstanbul.

Peterson, B. (2019). What is plasticity in clay? https://www.thesprucecrafts.com/plasticity-2746072 (Access:29 December 2024).

Platon. (2016). Devlet. (Trans.:S. Eyüboğlu and M. A. Cimcoz), İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.

Rodgers, B. (2014). Karin Lehmann, Sediment Sampling, 2014. https://cfileonline.org/exhibition-karin-lehmann-sediment-sampling/ (Access:14 January 2025).

Özayten, N. (1997). Kavramsal sanat. A. Gevgilili., D. Hasol., ve B. Özer., (Ed.). Eczacıbaşı sanat ansiklopedisi. (2. Cilt s. 971). içinde. Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları

Saltonline. (1986). Cengiz Çekil, Düzenleme no:2, Türk-Amerikan derneği sanat galerisi, İzmir, 1986. https://archives.saltresearch.org/handle/123456789/49740 (Access: 25 December 2024).

Saltonline. (2013). Sarkis and when attitudes become form, Tutumlar biçime dönüşünce. https://saltonline.org/media/files/sarkis_ve_when_attitudes_become_form_tutumlar_bicime_donusunce_scrd-1.pdf (Access: 9 January 2025).

Scola, A. (August 2019). AES+F: Social Psychoanalysis. Whitehotmagazine. https://whitehotmagazine.com/articles/aes-f-social-psychoanalysis/4360 (Access: 19 December 2025).

Sönmez, N. (2008). Cengiz Çekil, Bir Tanık, A Witness, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Türkiye’de Güncel Sanat – 07, 1. Baskı, İstanbul

Terwiel, D. C. (2010). Okul Öncesi Sanat Eğitiminde Bir Malzeme Olarak Kilin Yeri, Ankara Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü:258, Ankara

Tuxill, W. P. (2010). A Re-Conceptualisation of Contemporary Sculptural Ceramics Practice From A Post-Minimalist Perspective [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Hertfordshire, ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265669983_A_Re Conceptualisation_of_Contemporary_Sculptural_Ceramics_Practice_From_A_Post-Minimalist_Perspective (Access: 9 January 2025).

Ward, O. (2019). Art & Language, Lissongallery. https://www.lissongallery.com/artists/art-language (Access: 21 June 2025)

Wainwright, S. L. (2018). Art as idea, Post object art, Conceptual art. https://www.britannica.com/art/conceptual-art (Access: 7 October 2024).

Walsh, D. (2017). Jannis Kounellis, Fishbowl, 1958. https://mona.net.au/blog/2017/03/hooks (Access: 25 December 2024).

Wood, P. (2002). Conceptual art. Tate publishing Series: Movements in art. London. https://books.google.md/books?id=33MwAQAAIAAJ&hl=ro&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Wolfe, S. (2019). Art movement: Conceptual arts. https://magazine.artland.com/conceptual-art/ (Access: 26 December 2024).

Image References

AES+F. (2015-2018). Mare Mediterraneum Series. [Sculpture]. Cfileonline. https://cfileonline.org/feature-aes-fs-mare-mediterraneum-at-galeria-senda (Access: 14 December 2025).

-8. Bakewell, S. (2015). Imagination Dead Imagine, [Installation] Arts Council England. https://www.a-n.co.uk/media/52430092/ (Access: 12 November 2025).

-5. Brownsword, N. (2009). The Marl Hole Project, [Land Art], Tuxill. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Neil-Brownsword-The-Marl-Hole-Project-2009_fig1_265669983 (Access: 11 August 2025).

Butucariu, D. (2022). Raw Clay, [Land Art]. Ceramicnow. https://www.ceramicsnow.org/artworks/diana-butucariu-raw-clay-2022/ (Access: 9 June 2025).

Bingöl, B. (2017). Günebakan [Installation]. Nural. https://bantmag.com/4-soruda-15-istanbul-bienali-burcak-bingol/ (Access: 2 April 2025).

Çekil, C. (1986). Düzenleme No:2 [Installation]. Salt Online. https://archives.saltresearch.org/handle/123456789/49740 (Access: 25 April 2025).

Duchamp, M. (1917/1964). Fountain [Sculpture]. Tate. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573 ( Access: 23 May 2025).

Flavin, D. (1966). Roses [Sculpture]. Moma. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/82833 (Access: 25 April 2025).

Kosuth, J. (1965). ‘’One and Three Chairs’’. [Installation]. Moma, https://www.moma.org/collection/works/81435 (Access: 15 October 2025).

Kounellis, J. (1958). Fishbowl [Installation]. Walsh. https://mona.net.au/blog/2017/03/hooks (Access: 25 Mart 2025).

Kowalczyk, T. (2012). Ceramic Cardboard [Sculpture]. http://timsceramics.com/trays (Access: 13 January 2025).

Kulak, C. Y. (2025). Event Horizon. [Assembelages]. (@Copyright, Kulak).

Leach, B. (1927). Spherical Vase [Ceramic Vase]. The Garnered. https://thegarnered.com/journal/that-continuous-thing-artists-and-the-ceramics-studio-1920-today-at-tate-st-ives (Access: 14 June 2025).

Lehmann, K. (2014). Sediment Sampling [Installation]. Rodgers. https://cfileonline.org/exhibition-karin-lehmann-sediment-sampling/ (Access: 14 March 2025).

Rie, L. (1958). Squeezed Bowl [Ceramic Cup]. Artnet. http://www.artnet.com/artists/lucie-rie/squeezed-bowl-TTG_MpkvvLx0LpdYNTzbfw2 (Access: 31 June 2025).

Zabunyan, S. (1968–1969). İsimsiz [Installation]. Salt Online. https://saltonline.org/media/files/sarkis_ve_when_attitudes_become_form_tutumlar_bicime_donusunce_scrd-1.pdf (Access: 9 October 2025).

Weiwei, A. (1995). Dropping a Han Dynasty Urn [Performans]. Guggenheim Bilbao. https://www-guggenheim--bilbao-eus.translate.goog/en/learn/schools/teachers-guides/ai-weiwei-dropping-han-dynasty-urn-1995 (Access: 25 July 2025).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v10i1.684

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Yusuf Can Kulak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2026. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies (ISSN 2559 - 7914 / ISSN-L 2559 - 7914). All rights reserved.


This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.