RISING AWARENESS AND SELFHOOD IN KATE CHOPIN’S ‘THE AWAKENING’ AND ‘THE GOLDEN NOTEBOOK’ BY DORIS LESSING

Mercy Ezeala, Regina Rudaityte

Abstract


The postmodern idea of the self as fragmented and decentred in contrast with earlier traditions’ idea of a rational, stable and autonomous self has great implications in the positionality of the woman in patriarchal discourse. This study applied a close reading of The Awakening and The Golden Notebook based on ideas from the new French feminist’s theories of Kristeva, Cixous and Irigaray that indicate that the woman whose patriarchal discourses of Freud and Lacan placed outside the Symbolic, outside language has the resources to re-position and write herself as a subject. The paper used the ‘signification process’ by Kristeva, supported by ideas from the discourses of Irigaray and Cixous, to trace the woman’s progress through abjection into destabilising patriarchal representations of the female and rewriting herself. The female protagonists destabilised their entrenched representations, re-invented their own idea of femininity and affirmed The Awakening and The Golden Notebook as L’ecriture feminine (feminine writing).

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

Keywords


selfhood/subjectivity; signification process; L’ecriture feminine; The Awakening; The Golden Notebook

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, G. 2000. The New Critical Idiom. London & New York: Routledge.

Beauvoir, S. d. 1979. The Second Sex. Trans. H. M. Parshley, New York: Vintage.

Cavallaro, D. 2003. French Feminist Theory: An Introduction. New York: Continuum.

Cixous, H. 1976. The laugh of the Medusa. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(4), 875-893.

Chopin, K. 1984. The Awakening. New York: Penguin.

Degler, C. 1974. What ought to be and what was: women's sexuality in the 19th century. The American Historical Review, 79(5), 1467-1490.

Freud, S. 1913. The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. A. Brill. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Gilbert, S. 1983. The Second Coming of Aphrodite: Kate Chopin's Fantasy of Desire. Kenyon Review, 5(3), 42-46.

Hall, D. E. 2004. Subjectivity. New York & London: Routledge.

Irigaray, L.1985. This Sex Which Is Not one. Trans. C. Porter, & C. Burke. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

______1996. I Love to You: Sketch of a Possible Felicity in History. Trans. Martin. New York: Routledge.

Lacan, J. 1982. Feminine Sexuality. J. Mitchell & J. Rose,( Eds). Trans. J. Rose. New York: Norton.

______ 2002. Ecrits: A Selection. Trans. B. Fink. New York: Norton.

Kristeva, J. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. L. Roudiez, (ed.), Trans, T. Gorg, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.

______1982. The Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. L. S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.

______1984. Revolution in Poetic Language. Trans. M. Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.

______1986. The Kristeva Reader. T. Moi (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

______1986b. A Question of subjectivity. Women's Review: an interview, 12, 19-22.

______2000. The Sense and Non-sense of Revolt: The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 1. Trans. Herman. New York: Columbia University Press.

Lessing, D. 2014. The Golden Notebook. London: Fourth Estate.

Moi, T. 1985. Sexual/Textual Politics. London & New York: Routledge.

Weedon, C. 1987. Feminist Practice and Post-structuralist Theory. New York: Blackwell Publishers.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2018-2023. European Journal of Literary Studies (ISSN 2601-971X / ISSN-L 2601-971X). All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.