A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SUCCESSES, FAILURES AND CHALLENGES OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION AS A CONFLICT MANAGEMENT TOOL
Abstract
The need for humanitarian intervention though critical continues to be elusive in many conflict situations despite there being clear international, regional and local guiding policies and legal frameworks on humanitarian intervention. The study therefore sought to critically analyses the successes, failures and challenges of humanitarian intervention as a conflict management tool using the just war theory as the underpinning theory. The study assumed the desktop methodology through extensive review of existing literature on humanitarian intervention as a conflict management tool. The analysis found that humanitarian intervention is justifiable in instances where there are gross human rights violations, however; certain factors must be put into consideration before embarking on the intervention. Successful interventions were found to largely dependent on multiple factors key among them being the involvement of stakeholders in the entire process. The study also revealed that not all interventions are successful and some have resulted in various degrees of failure largely due to challenges of timing, coordination, vested interests among interveners as well as geo-political factors. The paper concludes by recommending that humanitarian interventions should be based on the existing legal frameworks devoid of any strategic motives. Equally, interventions should involve key stakeholders and adopt context specific measures to cater for the different needs of a conflict situation to avert further human rights abuses.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
References
Bajoria, J. & McMahon R. (2013). ‘The Dilemma of Humanitarian Intervention’. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at http://www.cfr.org/humanitarian-intervention/dilemma-humanitarian-intervention/p16524
Barash, D. & Webel, C. (2014). Peace and Conflict Studies (3rd ed.). Los Angele: SAGE
Barnett, M. & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bekoe, D. (2008). Implementing Peace Agreements: Lessons from Mozambique, Angola, and Liberia. Washington: Palgrave
Bellamy, A. & Pape, R. (2013). Reconsidering the Cases of Humanitarian Intervention. International Security, 10/2013, Vol.38 (2), pp.200-202
Bellamy, A. & Williams, P. (2010). Understanding peacekeeping. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity
Duffield, M. (2007). Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of People. Cambridge: Polity.
Greenwood, Christopher (2002) Humanitarian intervention: the case of Kosovo. In: Finnish Yearbook of International Law. Kluwer Law, Helsinki, pp. 141-175.
ICISS. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre
ICtoP. International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect. New York: Institute for Global Policy.
Issues in peace and Conflict Studies: Selection from CQ Researcher. (2011). London: SAGE
James, P. (2010). Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? International Security, 38(2), pp.200-202
Jentleson, B. (2013). American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st Century, (5th ed.) New York: Norton & Company
Kant, I. (1983). Metaphysical Principles of Virtue. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Lee, S. (2010). Humanitarian Intervention -Eight Theories. Diametros 23 pp.23 – 43
MacFarlane, N., Thielking, C. and T. Weiss, T. ‘The Responsibility to Protect: Is Anyone Interested in Humanitarian Intervention?’ Third World Quarterly, xxv, no. 5 (2004), 977 92.
Martini. (2014). Libya after Qaddafi – Lessons and Implications for the Future, Availableat:http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR577/RAND_RR577. pp. 79–85, accessed July 1, 2014.
Matteo, C. (2014). The Libyan Drawers: ‘Stateless Society,’ ‘Humanitarian Intervention,’ ‘Logic of Exception’ and ‘Traversing the Phantasy’. Middle East Critique, 23(4), p.387-404
Murphy, S. (1996). Humanitarian Intervention: The United Nations in an Evolving Order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Nardin, T. (2006). In Nardin and Melissa S. Williams, (eds.) Humanitarian Intervention: Nomos, New York: New York University Press
Nicholas, W. (2000). Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oliver T. (2015). ‘Interventionism by Design or Failure: The Coalition and Humanitarian Intervention’ The Political Quarterly, 86 (1) pp 110–117
Pape, A. (2012). ‘When Duty Calls - A Pragmatic Standard of Humanitarian Intervention’. International Security, 37 (1), pp.41-80
Pavel, C. (2010). ‘Alternative agents for humanitarian intervention’, Journal of Global Ethics 6 (3) DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2010.524803 p323-338
Pingeot, L. and Obenland, W. (2014). In whose name? A critical view on the Responsibility to Protect, Bonn: Global Policy Forum.
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T. & Miall, H. (2012). Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The prevention, management and transformation of deadly conflicts. (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity
Richard, F. (2006). Humanitarian intervention in Kosovo. In J. Mertus & J. Helsing (Eds.), Human Rights and Conflict: Exploring the links between Rights & Peacebuilding. Washington, DC: United states Institute of Peace.
RoK. (2008). National Accord and Reconciliation Act (4)
Straus, S. (2006). The Order of Genocide: Race, Power, and War in Rwanda Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
UN Peacebuilding Commission Report, (2005). http://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/
UN Peacekeeping Report (2004). http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/resources/reports.shtml
UN Report, (2012). www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pbso/pdf/2012PBSO-AnnualReport
UN Secretary-General (2012). Responsibility to protect: timely and decisive response. UN Doc.
United Nations Peace building Commission report, 2010.
Wheeler, N. (2000). Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.249
Copyright (c) 2018 Joyce Karungari Muchemi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
