El Hassan Rouijel, Abdelmajid Bouziane, Abdelaziz Zohri


This study investigates whether the explicit instruction of critical thinking skills can impact students’ ability to use higher-order thinking skills in reading comprehension. It particularly focuses on the instruction of critical thinking in its evaluative dimension and measures the impact on the development of three thinking skills, namely understanding, analyzing and evaluating. The EFL preparatory class students in the experimental group (n=27) were trained in using two of these skills for reading comprehension whereas those in the control group (n=29) took their normal classes. The results show that the experimental group significantly improved between the pre- and post-tests and outperformed their control counterparts. These results confirm the hypothesis claiming that high-order thinking skills are teachable. However, the results report that higher-order thinking skills develop independently of lower-order ones.


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



reading comprehension, critical thinking, higher-order thinking

Full Text:



Acosta, L. M., & Ferri, M. M. (2010). Reading Strategies to Develop Higher Thinking Skills for Reading Comprehension. Profiel, 12(1), 107-123. Retrieved March 23, 2017, from

Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: a theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation, 24, 35-41.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., . . . Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Bartu, H. (2001). Can't I Read without Thinking? Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(2), 593-614.

Beck, I. L. (1989). Reading and Reasoning. The Reading Teacher, 42(9), 676-682. Retrieved April 15, 2016, from

Beyer, B. K. (1985). Critical Thinking: What Is It? Social Education, 49(4), 270-276.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Cuban, L. (1984). Policy and research dilemmas in the teaching of reasoning: Unplanned designs. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 655-681. Retrieved February 20, 2016, from

Ennis, R. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron, & R. J. Sternberg, Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice (pp. 9-26). New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.

Ezzaki, A. (1986). Questioning in Language Education. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference of MATE, (pp. 10-18).

Fand, R. J. (1989). Detecting bias in Newspapers: Implications for Teaching ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 6(1), 315-322.

Halpern, D. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Iwai, Y. (2016). The effect of explicit instruction on strategic reading in a literacy methods course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(1), 110-118.

Koda, K. (2007). Reading language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(1), 1-44. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1

Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2006). Metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension in elementary-school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXI(4), 439-451. Retrieved April 10, 2017, from

Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Dept. RC, Washington, DC 20036-1183.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson Research Report. Retrieved from

Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 131-137. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from

Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further Notes on the Four Resources Model. Retrieved from Reading Online:

Nold, H. (2017). Using critical thinkingteaching methods to increase student success: An action research project. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 17-32.

Pang, J. (2008). Research on good and poor reader characteristics: Implications for L2 reading research in China. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1), 1-18.

Reddin, E. (1968). Listening instruction reading, and critical thinking. The Reading Teacher, 21(7), 654-658.

Remark, A., & Ewing, E. M. (2015). Use of high-level questioning to increase student achievement in reading. Masters of Arts in Education Action Research Papers. Paper 127. Retrieved April 6, 2017, from

Renaissance Learning. (2011). AR, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Thinking. Educational Research Department. Wisconsin: Renaissance Learning, Inc.

Resnick, L. B., & Klopfer, L. E. (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: An overview. In L. B. Resnick, & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward thethinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 1-18). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Yousefi, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2016, July). Critical thinking and reading comprehension among postgraduate students: The case of gender and language proficiency level. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 802-807. Retrieved April 1, 2017, from

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: are they mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181. Retrieved February 3, 2017, from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).