DREI MODELLE DER LEXIKALISCHEN ORGANISATION IN DER BILINGUALEN SPRACHPRODUKTION: SEPARATE-LEXIKON-, SHARED-LEXIKON- UND INTERAKTIONISTISCHES MODELL IN DER KONZEPTUALISIERUNG EINER DAF-LEHRVERANSTALTUNG AN DER UNIVERSITÄT SPLIT
Abstract
Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt drei einflussreiche Modelle der lexikalischen Organisation in der bilingualen bzw. L2-gestützten Sprachproduktion vor und berichtet über ihre Konzeptualisierung im Rahmen der Lehrveranstaltung Modelle der Sprachproduktion an der Abteilung für Germanistik der Universität Split im Studienjahr 2025/2026 mit einer Kohorte von 14 Studierenden. Die drei Modelle — das Separate-Lexikon-Modell, das Shared-Lexikon-Modell (de Bot, 1992) und das Interaktionistische Modell (Kroll et al., 2006; Costa et al., 2006) — werden zunächst theoretisch entfaltet und anschließend an einem Aufgabenformat operationalisiert, in dem 30 alltagssprachliche Beispielsätze den drei Modellen zugeordnet werden sollen. Das Aufgabenformat wurde so konstruiert, dass es die zentralen Diagnostika der jeweiligen Modelle sichtbar macht: strikte kontextuelle Trennung der Sprachen, gemeinsame lexikalische Aktivierung mit Code-Switching auf Wortebene und dynamische Interaktion zwischen Lexikon und Syntax über die Sprachgrenze hinweg. Der Beitrag vertritt die These, dass eine didaktisch strukturierte Gegenüberstellung der drei Modelle den Studierenden nicht nur ermöglicht, scheinbare Widersprüche in der empirischen Literatur aufzulösen, sondern auch ein diagnostisches Instrument für die Analyse von Selbstkorrekturen und Monitoring-Prozessen in der eigenen L2-Produktion bereitstellt. Damit schlägt der Artikel eine Brücke zwischen der psycholinguistischen Theoriebildung und der DaF-Didaktik und reagiert zugleich auf das Desiderat einer stärker theoriegestützten Ausbildung von Lehramtsstudierenden im südslavischen Kontext.
This article presents three influential models of lexical organization in bilingual and L2-assisted speech production and reports on their conceptualization in the course Modelle der Sprachproduktion at the Department of German Studies, University of Split (academic year 2025/2026, cohort n = 14). The three models — the Separate Lexicon Model, the Shared Lexicon Model (de Bot, 1992), and the Interactionist Model (Kroll et al., 2006; Costa et al., 2006) — are first expounded theoretically and then operationalized through a classification task in which thirty everyday sentences must be assigned to one of the three models. The task format was designed to make the central diagnostics of each model visible: strict contextual separation of languages, shared lexical activation with word-level code-switching, and dynamic interaction between lexicon and syntax across the language boundary. The article argues that a didactically structured juxtaposition of the three models enables students not only to resolve apparent contradictions in the empirical literature but also to develop a diagnostic instrument for analyzing self-corrections and monitoring processes in their own L2 production. Thereby, the article bridges psycholinguistic theory-building and L2 German didactics, and responds to the desideratum of a more theory-informed education of pre-service teachers in the Southern Slavic context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bot, K., 1992. Applied Linguistics. A bilingual production model: Levelt's 'speaking' model adapted. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.1.1
Costa, A. & Caramazza, A., 1999. Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bilingualism-language-and-cognition/article/abs/is-lexical-selection-in-bilingual-speech-production-languagespecific-further-evidence-from-spanishenglish-and-englishspanish-bilinguals/550BDBF67C2EE92CE3186BD325201FF2
Costa, A., Roelstraete, B. & Hartsuiker, R. J., 2006. The lexical bias effect in bilingual speech production: Evidence for feedback between lexical and sublexical levels across languages. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213911
French, R. M. & Jacquet, M., 2004. Understanding bilingual memory: models and data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.011
Hanulová, J., Davidson, D. J. & Indefrey, P., 2010. Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.509946
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M. & Guo, T., 2008. Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.001
Müller, M. & Kovač, M., 2022. Monitoring — key factor in the development of fluent speech: Case study of German as a foreign language. Govor: časopis za fonetiku, 39, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.22210/govor.2022.39.06
Schastak, M., 2020. Bilinguale Interaktion beim Peer-Learning in der Grundschule. Eine Mixed-Methods Studie mit bilingual türkisch-deutschsprachig aufwachsenden Schüler*innen. Retrieved from https://shop.budrich.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2378-schastak.pdf
Williams, S. & Hammarberg, B., 1998. Language Switches in L3 Production: Implications for a Polyglot Speaking Model. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748635115.003.0003
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmts.v6i1.729
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2020-2026. European Journal of Multilingualism and Translation Studies (ISSN 2734 - 5475 / ISSN-L 2734 - 5475). All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.



