POLITICAL AWARENESS AND RESILIENCE TO MALICIOUS INFORMATION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: COGNITION, ATTITUDE, DIGITAL BEHAVIOR, AND EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS AT AN GIANG UNIVERSITY, VIETNAM

Nguyen Ho Thanh, Truong Thanh Hai, Trinh Van Thanh

Abstract


Social media is an important arena of political socialization for university students, but it also increases exposure to misleading, decontextualized, and emotionally manipulative information. This study examines students’ political awareness and resilience to malicious information through the relationships among political cognition, political attitude, and digital political behavior. A mixed-methods design combined document analysis, a survey of 300 full-time students from eight faculties at An Giang University conducted from January to March 2026, and interviews with 12 students and four Youth Union/Student Association officers. The questionnaire comprised 19 items measured on a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression in SPSS 26.0. Political cognition reached M = 4.44 (SD = 0.70), political attitude M = 4.42 (SD = 0.69), and digital political behavior M = 4.12 (SD = 0.81). Although 79.3% of respondents could recognize distorted content, only 65.0% reported responding to or flagging it. Attitude was significantly associated with behavior (r = .52, p < .01) and remained a significant predictor in the regression model (β = .45, p < .001), which explained 36.0% of behavioral variance. Cognition was not a significant direct predictor after controlling for attitude (β = .12, p = .08). The findings reveal an awareness–action gap and support political education that integrates critical media literacy, evidence-based discussion, and responsible digital civic practice on election quality misreads the institutional preconditions of consolidation.

Keywords


political awareness, malicious information, political attitude, digital political behavior, media literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

Tran, V. T. G. L. (2021). Fake news: How to identify and prevent it. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 10(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.52714/DThU.10.2.2021.860

Tran, T., Ho, M.-T., Pham, T.-H., Nguyen, M.-H., Nguyen, K.-L. P., Vuong, T.-T., Nguyen, T.-H. T., Nguyen, T.-D., Nguyen, T.-L., Khuc, Q., La, V.-P., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2020). How digital natives learn and thrive in the digital age: Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainability, 12(9), 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093819

Do, H. V., Bui, T. T., Tran, D. H., Nguyen, H. T., & Dinh, L. D. (2026). Developing and validating an AI literacy scale for university students in Vietnam. IFLA Journal, 52(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251385058

Nguyen, H. T. (2025). Assessing An Giang University students’ awareness of national construction and defense. Tan Trao University Journal of Science, 11(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.51453/3093-3076/1366

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pnr2

Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political system: Origins of political legitimacy. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Children_in_the_Political_System.html?id=ToKDAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

McGuire, W. J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067

Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5, 65. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9

McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, 103711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711

Guess, A. M., Lerner, M., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., & Sircar, N. (2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536–15545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117

UNESCO. (2021). Media and information literate citizens: Think critically, click wisely! UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/media-and-information-literate-citizens-think-critically-click-wisely

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?id=0R9ZswEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

National Assembly of Vietnam. (2018). Law on Cybersecurity No. 24/2018/QH14. Retrieved from https://english.luatvietnam.vn/law-no-24-2018-qh14-dated-june-12-2018-of-the-national-assembly-on-cybersecurity-164904-doc1.html

Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2018). Resolution No. 35-NQ/TW dated October 22, 2018, on strengthening the protection of the Party’s ideological foundation and countering erroneous and hostile viewpoints in the new situation.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejpss.v9i3.2308

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Ho Thanh, Truong Thanh Hai, Trinh Van Thanh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2017 - 2026. European Journal Of Political Science Studies (ISSN 2601-2766) is a registered trademark. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.