TEACHER’S VIEWS ON THE RELEVANCE OF SECONDARY SCHOOL ENGLISH CURRICULUM: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY, PRACTICE AND THEORY

Carolyn D. Kivihya, Francis C. Indoshi, Samuel O. Oyoo

Abstract


The English curriculum in schools in Kenya is prepared by the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD). This institute mainly relies on input from curriculum experts at the national level, denying classroom teachers the opportunity to express their views in developing a quality education system for its learners. This results in misinterpretations of curriculum intentions consequently impacting on learner achievement in annual English national examinations. The curriculum in use for teaching English in Kenya was last reviewed in 2002. Given the educational changes that have taken place over the years, the curriculum may have become obsolete. The purpose of this study was to assess teachers’ views on the relevance of the English curriculum. The study was guided by three objectives: establish relevance objectives of the English curriculum, determine the relevance of the content of the English curriculum and determine the relevance of suggested resources of the English curriculum. This study was carried out among teachers of English in secondary schools using a descriptive research design. A sample of 180 teachers of English was used. The study used a questionnaire with Likert-type questions as the main instrument for data collection. Qualitative data analysis established that the objectives on reading and listening and speaking skills, content on reading and writing skills, and nine of the suggested resources scored low means when compared to the composite mean. This was an indication that the objectives, content and suggested resources of the English curriculum had discrepancies which ought to be addressed in order to align and make the curriculum relevant to the current needs of learners.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


relevance, objectives, content, resources, curriculum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bogdan, R. C. & Bilklen, S. K . (2007). Qualitative Research for Education. An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Inc.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Cresswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: 2nd Sage.

Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th Ed). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gathumbi, W. A., Bwire, A. M., & Roy-Campbell, Z. M. (2014). Instructional practices and challenges in secondary English language teaching: Implications for the development of benchmarks in Kenya. Journal of Education, 2(11), 1-16.

Goddard, W., & Melville, S. (2004). Qualitative Research Methodology: An Introduction. SA: Juta and Company.

Kenya Institute of Education (KIE). (2002). Secondary Education Syllabus, Vol 1. Nairobi: KIE.

KNEC. (2022). KNEC Report. Nairobi: Kenya National Examinations Council.

Magoma, C. M. (2016). The promise of integrated English curriculum: Teachers’ and Head Teachers’ reactions and reflections. Universal Journal of Educational Research., 4(5), 1148-1157.

Mbithe, C. N. (2014). Influence of the new integrated English curriculum on students’ performance in English at the KCSE in Masinga Division, Kenya. Master of Education Thesis, University of Nairobi.

Melly, R., Okari, M. F., & Oreko, M. A. (2023). Testing Speaking Skills through Writing and Learners' Speaking Competence in Selected Secondary Schools in Wareng' Sub-county Uasin Gishu County Kenya. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 7(3) 421-427.

Ministry of Education. (2018). National Curriculum Policy, Nairobi: Government Printers.

Ocharo, J.K., Okwako, E., & Okoth, T. (2019). Approaches teachers use in teaching imaginative writing; A case of secondary school teachers in Kakamega Central sub-county, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 167-176.

Orwenyo, O.D., & Erastus, K.F. (2022). Challenges of Adopting Open Educational Resources (OER) in Kenyan Secondary Schools: The Case of Open Resources for English Language Teaching (ORELT). Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 5 (2) 148-162.

Osman, A., & Kemboi, J. (2015). Role-play technique as an antecedent of performance in English Language: Evidence from sec schools in Wareng District, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 695), 119-124.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v9i6.1694

Copyright (c) 2024 Carolyn D. Kivihya, Francis C. Indoshi, Samuel O. Oyoo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.