ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF TOURISM RISKS ON TOURISTS' INTENTION TO RETURN TO CAN THO CITY, VIETNAM
Abstract
This study analyzed primary data collected from interviews with 125 domestic tourists to evaluate the impacts of tourism-related risks on tourists’ intention to return (return intention) to Can Tho City, Vietnam. Based on the findings, the study proposed solutions to mitigate and manage these risks. The analysis revealed that tourism activities in Can Tho City were influenced by five groups of risk factors: safety risks, service-related risks, human-related risks, cultural–social risks, and environmental risks. In addition, the study carried practical significance for policy-making in sustainable tourism development in Can Tho. As a result, greater investment and attention from stakeholders involved in tourism were needed to promptly prevent, respond to, and adapt to potential risks. The proposed solutions were expected to contribute positively as a long-term strategy, aiming to build a safe, friendly, and sustainable tourism environment. This, in turn, could strengthen the foundation for local development and enhance the destination’s competitiveness both regionally and internationally.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bang, N. V. (2020). The impact of perceived risk on satisfaction and the intention to revisit Lam Dong among tourists. Asian Economic and Business Research Journal.
Casal-Ribeiro, M., Boavida-Portugal, I., Peres, R., & Seabra, C. (2023). Review of crisis management frameworks in tourism and hospitality: A meta-analysis approach. Sustainability, 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512047
Chi, D. T. P., & Ho, T.-D. S. (2023). Risk management in Vietnamese tourism enterprises. Journal of Advanced Interdisciplinary Research, 3(5), 445–453. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373399794_Risk_Management_in_Vietnamese_tourism_Enterprises
Cunningham, S. M. (1967). The major dimensions of perceived risk. In D. F. Cox (Ed.), Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior (pp. 82–108). Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Risk_Taking_and_Information_Handling_in.html?id=Z-3rAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/209386
Đính, N. V., & Thọ, N. Đ. (2015). Tourism marketing. National Economics University Publishing House.
Fuchs, G., & Reichel, A. (2011). An exploratory inquiry into destination risk perceptions and risk reduction strategies of first-time vs. repeat visitors to a highly volatile destination. Tourism Management, 32(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.01.012
Garg, A. (2015). Travel risks vs tourist decision making: A tourist perspective. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Systems, 8(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.21863/ijhts/2015.8.1.004
George, R. (2017). Tourist risk perceptions and revisit intention. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 6(4).
Karl, M., Muskat, B., & Ritchie, B. W. (2020). Which travel risks are more salient for destination choice? An examination of the tourist's decision-making process. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100487
Kotler, P. (2009). Marketing management (13th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Marketing_Management.html?id=t94QngEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
McTiernan, C., Quinlan, C., Ó Annracháin, C., & Arsoy, A. P. (2025). Tour guides, risk, and trust. In Travel Disruptions: Impacts, Responses, and Resilience. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Travel-Disruptions-Impacts-Responses-and-Resilience/McLoughlin-Melly-Hanrahan/p/book/9781032720531
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4_suppl1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105
Reisinger, Y., & Mavondo, F. (2005). Travel anxiety and intentions to travel internationally: Implications of travel risk perception. Journal of Travel Research, 43(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504272017
Rittichainuwat, B. N., & Chakraborty, G. (2009). Perceived travel risks regarding terrorism and disease: The case of Thailand. Tourism Management, 30(3), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.08.001
Van, N. T. T., Thanh, N. T., & Tuan, T. H. (2024). The impact of perceived risk factors on domestic tourists' revisit intentions in the new normal context in Can Tho City. Journal of Science, University of Dong Thap, 13(9), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.13.9.2024.1367
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v11i3.2017
Copyright (c) 2025 Nguyen Thi Be Ba, Dinh Lan Anh, Le Thi To Quyen, Le Thi My Tien, Nguyen Thi Huynh Phuong, Thai Cong Dan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2026. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.