THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DROUGHT MITIGATION STRATEGIES IN CHEGUTU DISTRICT, MASHONALAND WEST PROVINCE, ZIMBABWE
Abstract
Drought induced famine has been the worst disaster from which most rural people experience immense anguish. It still remains a National Policy Agenda and a problem in most developing countries like Zimbabwe. Due to climate change, the impacts of droughts are expected to deepen where the capacity to adapt is low. Though it remains a challenge in communities, local people have devised different coping mechanisms based on the resources that are locally available but the effectiveness of these are questionable. Therefore, using both qualitative and quantitative methods this work aims at identifying the drought mitigation strategies used in ward 12 of Chegutu district. People are using drought mitigation strategies which include food aid, food for work, and sale of livestock, remittances and irrigation schemes where provision of food aid and food for work while the least effective were remittances and irrigation. The study also revealed that 72% of the community was not familiar with the effectiveness of all the drought mitigation strategies used. The strategies are held back by challenges in the ward which induce poor service delivery by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and government departments in mitigating droughts, poverty, corruption, lack of resources and unclear selection criteria of beneficiaries as well as lack of markets thereby leading to inefficiency of the drought mitigation strategies. The study recommended the construction of more dams and necessary infrastructure for irrigation, adoption of local knowledge into mitigation strategies, improving access to agricultural inputs and enhanced provision of technical assistance to farmers in the area.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agricultural Technical & Extension. (2008). Quarterly report, Unpublished, Harare
Andear, C. (2009). Zimbabwe- Coping with drought and climate change. [Electronic]. Available: http://www.adaptationlearning.net [2011, March 13].
Ajay and Beldev Sahai (1986) Socio-economic impacts of natural disasters: a gender analysis. Sustainable development and Human settlements division, Santiago, [Electronic]. Available: http://www.eclac.org [2011, February 21].
Buckland, R., Eele, G and Mugwara, R (2000). Humanitarian crisis and natural disasters. A SADC perspective. Food and Humanitarian security. Frank cass Production. London.
Blackburn, H.D., Glimp, H., Phillip, D., Child, D. & Pope, A. (1993). Utilization and preservation of livestock resources. Washington, DC. US Agency for International Development (USAID), Bureau for Food and Humanitarian Assistance, Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)
Burns, C. and Groove, P. (2003). The Practitioners’ Guide to Household Economy Approach. [Electronic]. Available: www.feg-consulting.com. [2010, April 14].
Campbell, D.J., Zinyama, L.M. & Matiza, T. (1991). ‘Coping with food deficits in rural Zimbabwe: The sequential adoption of indigenous strategies’. Research in Rural Sociology and Development 5:73-85.
Census (2012). Zimbabwe’s population and demographic statistics, Statistical Offices Harare,
Chazovachii, B., Chigwenyu, A., and Mushuku, A(2010). ‘Adaptation of climate resilient rural livelihoods through growing of small grains in Munyaradzi communal area. Gutu District’. African journal of Agricultural research, 8. 1335- 1345.
Decon, S., Haddinolt, J and Woldehanna. T (2005). Shocks and consumption in Ethiopia. Journal of African Economies. 14(4), 559-585.
Devappa and Khagesten (2011) Industrial utilization of sorghum and millet in Zambia: An approach to food security In Food security ypolicies in the SADCC region, eds. M. Rukuni, Mudimu, G. & Jayne, T.S. 191-203. Harare, Zimbabwe: University of Zimbabwe, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Zimbabwe/Michigan State University Food Security Research in Southern Africa Project
Dracup, Bang, S.K. & Sitango, K. (1980). Indigenous Drought Coping Strategies and Risk Management against EL Nino in Papua New Guinea: CGPRT centre Working Paper No. 74. [Electronic]. Available: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/32687/1/wp [2011, March 13].
Eldridge, C. (2002). Why was there no famine following the 1992 southern African drought? IDS Bulletin 33, 4: 79-87
FAO (2008). Zimbabwe 2008/07 Agricultural season update
Hokonan and Boudreau (2008) Early warning and vulnerability assessment for famine mitigation. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona, Office of Arid Lands Studies. Prepared for the USAID/OFD A through the USDA/OICD, Washington, D.C.
Kaseke, E. (1996). Social security systems in Rural Zimbabwe Weaver Press. Harare.
Kepas, T.T.G (1999). Household food security in Tanzania: Preliminary findings from four regions: In Market reforms, research policies, and SADCC food security, Zimbabwe: University of Zimbabwe, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Harare
Krisha, B. (2013). Coping with drought: Research findings from Bulilima and Mangwe Districts, Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe. Practical action. [Electronic]. Available: http://www.preventionweb.net/ [2011, March 13].
Madzvamuse (2010). Famine mitigation in Zimbabwe: Same practices. Impact lessons Journal of the middle state geographer 28, 37-44.
Maphosa, B. (1994). Lessons from the 1992 drought in Zimbabwe. The quest for alternative food policies Nordic Journal of African Studies.
Morris, B., B. (2004). Climate growth in Africa: adaptation strategies and institutions. A synthesis report prepared for the Heinrich Boll Foundation,.
Moyo, B. (1999).The impact of growth in the tourism sector on economic development: the experience of selected Caribbean countries, Economia Internazionale, 48, 375- 85.
Mnet, U. (2010) Mobilizing for nature in southern African community-based conservation policies, or the death of the local. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 2585–2600.
Ministry of Agriculture (2013). Second round crop and livestock assessment Report.
Munro, L.T. (2006). Zimbabwe’s drought relief programme in the 1990s. A re- assessment using the national household survey data. Journal of contingencies and crisis management 14, 3:125-141.
Murerwa, Z.P. (2010). FEWS Current Vulnerability Assessment Guidance Manual. Introduction to Current Vulnerability Guidelines. [Electronic]. Available: http://www.the-ecentre.net [2011]
Mugotsi, K., Nyangito, M.M. and Nyariki D.M. (2012).The role of drought among Agro – Pastoral communities in Semi-arid Environments: The case of Botswana, The journal of arid environments. 91, 38-44.
Mushore, T.D. (2013). Climatic changes, erratic rains and necessity of construction water infrastructure. Post 2000 land reform in Zimbabwe. International journal of scientific and technology Research 2(8).
Narajan (2003). Communal Area Livestock Management Systems in Zimbabwe. In FAO Corporate Document Repository; Agriculture and Consumer Protection. [Electronic]. Available: http://www.fao.org/ [2011, April 01].
Ncube S., P. (2010). Reservoir operation under different climate scenarios. Case of Roswa Dam. Bikita district. University of Zimbabwe. Harare.
Rulinda, W., Rersfg, G. and Delphi, F. (2010). Reducing the Risk of disasters- Helping to Achieve Sustainable Poverty Reduction in a Vulnerable World: (Unpublished paper). A DFID policy paper.
Palmer, A. (1968). Drought preparedness planning: building institutional capacity. International journal of Environmental science. Vol 4: 67- 101
Seiler (1998) Planning for drought: Moving from crisis to risk management. Journal of the American water Resources association 36: 697-710.
World development report (2010). Vulnerability preparedness and mitigation. Natural and Anthropogenic Disasters, Springer. New Delphi.
ZimVAC. (2009). Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZimVAC) Interim Rural Food Security Assessment. Co-ordinated by the Scientific Industrial Research and Development (SIRDIC) & Food and Nutrition Council (FNC), Zimbabwe. Chapter 10:06. (1996). Civil Protection Act. (Act 5/1989). Chapter 10:06. Revised Edition, Zimbabwe: Government printer, Harare.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.498
Copyright (c) 2019 Roy Makova, Jemitias Mapira, Leonard Shambira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
