PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON INTEGRATIVE COMPLEXITY
Abstract
Integrative complexity (IC) refers to a psychological construct, a measurement, and an experience. As a construct IC refers to our less than conscious thinking style in the face of difference or disagreement, how we process information, make decisions, solve problems. The cross-culturally validated empirical measurement frame of IC has predictive values. ’Low IC’ indicates a simple thinking style that is rigid and closed, a ’tunnel vision’ way of thinking that cannot respect or recognize different dimensions or perspectives on a topic, predicting destructive conflict or violence. An increasingly complex thinking style is able to ’see the big picture’, to differentiate and then integrate different dimensions and perspective on topics, linking them in some way, predicting more peaceful outcomes to conflict. As an experience, IC refers to less or more awareness of thoughts, emotion, and physical states in self and others related to IC management. The IC Thinking Research Group (University of Cambridge) pioneered the ’operationalization’ of the IC measure into an educational method, program and professional practices. The coding system i.e. empirical measurement frame, has been developed further to take elaborative aspects into account. The two components of complex thinking, differentiation and integration can each be broken down in two sub-components, elaborative and dialectical. In order to clarify the pros and cons of integrative complexity theory and its further developments in IC Thinking, it is useful to investigate its philosophical background. The theory and its applications are essentially dealing with language and the skill to use words or concepts. However it should be noted that besides the skills an essential part of the theory and its applications deals with our unconscious processes that are not explicitly controllable. An alternative for a philosophy of language behind the theory of integrative complexity is to consider an application of the use theory of meaning to explain its central components. Minimalist theory of fiction (MTF) was developed to explain the philosophical problems of fiction, but can also be applied to integrative complexity. Using words in different situations requires an ability to read contextual cues in order to follow the correct rules for the uses of words in particular contexts[1]. From these philosophical grounds, the theory of integrative complexity (IC) appears as a totality of the language games people are playing. One may be limited to one game, which means separating oneself from others, considering this game to be ultimately defining the correct uses of words. When one recognizes alternative games going on, it means reaching higher levels of IC. What is crucial is that this does not require a person to reject their core beliefs, since they may still be true. This approach challenges IC theory to improve its coding system but also offers possibilities for further developments and applications.
[1] This ability, ’sensitivity to context’, is a key part of the IC management capacity.
Article visualizations:
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayer, A. J. 1936. Language, Truth and Logic. London: Victor Gollancz. 1936. Published in Pelican Books.
Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E. J., Bluck, S., de Vries, B., Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 401-418). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a `theory of mind'? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
Boyd-MacMillan, E., Campbell, C., & Furey, A. (2016). An IC Intervention for Post-Conflict Northern Ireland Secondary Schools. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(4), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.9.4.1558
Boyd-MacMillan, Eolene M.; Andrews Fearon, Patricia; Ptolomey, Amanda M.; and Mathieson, Laura J.. "I SEE! Scotland: Tackling Sectarianism and Promoting Community Psychosocial Health." Journal of Strategic Security 9, no. 4 (2016): : 53-78. Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol9/iss4/5
Conway, L. G. III, Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Integrative complexity and political decisions that lead to war or peace. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. N. Winter (Eds.), Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 66-75). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Conway, L. G. III, Thoemmes, F., Allison, A. M., Towgood, K. H., Wagner, M. J., Davey, K., . . . Conway, K. R. (2008). Two ways to be complex and why they matter: Implications for attitude strength and lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1029-1044.
Currie, G. (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frege, G. 1956. The Thought: A logical Inquiry. Reprinted in Blackburn, S & Simmons, K (eds.) 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. 1892 ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25-50. Translated as ‘On Sense and Reference’ by M. Black in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, P. Geach and M. Black (eds. and trans.), Oxford: Blackwell, third edition, 1980.
Horwich, P. 1998a. Truth. Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Horwich, P. 1998b. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Houck, S. C., Repke, M. A., & Conway, L. G. (2017). Understanding what makes terrorist groups’ propaganda effective: an integrative complexity analysis of ISIL and Al Qaeda. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(2), 105-118.
Kalogirou- V. & Economopoulou, V.(2012) Building bridges between texts: From Intertextuality to intertextual reading and learning. Theoretical challenges and classroom resources. Exedra Journal, The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication - TOJDAC April 2015 Volume 5 Issue 2Copyright © The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication 17 Retrieved
Kristeva, J. 1993. Puhuva subjekti. Tekstejä 1967-1993. Tampere: Gaudeamus
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretence and representation: the origins of "theory of mind". Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.
Lillard, A. S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development, 64, 348–371.
Nyberg, C. 2015. Fiction in Drama Education Offers Learning Opportunities for All, Philosophical Perspectives in Drama Education. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences. EJSBS Volume XII (eISSN: 2301-2218)
Nyberg, C. (2016) Fiction, Truth and Reference. Minimalist Theory of Fiction. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed), From Philosophy of Fiction to Cognitive Poetics. Studies in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics, Volume 4. Peter Lang Edition.
Nyberg, C. (2018) Truth in Fiction Reconsidered. In S. H. Klausen (Ed), Res Cogitans. Vol 13, No 1. Frontiers in the philosophy of literature.
Ramsey, F.P. 1931. On Facts and Propositions. In Blackburn, S & Simmons, K (eds.) 1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Randell, A & Nielsen, M. (2007). Children's Communication of Pretend Acts Using Social Cues, In M. A. Vanchevsky (Ed), Frontiers in Cognitive Psychology, Nova Science Publishers
Russell, B., (1905), ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14 (October): 479-493
Suedfeld, P. (1986). Authoritarian thinking, groupthink, and decision-making under stress: Are simple decisions always worse? American Psychological Association symposium presentation; (1988) Society, 25(5), 25-27.
Suedfeld, P., & Coren, S. (1992). Cognitive correlates of conceptual complexity. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(11), 1193-1199.
Suedfeld, P., & Rank, A. D. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 169178.
Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 169-184.
Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Ramirez, C. (1977). War, peace, and integrative complexity. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 427-442.
Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. (pp. 393-400). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tarski, A. 1944. The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Reprinted in Blackburn, S. & Simmons, K. (eds.) 1999. Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge, Harvard University Press
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L. 1999. Filosofisia tutkimuksia. Transl. Heikki Nyman. Porvoo: WSOY. (originally Philosophische Untersuchungen 1953)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v0i0.558
Copyright (c) 2019 Crister Nyberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The research works published in this journal are free to be accessed. They can be shared (copied and redistributed in any medium or format) and\or adapted (remixed, transformed, and built upon the material for any purpose, commercially and\or not commercially) under the following terms: attribution (appropriate credit must be given indicating original authors, research work name and publication name mentioning if changes were made) and without adding additional restrictions (without restricting others from doing anything the actual license permits). Authors retain the full copyright of their published research works and cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the license terms are followed.
Copyright © 2016 - 2023. European Journal Of Social Sciences Studies (ISSN 2501-8590) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library. All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms. All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and standards formulated by Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002), the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003) and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyrights of the published research works are retained by authors.
