PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT, PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND PERSONAL COPING IN RELATION TO ATTITUDE TOWARDS PERSON DEPRIVED OF LIBERTY: CONTEXT AMONG MALE INMATES

Brookshields C. Monteron, Gaudencio G. Abellanosa

Abstract


This study determined the best-fit model of attitude towards prisoners among 402 male inmates in Region 10. Specifically, it sought to examine how these psychosocial factors influence inmates’ self-perception and readiness for rehabilitation. A non-experimental, quantitative, descriptive-correlational research design was used. In analyzing the data, the weighted mean, the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the structural equation model were used. Results revealed all variables are rated high and significant correlations among the three predictor variables, perceived social support, psychological well-being, coping mechanisms and inmates’ attitudes toward themselves and fellow prisoners. Particularly, inmates who received strong emotional and instrumental support, displayed higher psychological resilience, and employed adaptive coping strategies were more likely to develop positive attitudes essential for successful reintegration. The study underscores the importance of holistic rehabilitation programs that foster supportive networks, mental wellness, and constructive coping among incarcerated individuals. These findings offer critical implications for prison administrators, mental health professionals, and policymakers in designing interventions that reduce recidivism and promote reintegration through psychosocial empowerment.

 

SDG: #16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) and SDG #3 (Good Health and Well-Being)

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


humanities and social science, perceived social support, psychological well-being, coping mechanisms, attitude toward prisoners, male inmates, correlational research design, Philippines

Full Text:

PDF

References


Althubaiti, A. (2020). Selecting an appropriate sample size for a study. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 27(9), 2669–2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.007

Anggraini, A. D., & Kristianingsih, S. A. (2023). Psychological well-being pada mantan narapidana kasus pengguna narkoba. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202322640

Babbie, E. (2021). The Practice of Social Research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Practice_of_Social_Research.html?id=KrGeygEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond, S. (2017). Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In C. L. Cooper & J. Quick, The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice (pp. 251-364). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118993811

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267

Choi, Y. J., & Ryan, J. P. (2021). Social support, stigma, and emotional strain among formerly incarcerated individuals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(7), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2021.1912916

Clarke, B., Thomas, S., & Rees, D. (2021). Social support and emotional adjustment in prison: The unintended effects of over-involvement. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1776328

Davis, C. P. (2021). Support4Families: A proposed intervention model to support families of individuals returning home from incarceration. Family and Society: The Journal of Contemporary Science, 102(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389420970008

Evans, D., & Wang, J. (2021). Social support and recidivism among released prisoners: Examining the mediating effects of self-esteem and hope. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(9), 1231–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854821993526

Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2020). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus (4th ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/An-Introduction-to-Multilevel-Modeling-Techniques-MLM-and-SEM-Approaches/Heck-Thomas/p/book/9780367182441?srsltid=AfmBOoqrrkFq8LAFWUVgP8cKiw8iWKLrrj1JnMH4_s6plJfMruhoUQVR

Hidayati, N. O., Toharudin, T., & Eriyani, T. (2021). Level of psychological well-being among prisoners. Journal of Nursing Care, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.24198/jnc.v4i3.33196

Hooshang Ghazanfari, M., Miri, S., Taebi, M., & Farokhzadian, J. (2023). Psychological wellbeing, family cohesion, and purposeful life in male prisoners: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 1054149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1054149

Huang, H., Ma, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Stigma and barriers to social reintegration among ex-offenders in East Asian societies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(12), 1307–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20976647

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2021). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 26(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000256

Jalil, M. F., Mohamed, S., & Zakaria, S. A. (2022). Cognitive-behavioral therapy and coping skills training for incarcerated individuals: Effects on psychological well-being and rehabilitation outcomes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(12), 1186–1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X221082305

Jiang, J., Fisher, C., & Jin, J. (2022). The role of family relationships in prisoner reentry: A longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(2-3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211041309

Kaap-Deeder, J. V., Schouten, S., & Soenens, B. (2021). Autonomy and well-being in prison settings: A self-determination theory perspective. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09833-3

Lanciano, T., de Leonardis, L., & Curci, A. (2022). The psychological effects of imprisonment: The role of cognitive, psychopathic and affective traits. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.3995

Macabago, M. A., Rajan, J., Breboneria, B. J. L., Alsharyah, H. M., Mejia, P. C. G., Belal, S., Basher, S., Calaycay, J., Macabago, S. A. L., Estanislao, A. M., Macarambon, R., & Feliciano, E. E. (2020). The socio-demographic profile and coping mechanisms of inmates in Lanao del Sur province, Philippines. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.03.003

MacInnes, D., & Kelly, T. (2022). The effectiveness of peer support interventions for prisoners: A systematic review. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 18(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-07-2021-0063

Maier, K., & Ricciardelli, R. (2021). Prison didn’t change me, I have changed”: Narratives of change, self, and prison time. Sage Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211031336

Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2020). Revisiting desistance and rehabilitation: Insights from ex-offenders. European Journal of Criminology, 17(5), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819887512

Maschi, T., Viola, D., & Morgen, K. (2020). Coping and emotional well-being among older inmates: A life course perspective. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6–7), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1760719

McLennan, S., Meyer, L., Tenzin Wangmo, Gaab, J., Elger, B., & Seaward, H. (2025). Psychological stressors of imprisonment and coping of older incarcerated persons: A qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21452-w

Melvin, K., Gramling, L., & Gardener, W. (1985). A scale to measure attitude towards prisoner. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 241–253.

Muhammad, J., Nasir, M., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Barriers to social reintegration among ex-prisoners in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09364-9

Nachmias, C. F., & Nachmias, D. (2003). Research methods in the social sciences (5th ed.). Arnold Publishing House. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Research_Methods_in_the_Social_Sciences.html?id=5WAiBQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Onwuchekwe, S. I., Ibekwe, C. C., Ezeh, S. S., & Okpala, F. C. (2023). Public perception of ex-convicts reintegration in Idemili-North Local Government Area of Anambra State, Nigeria. Journal of Law and Judicial System, 6(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.22259/2637-5893.0601002

Picken, A. (2022). Coping mechanisms and behavioral outcomes among incarcerated adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 28(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.2021.0012

Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 719–727.

Santi, A., Andi Asrina, & Andi Nurlinda. (2020). Problem focus coping pada narapidana seumur hidup di lembaga pemasyarakatan kelas I Makassar. Journal of Aafiyah Health Research (JAHR), 1(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.52103/jahr.v1i1.102

Sari, N. P., Indrawati, I., & Widodo, W. (2022). The role of religious coping in reducing stress among prisoners. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(2), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-33

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240218229_Research_Methods_for_Business_Students

Sawyer, W., & Wagner, P. (2022). Mass incarceration: The whole pie 2022. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2022.html

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2020). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1733733

Showood, S. (2021, August 9). How atrocious prisons conditions make us all less safe. Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how-atrocious-prisons-conditions-make-us-all-less-safe

Shuker, R., & Newton, D. (2020). Positive psychology and strengths-based approaches in prison rehabilitation. Journal of Forensic Practice, 22(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-12-2019-0054

Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding research: Causal-comparative research designs. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(4), 162–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493

Solbakken, L. E., & Wynn, R. (2022). Barriers and opportunities to accessing social support in the transition from community to prison: A qualitative interview study with incarcerated individuals in Northern Norway. BMC Psychology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00895-5

Stacer, M. (2022). Incarcerated men’s perceptions of the prison environment: An exploratory study. Midwest Social Sciences Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.22543/0796.251.1059

Taherdoost, H. (2022). Sample size determination: A review and practical recommendations. International Journal of Research in Academic Sciences, 4(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6977571

Van Ginneken, E. F., & Hayes, D. (2020). Inmate experiences of psychological growth in restrictive correctional settings. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1686975

Vanhooren, S., Leijssen, M., & Dezutter, J. (2020). Post-traumatic growth in prison: The role of coping, meaning, and social support. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(3), 382–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818779653

Wallace, D., Conner, D., & Johnson, K. (2020). Friendship dynamics among incarcerated populations: The role of peer support in inmate rehabilitation. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1599825

Zeng, S., Xie, X., Liu, Y., & Chen, L. (2021). Family contact and psychological well-being among prisoners in China: The mediating roles of perceived social support and loneliness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661583

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (2010). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 30–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v11i3.2015

Copyright (c) 2025 Brookshields C. Monteron, Gaudencio G. Abellanosa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.

Copyright © 2016 - 2026. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and  Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.