VIETNAM'S CONFLICT RESOLUTION STRATEGY IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA: DIALOGUE AND MEDIA OVER LEGAL ACTION

Do Thuy Dung Phan

Abstract


Territorial disputes in the South China Sea can be seen as one of the most complex issues among states in the contemporary world due to the involvement of many parties. However, despite the presence of peaceful conflict resolutions, which are regulated under international law, the positive result is still miles apart. This article examines why the Vietnamese Government does not choose to bring the dispute to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is regarded as a legal action to solve the conflict between the two countries, as the Philippines did. Instead, remedies such as dialogue and media take precedence over all others. In the end, the settlement for both countries, based on the model of Peter Wallensteen in the South China Sea, is also discussed. The author approaches the South China Sea dispute between Vietnam and China from realism and neo-liberalism's perspective and will collect the primary data from legal sources, official statements and secondary data in an effort to examine the strategic decisions of the Vietnamese Government toward China concerning the territorial dispute. The paper's finding reveals that legal action is less likely to be used by the Vietnamese Government to tackle conflict in the South China Sea due to the limitations of international law, the asymmetrical and interdependent Vietnam - Sino relations throughout history, and the strategic foreign policy of Vietnamese Government towards China. There is a tendency that the Vietnam Government will keep negotiating with China by using peaceful resolutions such as dialogue and media. At the same time, the Vietnam Government will draw attention from international communities against China's assertiveness for not complying with international law as well as strengthen external defense with other powers. Using the international court will be the last resort in solving the territorial conflict between Vietnam and China.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


South China Sea, territorial dispute, lawsuit, peaceful conflict resolution

Full Text:

PDF

References


MEAB. (2005). Ecosystem and Human Well-being; Biodivesrsity Synthesis Report. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.

CBD. (2006). Global Biodiversity Outlook 2 Assessment Report. Montreal: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

FAO. (2005). GlobalForest Resources Assessment Update 2OO5, Terms and Definitions; Working Pp.83 . Rome, Italy: FAO.

GoK. (2010). Ntional Environment Action Plan (NEAP) 2009-2013; Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources. Nairobi: Government Printers.

UNEP . (2009a). Kenya; Atlas of Our Changing Environment. Nairobi: UNEP.

UNEP. (2011). Emerging Perspective on Forest Diversity. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.

CBD. (2010). Biodiversity is Our Life; Gicana 7 Report. Montreal: The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

FAO. (2009). Forest and the Global Economy. United Nations; Rome: FAO.

GoK. (2010). The Constitution of the Republic of Kenya 2010. Nairobi: Government Printers.

UNEP. (1995). Global Biodiversity Assessment Report; Press Release. Washington DC: World Resource Institute.

Myers. (1988). Tropical Forest and Their Species, Going, going...? Washington DC: Biodiversity National Academy Press.

Corker, B. (2003). Biodiversity and Conservation.

Bendall, R. (1996). Biodiversity; The Follow-up to Rio. Washington DC: Cambridge University Press.

FAO. (2010). Global Forest Resources Assesment 2010 ; FAO Forestry Pp. 163. Rome Italy: FAO.

Ozturk. (2002). An Overview of Plant Diversity Landuse and Degradation in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Environmental Management and Health Vol. 13 No. 5., 442-449.

Tran, T. (2018, July 30). [Indo-Pacific Focus] Policy Brief No.5 Territorial and Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea and Vietnam’s Policy. Retrieved from The Japan Institute of International Affairs: https://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/article_page.php?id=8

Ho, T. B. (2019, Apr 20). Tại sao nên kiện Trung Quốc ra tòa quốc tế về chủ quyền Biển Đông? Retrieved from Nghiên Cứu Quốc Tế: http://nghiencuuquocte.org/2019/04/20/kien-trung-quoc-ra-toa-quoc-te-chu-quyen-bien-dong/

Phan, H. (2014, May 10). 'Việt Nam nên kiện Trung Quốc ra Tòa án quốc tế'. Retrieved from Vietnam Net: https://vietnamnet.vn/vn/tuanvietnam/viet-nam-nen-kien-trung-quoc-ra-toa-an-quoc-te-174731.html

Crispin, S. (2016, Aug 03). The Diplomat. Retrieved 10 2022, from Đất Việt: https://thediplomat.com/2016/08/will-vietnam-file-a-south-china-sea-case-against-china/

Wallensteen, P. (2002). Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System. London: SAGE.

Morgenthau, H. (1985). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Boonpriwan, L. (2012). The South China Sea dispute: evolution, conflict management and resolution. Retrieved from Thammasan University Digital Collections : http://203.131.219.242/cdm/compoundobject/collection/thesis/id/27897/rec/14

Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology a step by step guide. Singapore: SAGE.

Vanderstoep, S., & Johnston, D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approache. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Perlez, J. (2014, Jul 16). New York Times. Retrieved from ProQuest: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1941487064/fulltextPDF/F8D0D97742A04AE8PQ/1?accountid=27656

Stinson, N. (2017, Dec 16). Express (Online). Retrieved from ProQuest: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1977613243/fulltext/F526E3DE74044759PQ/2?accountid=27656

Thai, C. (2014, Mar 14). Tranh chấp Biển Đông và vai trò của VN. Retrieved from BBC: https://www.bbc.com/vietnamese/forum/2014/03/140314_vietnam_role_scs_conflict

Pedrozo , R. (2014, August). A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea. Retrieved from CNA: https://www.cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/IOP-2014-U-008433.pdf

Asia News Monitor. (2014, Jun 13). Retrieved from ProQuest: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1535031009/abstract/475D397781A7415FPQ/1?accountid=27656

Tran, H. (2014, Jun 05). 1958 Diplomatic note from Pham Van Dong to Zhou Enlai. Retrieved from Dân Làm Báo: https://danlambaovn.blogspot.com/2017/10/1958-diplomatic-note-from-pham-van-dong.html

Asia News Monitor. (2014, May 23). Retrieved from Proquest: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1527114216/30CEC8981AD54DBFPQ/5?accountid=47774#

Rapheal, T. (2010). Judical Requirements For Arbitration under UNCLOS: Does the South China Sea Decision Bring Long Sought Clarity To The Scope of Historical Claims. International Law and Politics, 49(619), 620.

Linh, B. (2018, Jun 27). [Indo-Pacific Focus] Policy Brief No.4 China's Attitude to the International Legal Order in the Xi Era: The Case of the South China Sea. Retrieved from The Japan Institutute of International Affairs : https://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/article_page.php?id=7

Proelss, A. (2018, Feb). The Limits of Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of UNCLOS Tribunals. Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics, 46, 47-60.

Shannon, T. (2014, Dec 09). Retrieved from The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2014/12/why-china-wont-accept-international-arbitration-in-the-south-china-sea/

Talmon, S. (2022, July 21). The South China Sea Arbitration: Jurisdiction, Admissibility, Procedure. BRILL. Retrieved from ABS-CBN: https://news.abs-cbn.com/focus/07/20/16/how-much-did-ph-pay-for-foreign-lawyers-in-case-vs-china

Winston, R. (2020). Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. Retrieved 2022, from https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365047

Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(03), 427-460.

Nye, J., & Keohane, R. (2011). Power and Interdependence. Pearson.

Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2022, 10 26). Retrieved 10 30, 2022, from https://moit.gov.vn/tin-tuc/hoat-dong/bo-cong-thuong-va-bo-thuong-mai-trung-quoc-to-chuc-ky-hop-lan-thu-nhat-nhom-cong-tac-thuan-loi-hoa-thuong-mai-viet-trung.html

Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2022, Jan 06). Retrieved 10 30, 2022, from Vietnam Briefing: https://moit.gov.vn/tin-tuc/hoat-dong/bo-cong-thuong-va-bo-thuong-mai-trung-quoc-to-chuc-ky-hop-lan-thu-nhat-nhom-cong-tac-thuan-loi-hoa-thuong-mai-viet-trung.html

(2020, 11 27). Report on foreign direct investment in the first 11 months of 2020. Ministry of Planning and Investment of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Retrieved 10 20, 2022, from https://www.mpi.gov.vn/en/Pages/tinbai.aspx?idTin=48523&idcm=289

(2018, Aug 16). Retrieved from US Embassy & Consulate in Vietnam: https://vn.usembassy.gov/fact-sheets-u-s-security-cooperation-with-vietnam/

Panda, A. (2017, Jan 17). Japan Pledges 6 New Patrol Boats for Vietnam Coast Guard. Retrieved from The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/japan-pledges-6-new-patrol-boats-for-vietnam-coast-guard/

Kyodo, J. (2019, Mar 05). Japan and Vietnam defense ministers agree to peacefully tackle Beijing's South China Sea expansion. Retrieved from The Japan Times: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/05/03/national/japan-vietnam-defense-ministers-agree-peacefully-tackle-beijings-south-china-sea-expansion/#.XPPkHdP7TOQ

Nhân Dân . (2013, 06 20). Retrieved 10 19, 2022, from https://en.nhandan.vn/vietnam-china-agree-on-basic-principles-to-resolve-maritime-issues-post17218.html

Giao, B. N. (2022, 08 04). Báo điện tử chính phủ nước Cộng hoà xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam. Retrieved 10 10, 2022, from https://baochinhphu.vn/hoi-nghi-bo-truong-ngoai-giao-asean-voi-cac-doi-tac-102220804145255196.htm

Tran, T. T. (2022, 08 12). [Indo-Pacific Focus] Policy Brief No.5. Retrieved Oct 27, 2022, from The Japan Institute of International Affairs: https://www2.jiia.or.jp/en/article_page.php?id=8

Pearson, J. (2018, May 17). Exclusive: As Rosneft's Vietnam unit drills in disputed area of South China Sea, Beijing issues warning. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-vietnam-southchinasea-exclusv/exclusive-as-rosnefts-vietnam-unit-drills-in-disputed-area-of-south-china-sea-beijing-issues-warning-idUSKCN1II09H

Dasgupta, S. (2014, May 16). Factories set on fire in Vietnam as anti-China sentiment spread [China]. Retrieved from ProQuest: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1524808766/fulltext/94C34F0AD86C45C0PQ/1?accountid=27656

Nguyen, T. D., & Ngo, T. Q. (2014). Impacts of the incident of oil rig 981 on the Vietnamese economy in 2014 and beyond. Ha Noi: Vietnam Center for Economic and Policy Research (VEPR). Retrieved from VEPR: http://vepr.org.vn/upload/533/20141231/HD981%2020140826%20eng55.pdf

Nguyen, P. D. (2013). The problem of statistical data on the number of Chinese people in Vietnam. Retrieved from Vietnam Journals Online: http://www.vjol.info/index.php/ncpt-hue/article/view/10934

Duong, A. (2014, Jun 07). Người Hoa trong lòng đất Việt. Retrieved from Nhan Dan Online: http://www.nhandan.com.vn/chinhtri/item/23442102-nguoi-hoa-trong-long-dat-viet.html

(n.d.). Retrieved Jun 2019, from Permanent Court of Arbitration: https://pca-cpa.org/en/services/arbitration-services/unclos/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v8i5.1464

Copyright (c) 2023 Do Thuy Dung Phan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.