THE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY ENABLES POLICYMAKERS TO LEGISLATE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Konstantinos T. Kotsis

Abstract


This research emphasises the significance of scientific literacy for policymakers about the future trajectory of artificial intelligence. The ethical concerns surrounding the development of artificial intelligence are of utmost importance due to its potential social effect. Integrating AI systems into many sectors of society, such as healthcare and banking, necessitates adherence to ethical principles. Strict ethical frameworks must be implemented alongside the development of AI to safeguard against biases, privacy infringement, and ethical shortcomings. Researchers, developers, and policymakers must exercise constant vigilance to address concerns about transparency, accountability, and justice in AI systems. The ethical ramifications of artificial intelligence (AI) transcend technology, including significant ethical considerations for both people and society. Active engagement in ethical deliberations among stakeholders involved in AI development is of utmost importance to guarantee AI's responsible and sustainable deployment. This is a pivotal element in realising the whole potential of AI for the betterment of society. Politicians must comprehensively understand the scientific ideas behind AI to enact legislation in this field effectively.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


artificial intelligence, policymakers, scientific literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aizenberg, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2020). Designing for human rights in AI. Big Data & Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720949566

Ala-Pietilä, P., & Smuha, N.A. (2021). A Framework for Global Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence and Its Governance. In: Braunschweig, B., Ghallab, M. (eds) Reflections on Artificial Intelligence for Humanity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Cham, vol 12600, 237-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69128-8_15

Andresen, S. L. (2002). John McCarthy: father of AI. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(5), 84-85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2002.1039837

Ayub Khan, A., Laghari, A. A., & Ahmed Awan, S. (2021). Machine Learning in Computer Vision: A Review. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 8(32), e4. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-4-2021.169418

Ben-Horin, H., Kali, Y., & Tal, T. (2023). The Fifth Dimension in Socio-Scientific Reasoning: Promoting Decision-Making about Socio-Scientific Issues in a Community. Sustainability, 15(12), 9708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129708

Bhandari, M. P. (2023). The fundamental principles of social sciences. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(2).73-86.2023

Brauner, P., Hick, A., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2023). What does the public think about artificial intelligence? A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, 1113903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903

Buhmann, A., & Fieseler, C. (2023). Deep learning meets deep democracy: Deliberative governance and responsible innovation in artificial intelligence. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(1), 146-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.42

Chiappetta, A. (2023). Navigating the AI frontier: European parliamentary insights on bias and regulation, preceding the AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.4.1733

Coulthart, S., Shahriar Hossain, M., Sumrall, J., Kampe, C., & Vogel, K. M. (2024). Data-science literacy for future security and intelligence professionals. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 19(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2023.2187705

Dirgová Luptáková, I., Pospíchal, J., Huraj, L. (2024). Beyond Code and Algorithms: Navigating Ethical Complexities in Artificial Intelligence. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P. (eds) Software Engineering Methods in Systems and Network Systems. CoMeSySo 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 934. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54813-0_30

Duncan, R., Robson-Williams, M., & Edwards, S. (2020). A close examination of brokers’ role and needed expertise in bridging and building science policy boundaries in environmental decision making. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0448-x

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Dwivedi, Y. K., Jeyaraj, A., Hughes, L., Davies, G. H., Ahuja, M., Albashrawi, M. A., ... & Walton, P. (2024). “Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice–Making a difference in industry, policy, and society. International Journal of Information Management, 102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102750

Feijóo, C., Kwon, Y., Bauer, J. M., Bohlin, E., Howell, B., Jain, R., ... & Xia, J. (2020). Harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) to increase wellbeing for all: The case for a new technology diplomacy. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101988

Fogel, D. B. (2022). Defining artificial intelligence. Machine Learning and the City: Applications in Architecture and Urban Design, 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch7

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdpr-info.eu/

Huang, L., Peissl, W. (2023). Artificial Intelligence—A New Knowledge and Decision-Making Paradigm? In: Hennen, L., Hahn, J., Ladikas, M., Lindner, R., Peissl, W., van Est, R. (eds) Technology Assessment in a Globalized World. Springer, (pp. 175-201), Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10617-0_9

Hudson, A. D., Finn, E., & Wylie, R. (2023). What can science fiction tell us about the future of artificial intelligence policy? AI & Society, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01273-2

König, P. D., Wurster, S., & Siewert, M. B. (2023). Sustainability challenges of artificial intelligence and Citizens' regulatory preferences. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101863

Kotsis, K.T., (2024). Scientific Literacy is A Valuable Tool for Modern Politicians. A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal on Political Sciences & International Relations, 2(1), 1-5. SRC/JPSIR-110. https://doi.org/10.47363/JPSIR/2024(2)104

Kronivets, T., Yakovenko, O., Tymoshenko, Y., & Ilnytskyi, M. (2024). Dimensions of legal and moral use of artificial intelligence in education. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(00), e25. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v5i00.25

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976

Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S. J., Ogata, H., ... & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820

Meneceur, Y. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law. In: Suksi, M. (eds) The Rule of Law and Automated Decision-Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30142-1_6

Michal, A. L., Zhong, Y., & Shah, P. (2021). When and why do people act on flawed science? Effects of anecdotes and prior beliefs on evidence-based decision-making. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00293-2

Molina, Ó.A., Bernal, M.J., Wolf, D.L., & Herreros, B. (2024). What is Spanish regulation on the application of artificial intelligence to medicine like? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02565-2

Muggleton, S. (2014). Alan Turing and the development of Artificial Intelligence. AI Communications, 27(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-130579

Nagarhalli, T. P., Vaze, V., & Rana, N. K. (2021). Impact of machine learning in natural language processing: A review. In 2021 third international conference on intelligent communication technologies and virtual mobile networks (ICICV) (pp. 1529-1534). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICV50876.2021.9388380

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Science Education, Committee on Science Literacy and Public Perception of Science. 2016. Science Literacy. National Academies Press.

O’Shaughnessy, M. R., Schiff, D. S., Varshney, L. R., Rozell, C. J., & Davenport, M. A. (2023). What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence adoption and governance? Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac056

Osborne, J. (2023). Science, scientific literacy, and science education. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 785–816). Routledge.

Osborne, J., & Pimentel, D. (2023). Science education in an age of misinformation. Science Education, 107(3), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21790

Sankarnarayanan, T., Paciorkowski, L., Parikh, K., Hamilton-Fletcher, G., Feng, C., Sheng, D., Hudson, T.E., Rizzo, J., & Chan, K.C. (2023). Training AI to Recognize Objects of Interest to the Blind and Low Vision Community. 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340454

Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review. Cognitive Robotics, 3, 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001

Stahl, B. C., Rodrigues, R., Santiago, N., & Macnish, K. (2022). A European Agency for Artificial Intelligence: Protecting fundamental rights and ethical values. Computer Law & Security Review, 45, 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105661

Starke, C., & Lünich, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence for political decision-making in the European Union: Effects on citizens’ perceptions of input, throughput, and output legitimacy. Data & Policy, 2, e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2020.19

Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159

Straub, V. J., Morgan, D., Bright, J., & Margetts, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101881

Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377

Tasquier, G., Knain, E., & Jornet, A. (2022). Scientific Literacies for Change Making: Equipping the Young to Tackle Current Societal Challenges. Frontiers in Education, 7, 689329. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.689329

Tinnirello, M. (Ed.). (2022). The global politics of artificial intelligence. CRC Press.

Udvaros, J., & Forman, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence and Education 4.0. In INTED2023 proceedings (pp. 6309-6317). https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.1670

Ulnicane, I., & Aden, A. (2023). Power and politics in framing bias in Artificial Intelligence policy. Review of Policy Research, 40(5), 665-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12567

Umer, F., & Adnan, N., (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: synthetic datasets in dentistry. BDJ Open 10, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00198-4

Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation: Critical perspectives about science participation and emancipation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., ... & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-10. 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1237-1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1871398

Weingart, P., Joubert, M., & Connoway, K. (2021). Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy. PloS one, 16(7), e0254201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254201

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Sturm, B. J. (2020). The dark sides of artificial intelligence: An integrated AI governance framework for public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 818-829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851

Wischmeyer, T., & Rademacher, T. (Eds.). (2020). Regulating artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 307-321). Cham: Springer.

Wróbel, I. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence systems and the right to good administration. Review of European and Comparative Law, 49(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.13616

Zekos, G. (2022). Political, economic and legal effects of artificial intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94736-1




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpss.v7i1.1682

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Konstantinos T. Kotsis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017 - 2023. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.