A POSTCOLONIAL READING OF AMA ATA AIDOO'S ANOWA AND MAISHE MAPONYA'S THE HUNGRY EARTH

Ridha Rouabhia

Abstract


Literature has always been read in a variety of ways, some of which struggle to uncover the latent ideologies behind its aesthetics. Postcolonial theory is, by definition, the best in this regard. This study aimed to approach Ama Ata Aidoo's Anowa and Maishe Maponya's The Hungry Earth, and establish a comparison between them in the light of postcolonial perspectives. The method used in this study is qualitative, and the texts are taken from Gilbert's Postcolonial plays, which include a collection of contemporary plays considered by critics as masterpieces of postcolonial literature. This analysis showed that Anowa and The Hungry Earth are anti-colonial plays par excellence. They both mirror the cruelty and oppression of Western colonialism in Africa and reveal some of its colonial discourse and ideologies. They condemn and document the horrible aspects of discrimination and exploitation. Moreover, they both imply different strategies to resist colonialism, among which mimicry, hybridity, and armed fighting are the most highlighted. This study could be beneficial to students of postcolonial literature to build on it in their future studies. This study recommends the application of other literary theories in the analysis of these two plays, amongst them Feminism and Marxism. In addition to the postcolonial-oriented themes covered in this article, a sense of patriarchy, social inequality, and class distinction is also developed.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


postcolonial theory; Ama Ata Aidoo; Anowa; Maishe Maponya; The Hungry Earth; colonial discourse

Full Text:

PDF

References


a. Books

Gilbert, H. (2001). Postcolonial plays: An anthology. Routledge.

b. Journal Articles with DOIs

Sasani, S. (2015). A postcolonial reading of Pygmalion: A play of 'mimicry.' International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.238

c. Website Articles

Cherry, K. (2020, December 13). How Othering Contributes to Discrimination and Prejudice. Verywell Mind. Retrieved May 21, 2022, from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-othering-5084425

Musk, E. (2006, August 2). The secret Tesla Motors master plan (just between you and me). Retrieved September 29, 2016, from Tesla Blog website: https://www.tesla.com/blog/secret-tesla-motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me

d. Journal Articles without DOIs

Bhabha, H. (1984). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse, October, 28, p. 126.

Bin-Kapela, V. B. (2022). The symbolism of violence: A Giro-Ricoeurian reading of Frantz Fanon. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research 6(2). 225-236.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejls.v3i2.335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2023. European Journal of Literary Studies (ISSN 2601-971X / ISSN-L 2601-971X). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.