RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN KHAZAR UNIVERSITY, AZERBAIJAN

Atamoghlan Gharabaghi

Abstract


The purpose of the article is to determine the relationship between organizational culture and social responsibility in Khazar University, Azerbaijan. The population of the study comprises management employees, faculty staff and students as well as representatives of neighborhood associations. The results show that there is a directly proportional relationship between the moderate elements of culture and social responsibility of university under study; a situation which explains the strong positive relationship. Considering these findings, a number of strategic guidelines suggested addressed to four categories: performance, education, and social cognitive and epistemological. It was concluded that there are deficiencies in the presence of elements such as beliefs, values, rituals, language and history; aspects which contributes on reflecting the staff perception toward a moderately weak corporate culture.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


social environment, organizational culture, organizational values, social responsibility

References


Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2 ed.). New York: Wile

McGregor, D. M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov.Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2010

Chiavenato, Idalberto (2000). Human Resource Management. 5th Edition Colombia

Shein, Edgar (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gallo, Miguel (2000). The company, management and administration. Superior business management course. Volume 3. Place Editores, SA University of Navarra

Guédez, Victor (2006). Ethics and practice of Corporate Social Responsibility. The contribution of the company to the capital. Collection Management Issues. Editorial Planeta Venezuela Venezolana SA

Thompson, Arthur and Strickland, A. (2004). Strategic Management. Editorial Mc Graw-Hill. Mexico

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). "A theory of human motivation". Psychological Review 50: 370–396.

Greenberg, J (1987). "A taxonomy of organizational justice theories". Academy of Management Review 12: 9–22.

Herzberg, F. (1968, January/February). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 52-62.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA, England: Lexington Books/D C Heath and Com.f

Milocco, M. (2003). Green Paper. European Union

Robbins, Stephen (2004). Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Mexico

Bateman, Thomas and Snell, Scott (2001). Administration. A Competitive Advantage. 4th Edition, Mc Mexico. Graw Hill

Collins, James and Porras, Jerry (2000) . Companies that endure. Basic Principles of visionary companies.Paidós, Barcelona

Greenhaus, J. H.; Beutell, N. J. (1985). "Sources and conflict between work and family roles". Academy of Management Review 10 (1): 76–88.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v0i0.21

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Atamoghlan Gharabaghi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017-2023. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies (ISSN 2501 - 9988) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.