ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: CASE STUDY OF NZOIA SUGAR COMPANY
Abstract
The idea of technological capabilities plays a key role in the analysis of organizational processes because it offers a potential solution to the quest for sustained competitive advantage through the realization of organizations objectives. The importance of technological capabilities suggests that the long-term, continuous renewal of the firm rests on both the exploitation of existing capabilities for the furtherance of the institutions objectives. This is mainly achieved by the creation and development of specific organizational capabilities. This study therefore, sought to evaluate the effects of technological capabilities in Nzoia Sugar Company Limited. The study was based on the Resource Based View Theory. A case study and survey designs were employed in this research. The study targeted a total of 1,403 employees comprising of 790 lower level employees, 422 Supervisory level employees, 182 middle level management and nine top level management. Random stratified sampling technique was used to select 210 respondents. Data collection instruments comprised of questionnaires and interview schedules. Validity was determined by content validity and reliability using Cronbach alpha method which had Cronbach Alpha Coefficient of 0.783 which was greater than 0.7. Data was collected and analyzed using descriptive while inferential statistics at 95% confidence level. The results were presented in form of frequency tables and pie charts. It was concluded that an increase in customer service management capability constructs like repeat purchase, confidentially of customer information and different customer needs once enhanced could translate to higher firm performance; attributes of marketing capabilities like employee training on basic marketing skills, e-marketing and marketing intelligence information should be enhanced; internet penetration, automation of processes, use of e-marketing and procurement could lead to improved firm performance and setting targets for the company which are attainable, monitoring and evaluation of all activities would lead to improved firm performance. The findings of this study shall be useful to the policy makers, strategists and the researcher in making informed conclusions and recommendations. The findings shall give guidance to the managers of different departments in coming up with proper policies in management. The stakeholders in management will find the study useful in identifying challenges faced by Firms who do not invest and emphasize on organizational capabilities.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Aberdeen Group. (2001). Customer value management; keeping profitable customers on board.
Aimilia, P., & Yannis, C. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance.
Amburgey, T. L., & Rao, H. (1996). Organizational Ecology, past present and future directions. Academy of management journal (39,5)1265_1286
Amit, R., & Shoemaker, P. J. H., (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 1: pp.33-46.
Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT Assets, Organizational capability and firm perform: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation, (18:5)
Aral, S., & Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). strategic answers and organizational rent: Strategic management journal (14:1) 33_46
Arnold, E., & Touriax, B. (1991). Developing Firms Technological capabilities Mimeo Brighton Technopolis
Baldwin, C., & Clerk, K. (1991). Capabilities and Capital investment, New Perspectives in capital Budgeting Harvard Business School, working paper 92-004.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1): pp.99-120.
Barnsley J. B., Wright, M., & Ketcher, D. J. (2001)The resource based view of the Firm Journal of management 27:625_641
Battle, F. (2004). Customer relationship management: concepts and tools, Elsevier, Oxford
Beer. M., & Eisentat, R. A. (2000). The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning: Sloan management, review summer 29-42.
Bharandwaj, A. S., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmood, R. W. (1999). IT capabilities Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization in proceedings of the 20th international conference on information systems, Charlotte, North Carolina 378_385
Bharandwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance, an empirical investigation MIS Quarterly (Strategy implementation. European Journal of Marketing 38 73-98.
Bharandwaj, A. (2000). A resource based view perspective on Information Technology and Firm Performance: An empirical investigation, MIS quarterly
(24;1)pop 169_196.
Branzei, O., Vertinsky, I. (2006). Strategic pathways to marketing capabilities in SMEs, Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 1: pp.75-105
Brown, J., & Pope, V. (2001). Best practices in strategy implementation: Learning from the best experts, Greenleaf Book Group press: New York.
Boulding, W., Staelin, R., & Johnson, W. (2005) A customer relationship management roadmap what is known, potential Pitfalls and where to go. Journal of marketing (69:4) 155-168.
Buul, M. (2010). Successful strategy implementation: A job for the internal auditor
Cannon, J.T. (1968). Business strategy and policy; Brace and World New York
Harcourt Carr, N.G. (2004). Does IT matter: Information technology and the corrosion of Competitive advantage, Harvard Business school press Boston, USA.
Catherine, N. L., &Valerie, A. (nd.). Return on marketing, using customer equity Focus marketing strategy, Journal of marketing strategy 68(1)109_127
Celuch, K. G., Kasouf, C. J., & Peruvemba, V. (2002). The effects of perceived market and learning orientation on assessed organizational capabilities, Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp.545-554.
Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986). Measuring Strategic performance, strategic Management journal 1 (5) 437-458.
Chimnazzi, J. (2004). The impact of marketing /HR interactions on marketing
Cho, H., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value, Strategic Management Journal, 26: pp.555-575.
Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing
constructs, Journal of marketing research (26:2) 64-73.
Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of the market driven organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58, 1: pp.37-52.
Day, G. S., & Van Due, B. (2002). Superiority in customer relationship management, consequences of competitive advantage & performance, Cambridge MA marketing Science institute
Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S.G. (2000). Introduction nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities.
Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A.C., Woo, C.Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest?
Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms, Adm. Science Quarterly, 42, 4: pp.750-783.
Gupta, S., & Donald, R. (2003). Customers as Assets, Journal of interactive Marketing 17(1) 9_24
Handy, C. (1987). The making of managers, A report on education, training and
development.
Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S. Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. and Winter, S. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kobinski, H. (2002).The challenges of strategy implementation. The conference board executive action and control. Burr Ridge, Illinois
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm combinative capabilities and the replication of technology; organization science 3,383_397.
Kolks, U. (1990). Strategy implementation; a user oriented conception (A masters thesis) submitted to the University of Gieben, Germany
Lopez-Cabrales, A., Vale, R., Herrero, I. (2006). The contribution of core employees to organizational capabilities and efficiency, Human Resource Management, 45,1: pp.81-109.
Mabey, C., & Ramirez, M. (2003). Does management development improve firm Productivity?
Macher, J. T. and Mowery, D.C. (2009). Measuring Dynamic Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing. British Journal of Management, 20, S41–S62.
Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.
Mankins, M. C., & Steel, R. (2005). Tuning great strategy into great performance Harvard Business Review July August pp. 64-73
Marketing, U. K. (2000).The problem of CRM under delivery Marketing UK.
Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L. & Barnsley, J B. (1995). Information Technology Sustainable competitive Advantage, A Resource Based Analysis MIS quarterly 19:4 487_505
Mc Kelvie, A., Davidsson, P. (2009). From resource base to dynamic capabilities: an investigation of new firms, British Journal of Management, V.20, pp.63-80.
Mohammed, R. (2008). Strategic performance and measurement system and
Organization capabilities; Using Levers of control Framework.
Mundy, J. (2009). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems.
Newbert, S.L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research, Strategic Management Journal, 28; pp.121-146.
Payne, A., and Furrow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management, Journal of Marketing (69:4) 167_191
Piccolo, G., & AIves, B. (2005). IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained
Competitive advantage: A René and synthesis of literature, mid Quarterly, 29:4,747_777.
Piercy, N.F. (1998). Marketing implementation, the implications of marketing paradigm weaknesses for the strategy execution, Academy of Marketing Science, Journal, 26, 222-236.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage free press New York.
Song, M.C., Benedetto, A., Nason, R.W. (2007). Capabilities and financial performance; The moderating effect of strategic type, J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., 35: pp.18-34.
Spanos, Y. E., Prastacos, G. (2004). Understanding organizational capabilities: towards a conceptual framework, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8,3: pp.31-43.
Tamkin, P., & Hirsh, W. (2003). Chore to champions; the making of better people
managers
Teece, D. J., Pisandat, G., & Shven, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal 18,509_533.
Verona, G., and Ravasi, D. (2003). Unbundling dynamic capabilities: An exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 577–606.
Wirowitz, J. (nd). The successful implementation of strategies in the modern business environment, Journal of International Business Administration pop 234_256
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v0i0.206
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Kennedy Ntabo Otiso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
