Memory Mandiudza


Although there is a demand for the requirement for natural sciences skills, to date, the connection between natural sciences subject choices and their impact on female students’ educational pathways has not been widely studied. Natural sciences include Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Computer Science and Geography. In this paper we therefore investigate the factors that motivate Zimbabwean female students to choose natural sciences at university. The main body of data for the research was generated through semi-structured interviews. The preliminary results reflect that there are three are the main factors that motivated female students in the sample to choose natural sciences programmes: (1) self-efficacy, ability (2) the influence of their female teachers, relatives, parents and friends (3) relevance of natural sciences. Hence these three factors promote the constitution of a natural science identity, which in turn motivates the choice of natural sciences as a career female amongst female students.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


female natural science students, Masvingo students, natural science identity

Full Text:



Aguele, L. I., & Agwagah, U. N. A. (2007). Female participation in science, technology and mathematics (STM) education in Nigeria and national development. Journal of Social Sciences, 15, 121–126.

Allen, C. D., & Eisenhart, M. (2017). Fighting for desired versions of a future self: How young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 407–436 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1294985.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3.

Bottia, M., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002

Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458.

Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218-261.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed). Harlow: Pearson.

Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? - Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199-210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Gilbert, N. (2011). Researching social life. London: Sage Publications.

Gudyanga, A. (2017). Zimbabwean female participation in physics: The use of drawings in documenting students' images of scientists. Review of Social Sciences, 02(01), 18-35.

Anna Gudyanga, A., Mandizvidza, V., Gudyanga, E. (2016). Participation of rural Zimbabwean female students in mathematics: The influence of perception. Cogent education

Herzig, A. H. (2004). “Slaughtering this beautiful math”: Graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Education, 16(3), 379–395.

Hill, T. P., & Rogers, E. (2012). Gender gaps in science: The creativity factor. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 34(2), 19-26.

Holmegaard, H. T., Ulriksen, L. M., & Madsen, L. M. (2012). The process of choosing what to study: A longitudinal study of upper secondary students’ identity work when choosing higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Advanced online publication. Doi: 10.1080/00313831.2012.696212

Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284-301.pp 284–30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.

Linnansaari, J., Viljaranta, J., Lavonen, J., Schneider, B., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). Finnish students’ engagement in science lessons. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(2), 192–206 Retrieved from https://www.journals.uio.no/index.php/nordina/article/view/2047.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.

Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. 2011. Designing qualitative research (5th Ed). Los Angles: Sage Publications.

Masanja, V. G. (2010). Increasing women’s participation in science, mathematics and technology education and employment in Africa. Paper presented at the United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW, part of UN Women) & United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Expert group, meeting Gender, Science and Technology, Paris: Special project on Scientific, Technical and Vocational Education of Girls in Africa.

Mendick, H. (2005). Mathematical stories: why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 225–241.

O’Hara, K. (2010). Tracing students’ mathematical identity in an online synchronous environment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Education. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitude towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079 Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0950069032000032199.

Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193–203 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193.

Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. C. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Parker, P., Marsh, H., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology,

Palmer, T. A., Burke, P. F., & Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: A study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645–662 Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949.

Perez, T., Cromley, J., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329 Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/a0034027.

Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2008). Images of mathematicians: a new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers. ZDM, 40(4), 633-646.

Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615-1636.

Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, N., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 40 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0137-

Silverman, D. 2010. Doing qualitative research. (3rd Ed). London: Sage Publications.

Slavit, D., Nelson, T. H., & Lesseig, K. (2016). The teachers’ role in developing, opening, and nurturing an inclusive STEM-focused school. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 7 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0040-5.

Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 171-183.

Stine, D. D., & Matthews, C. M. (2009). The U.S. Science and Technology Workforce. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34539.pdf

Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017364

Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 48 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5.

Vurayai, S. (2012). Equity principle in mathematics education: Focus on ordinary mathematics. London: Lambert Academic.

Wang, M., & Degol, J. (2016). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140 Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x.pdf

Williams, C., Stanisstrect, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324–329.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v6i2.1001

Copyright (c) 2021 Memory Mandiudza

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2015 - 2018. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.


Hit counter