REPRESENTATIONS OF PRESCHOOL TEACHERS ON CHILDREN'S GENDER AS A FACTOR IN DIFFERENTIATING THEIR FREE PLAY IN THE SCHOOLYARD

Samartzis Lazaros, Charikleia Pitsou

Abstract


Gendered subjectivities are shaped within social structures, such as education, where gender inequalities intersect with other forms of social disparity. The individuals who operate within these structures play a role in both reproducing and maintaining ine-qualities, as well as in actively challenging them. However, as active agents, they can challenge gender order and inequalities, but their capacity to do so is subject to the constraints imposed by the framework in which they operate. The interaction between teachers and children in the schoolyard is a given, with the schoolyard serving as a space of socialization and interaction, thus becoming a field for the formation and nego-tiation of children's subjectivities. Teachers, through their presence in the schoolyard and their representations of children's gender characteristics, are expected to influence the formation of gendered subjectivities. The representations of preschool teachers re-garding children's gender as a factor in differentiating their free play in the schoolyard were the subject of this qualitative study, conducted through interviews. Twelve kin-dergarten teachers working in public and private schools in the Thessaloniki area par-ticipated. The thematic analysis of the data revealed that while the sample of teachers expressed opposition to gender segregation and inequalities, they adopted a neutral stance toward what occurs in the schoolyard. Moreover, many justified the differences they observed in boys' and girls' play in biological terms, among other reasons.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


representations, gender, free play in the playground, gender disparity, gender segrega-tion, kindergarten teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ӓrlemalm-Hagsér, E. (2010). Gender choreography and micro-structures – early child-hood professionals' understanding of gender roles and gender patterns in out-door play and learning. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(4), 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2010.525951

Bhana, D. (2008). 'Girls hit!' Constructing and negotiating violent African femininities in a working-class primary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Educa-tion 29(3), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300802259160

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C (2014). Reproduction: Elements for a Theory of the Educational System (translated by G. Karabelas). Alexandria. [In Greek]. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/8/82/Bourdieu_Pierre_Passeron_Jean_Claude_Reproduction_in_Education_Society_and_Culture_1990.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryman, A. (2017). Methods of Social Research (translated by P. Sakellariou). Gutenberg. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Social_Research_Methods.html?id=N2zQCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Butler, J. (2009). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. (translated by G. Karabelas). Alexandria. [In Greek].

Cameron, D. (2020). Feminism: Past and Present of a Movement (translated by F. Ditsas). Crete University Press. [In Greek]

Campell, A. (2004). Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts. The Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552210

Chapman, R. (2016). A case study of gendered play in preschools: how early childhood educators' perceptions of gender influence children play. Early Child Development and Care, 186(8), 1271-1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1089435

Clark, S., & Paechter, C. (2007). 'Why can’t girls play football?' Gender dynamics and the playground. Sport Education and Society, 12(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573320701464085

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2008). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Connell, R.W. (2006). Gender (translated by E. Kotsifou). [In Greek] Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Gender.html?id=3CUwJ5MvnaIC&redir_esc=y

Deligianni-Kouimtzi, V. (2008). The gender factor in the Greek educational reality: Summariz-ing the research findings. In V. Deligianni-Kouimtzi, S. Ziogou-Karastergiou, & L. Frosi (Eds.), Gender and educational reality in Greece: Promoting interventions for gen-der equality in the Greek educational system (pp. 273-281). KETHI. [In Greek]

Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD re-searchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126

Dillabough, J-A. (2004). Class, culture and the 'predicaments of masculine domination': encountering Pierre Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236970

Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The hidden life of girls. Games of stance, status and exclusion. Black-well Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Hidden+Life+of+Girls%3A+Games+of+Stance%2C+Status%2C+and+Exclusion-p-9780631234241

Goodwin, M. H. (1985). The serious side of jump rope. Conversational practices and social organization in the frame of play. Journal of American Folklore, 98, 315 330. doi.org/10.2307/539938. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/goodwin/Goodwin_Jumprope.pdf

Goodwin, M. H. (2002). Exclusion in girls' peer groups: ethnographic analysis of lan-guage practices on the playground. Human Development, 45, 392-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000066260

Goodwin, M. H., Goodwin, C., & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2002). Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1621-1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00078-4

Granger, K. L., Hanish, L. D., Kornienko, O., & Bradley, R. H. (2017). Preschool teachers’ facilitation of gender-typed and gender-neutral activities during free play. Sex Roles, 76, 498-510. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11199-016-0675-1

Hjelmér, C. (2020). Free play, free choices? – Influence and construction of gender in preschool in different local contexts. Education Inquiry, 11(2), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1724585

Hyvönen, P. (2008). Teachers' perceptions of boys' and girls' shared activities in the school context: towards a theory of collaborative play. Teachers and teaching. Theory and practice, 14(5-6), 391-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540600802571312

Isari, F., & Pourkos, M. (2015). Qualitative research methodology: Applications in psychology and education. Hellenic Academic Electronic Textbooks and Aids. http://hdl.handle.net/11419/5826. [In Greek]

Karlsson, M., Hjörne, E., & Evaldsson A-C. (2017). Preschool girls as rule breakers: ne-gotiating moral orders of justice and fairness. Childhood, 24(3), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216678292

Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Clémence, A. (2001). Group processes and the construction of social rep-resentations. In: M. A. Hogg, & R. Scott Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, (p. 311-333). Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470998458

Maccoby, E. (1990). Gender and relationships. A developmental account. American Psy-chologist, 45(4), 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.45.4.513

Maccoby, E. (2000). Perspectives on gender development. International Journal of Behav-ioral Development, 24(4), 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500750037946

Mayeza, E. (2017). 'Girls don’t play soccer': children policing gender on the playground in a township primary school in South Africa. Gender and Education, 29(4), 476-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1187262

Mirick, R., & Wladkowski, S. (2019). Skype in qualitative interviews: participant and researcher perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 24, 3061-3072. doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3632. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss12/9/

Pasterski, V., Golombok, S., & Hines, M. (2014). Sex differences in social behavior. Στο: P. K. Smith, & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Willey Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development (2nd ed.), pp 281-298. Wiley Blackwell. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Wiley-Blackwell+Handbook+of+Childhood+Social+Development%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781405196796

Schneider, B. H. (2016). Childhood friendships and peer relations. Friends and enemies (2nd ed). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Childhood-Friendships-and-Peer-Relations-Friends-and-Enemies/Schneider/p/book/9781848723252

Schneider, B. H., Benenson, J., Fülöp, M., Berkicks, M., & Sándor, M. (2014). Cooperation and competition. In: P. K. Smith, & C. H. Hart Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development (2nd ed.), (pp. 472-490). Wiley Blackwell. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Childhood-Friendships-and-Peer-Relations-Friends-and-Enemies/Schneider/p/book/9781848723252

Schneider, B. H., Woodburn, S., Pilar Soteras del Toro, M., & Udvari, S. J. (2005). Cultur-al and gender differences in the implications of competition for early adolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(2), 163–191. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1353/mpq.2005.0013

Seitz, S. (2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577011

Svahn, J., & Evaldsson, A-C. (2011). ‘You could just ignore me’: situating peer exclusion within the contingencies of girls’ everyday interactional practices. Childhood, 18(4), 491-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211402859

Tassi, F., & Schneider, B. H. (1997). Task oriented versus other-referenced competition: differential implications for children’s peer relations. Journal of Applied Social Psy-chology, 27(17), 1557-1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01613.x

Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play. Girls and boys in school. Open University Press. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-97672-000




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v10i4.1824

Copyright (c) 2024 Samartzis Lazaros, Charikleia Pitsou

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.