THE SIOP MODEL AS AN EMPOWERING TEACHING METHOD FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS - A STUDY CASE

Mustapha Boughoulid

Abstract


The increase in the needs of the English language learners (ELLs) and their endless demands in terms of achievement and proficiency in all the educational systems all over the world urged teachers and educators to call for new teaching strategies that sound more adequate and appropriate in the classroom. The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Model emerged as one of the worldwide prominent teaching methods that guarantee the ELLs success, especially when it has to do with the understanding of the content and language learning meanwhile. With its diverse culture and prominent engagement in terms of education, Morocco represents a fertile field for the implementation of the SIOP Model that has proven in different contexts its adequacy in helping ELLs achieve proficiency. This study is about a quasi-experimental research that is implemented in an urban school known for its diversification in terms of mother tongue, socio-economic status, gender, and background. Given these different circumstances of the learners, the findings reported after the adoption of the SIOP Model as a teaching approach showed that it is a reliable and adequate teaching method in terms of content and language proficiency. The use of wh-questions as key indicators to measure the learners’ capacity of understanding and responding correctly throughout the experiment phase showed the superiority of the ELLs in the SIOP classes in contrast to the learners in the mainstream classes. This superiority is embodied, especially in terms of the high scores obtained in providing correct answers in a short duration of time.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Model, English language learners (ELLs), English language proficiency (ELP), mainstream class, SIOP class

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloom, L., Merkin, S., & Wootten, J. (1982). Wh-questions: Linguistic factors that contribute to the sequence of acquisition. Child Development, 53, 1084-1092. Reprinted in Bloom, L., (1992). Language development from two to three. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242-256.

Collier, V. P. (1995). Acquiring a second language for school: Directions in language and education. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Vol. 1, No. 4, Fall 1995. Retrieved from http://cmmr.usc.edu/501HakutaCollierReadings/CollierThomas_Acquiring_L2_for_School.pdf.

Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121-129.

Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (2003). Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English Language Learners with Diverse Abilities. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Pearson Publishers.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2004). Making content comprehensible for English learners : The SIOP model (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

Echevarria, J., & Vogt, M. E. (2008). 99 Ideas and Activities for Teaching English Learners with the SIOP Model. Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

Echevarria, J., Short, D., and Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4): 195-210. Retrieved from http://edfs200ell.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/54561001/EchevarriaShort-SchRefSBEELLs.pdf.

Echevarria, J., & Colburn, A. (2006). Designing lessons: Inquiry approach to science using the SIOP Model. In A. Lathman & D. Crowther, (Eds.), Science for English language learners (pp. 95–108). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2007). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon. Retrieved from http://www.schtools.com/membersnew/documents/MSSAA/14-15LLP-SEI_SIOP.pdf.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Echevarria, J., & Short, D. J. (2010). Programs and practices for effective sheltered content instruction. ResearchGate.

Echevarria, J., & Vogt, M. E. (2010). Using the SIOP model to improve literacy for English learners. The NERA Journal, 46(1), 8-15. Retrieved from http://msmiddletonsclassroom.weebly.com/uploads/5/4/3/6/54366123/siop_model_for_ells.pdf.

García, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 371–392.

Hakuta, K., Butler, G. Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency ? University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Policy Report 2000-1. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucmerced.edu/khakuta/research/publications/(2000)%20-%20HOW%20LONG%20DOES%20IT%20TAKE%20ENGLISH%20LEARNERS%20TO%20ATTAIN%20PR.pdf.

Howard, E. R., Sugarma, J., & Coburn, C. (2006). Adapting the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) for Two-Way Immersion Education: An introduction to the TWIOP. Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/twi/TWIOP.pdf.

Nichols, S. L. (2012). Examining the effect of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol model on the reading comprehension of first grade students. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3929&context=etd.

Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V., and Theakston, A. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14513470.

Saunders, W., Goldenberg, C., & Marcelletti, D. (2013). English language development: Guidelines for instruction. American Educator, 37(2), 13-25. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Saunders_Goldenberg_Marcelletti.pdf.

Short, D. J., & Echevarria, J. (1999). The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol : A tool for teacher-researcher collaboration and professional development. Santa Cruz, CA : Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/siop/pdfs/digests/sheltered-instruction-observation-protocol.pdf.

Short, D. J., Echevarria, J., & Richards-Tutor, C. (2011). Research on academic literacy development in sheltered instruction classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 15(3) 363–380. Doi : 10.1177/1362168811401155.

Short, D., J., Fidelman, C., G., & Louguit, M. (2012). Developing academic language in English language learners through Sheltered Instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2) : 234-361. Doi : 10.1002/tesq.20.

USQ (2016). What is English proficiency? Retrieved from https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/161460PL.

Withycombe, A. C. (2014). An exploration of the role of English language proficiency in academic achievement. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Educational Methodology, Policy, and Leadership and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon). Retrieved from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/18726/Withycombe_oregon_0171A_11164.pdf;sequence=1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i2.3451

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).