L1 LESSON PLANNING: INVESTIGATING THE EXPERIENCES, PRACTICES, AND PERSPECTIVES OF GREEK TEACHERS
Abstract
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, L. K., & Kendeou, P. (2024). ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 3-10.
Beck, E. E., Solbrekke, T. D., Sutphen, M., & Fremstad, E. (2015). When mere knowledge is not enough: the potential of building as self-determination, co-determination and solidarity. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(3), 445-457.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Vol. 5). Rowman & Littlefield.
Biesta, G. (2013). Receiving the gift of teaching: From ‘learning from’ to ‘being taught by’. Studies in philosophy and education, 32, 449-461.
Biesta, G. (2014). Cultivating humanity or educating the human? Two options for education in the knowledge age. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15, 13-19.
Biesta, G. J. (2015a). Beautiful risk of education. Routledge.
Biesta, G. J. (2015b). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Bladh, G., Stolare, M., & Kristiansson, M. (2018). Curriculum principles, didactic practice and social issues: Thinking through teachers’ knowledge practices in collaborative work. London Review of Education, 16(3), 398-413.
Bolitho, R. (2003). Materials for language awareness. Developing materials for language teaching, 422-425.
Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57-78). Routledge.
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Smith, A. (2018). Pedagogies and literacies, disentangling the historical threads: An interview with Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis. Theory Into Practice, 57(1), 5-11.
Deng, Z. (2015). Content, Joseph Schwab and German Didaktik. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 773-786.
Deng, Z. (2021). Constructing ‘powerful’ curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(2), 179-196.
Deocampo, M. F. (2020). Issues and Challenges of English Language Teacher-Trainees' Teaching Practicum Performance: Looking Back and Going Forward. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2), 486-503.
Forsyth, S. B. (2024). Didactics and Pedagogy in the Digital Age.
Friesen, N. (2018). Continuing the dialogue: curriculum, Didaktik and theories of knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 724-732.
Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and teacher education, 100, 103286.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hopmann, S. (2015). ‘Didaktik meets Curriculum’ revisited: historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(1), 27007.
Hordern, J., & Brooks, C. (2023). The core content framework and the ‘new science’ of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, 1-19.
Hordern, J., Muller, J., & Deng, Z. (2021). Towards powerful educational knowledge? Addressing the challenges facing educational foundations, curriculum theory and Didaktik. In (Vol. 53, pp. 143-152): Taylor & Francis.
Hornberger, N. H., & McKay, S. L. (2010). Sociolinguistics and language education (Vol. 18). Multilingual Matters Bristol.
Inkinen, J., Klager, C., Juuti, K., Schneider, B., Salmela‐Aro, K., Krajcik, J., & Lavonen, J. (2020). High school students' situational engagement associated with scientific practices in designed science learning situations. Science Education, 104(4), 667-692.
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Arvaniti, E., & Christidis, G. E. (2013). New learning: Basic principles for the science of education. Athens, Kritiki.
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Stellakis, N., & Arvaniti, Ε. (2019). Literacies - a differentiated design and multi-modal signifier pedagogy Pub. Kritiki.
Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction (Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13-30.
Klafki, W. (2000). Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. I Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. & Riquarts, K.(red.) Teaching as Reflective Practice. The German Didaktik Tradition. In: London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Krapp, A. (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualisation of interest. International journal for educational and vocational guidance, 7, 5-21.
Krepf, M., & König, J. (2022). Structuring lessons as an aspect of pre-service teachers’ planning competence: A scaling-up analysis. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 25(4), 917-946.
Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European journal of teacher education, 43(4), 608-622.
Matalines, A. M. J. (2023). Teachers' Linguistic Competence, Teaching Skills and Students' Linguistic Competence: Bases for a Training Design. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 40, 41.
McGee, S., & Brazdil, L. C. Essential Supports for Enabling Teachers to Develop Adaptive Lesson Plans that Meet Student Needs.
O'Mara, J., Auld, G., & Wood, N. (2021). Necessary but not sufficient: literacy pedagogies for changing times. Language and Literacy, 23(2), 32-48.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.
Ryen, E. (2020). Klafki’s critical-constructive Didaktik and the epistemology of critical thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(2), 214-229.
Sardo-Brown, D. (1996). A longitudinal study of novice secondary teachers' planning: Year two. Teaching and teacher education, 12(5), 519-530.
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). The Bildung theory—From von Humboldt to Klafki and beyond. Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory, 55-67.
Sommer, W. (2014). The general didactics of Waldorf education and Klafki’s approaches in educational theory–Connections and divisions. RoSE–Research on Steiner Education, 5(1).
Sánchez, G., & Valcárcel, M. V. (1999). Science teachers' views and practices in planning for teaching. In (Vol. 36, pp. 493-513): Wiley Online Library.
Vásquez-Levy, D. (2002). Bildung-centred Didaktik: a framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 117-128.
Westbury, I., Aspfors, J., Fries, A.-V., Hansén, S.-E., Ohlhaver, F., Rosenmund, M., & Sivesind, K. (2016). Organizing curriculum change: An introduction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(6), 729-743.
Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision-making. Journal of teacher education, 42(4), 292-305.
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2021). Classroom management scripts: A theoretical model contrasting expert and novice teachers’ knowledge and awareness of classroom events. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 131-148.
Tokatlidou B. (2004). Communication and linguistic education. Athens. Pataki, 310.
Koutsogiannis, D. (2011). Educational context, school discourse and language teaching Studies on the Greek language. Minutes from the 31st meeting of the Linguistics Department, AUTH.
Koutsogiannis, D. (2017). Language teaching, yesterday, today, tomorrow: A political approach. Institute for Modern Greek Studies, Manolis Triantafyllidi Foundation.
Koutsogiannis, D., & Chatzikyriakou, (2018). From the teaching of grammar to the palimpsest of didactic reality. In Dinas, K. (ed.). Figura in Praesentia: Studies devoted to professor Thanasis Nakas (pages 213-235).
Koutsogiannis, D. (2013). Critical literacies: international experience and Greek reality. In the Minutes of the Panhellenic conference 'Critical Literacy in Classroom Action, 1–3.
Mitsi, A. (2019). The contribution of grammar to the development of the students' communicative ability. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ioannina. School of Education. Department of Early Childhood Education).
Maletskos, A. (2015). Participatory educational techniques for the improvement of methods for teaching Greek language in primary school (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Macedonia. School of Education, Florina. Department of Primary Education).
Manolopoulou, I. (2015). Characteristics of the 2011 curriculum for language in primary education and literacy. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Patras. School of Humanities and Social Sciences. Department of Primary Education).
Pavlidou, M.T, (2017). Language teaching and school discourse in collaborative teaching practices (Doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. School of Philosophy. Department of Philology).
Tsami, B., Fterniati, A., & Arhakis, A. (2016). Mass culture, linguistic variety and humour: Teaching proposals for the development of critical literacy in 5th and 6th grade primary school students. Linguistic variety and critical literacies in the Discourse of mass culture: Educational proposals for the language lesson, 95-123.
Chlapoutaki, E. (2016). Pedagogical practices for critical literacy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Macedonia. School of Education, Florina. Department of Early Childhood Education).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v10i1.1729
Copyright (c) 2024 Georgia Papaspyrou, Anthi Karatrantou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
