THE IRF EXCHANGE AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL: A STUDY OF ESL CLASSROOMS IN POKUASE TOWNSHIP, GHANA

Charlotte Fofo Lomotey, Gifty Emma Gyima-Aboagye

Abstract


The classroom is a place where teachers and their pupils or students engage in interaction in order to promote effective learning. Such interactions can follow different patterns, and one such pattern is the IRF (initiation-response-feedback) exchange structure, developed by Sinclair and Coulthard (1975, 1992). This study examines the use of the IRF exchange pattern as a pedagogical tool in the English language classrooms of some Basic Schools in Pokuase, a town in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. It investigates the way teachers and pupils initiate, respond to, and provide feedback for effective language acquisition. In order to achieve this objective, a qualitative case study was adopted to analyze 11 hours and 40 minutes of classroom recordings and 100 minutes of interview data. Results regarding the IRF structure show that the various acts within the initiation move included nomination, directing, and prompting; the acts in the response move were replying and reacting, while the acts within the feedback move were acceptance, praise, criticism, and expansion. This result is an indication that there were more initiation and feedback acts than response acts, suggesting the teachers dominated the use of the exchange pattern, leaving the pupils to only provide responses. Results of the teachers’ role indicate that they are engaging in teacher talk as a way of providing explanation, organizing the lesson, and redirecting learners in the interaction. The teachers also provided prompt guidelines by creating conducive environment for the learners to be able to write, read, also provided specific and individual feedback to either correct learners’ language input or to encourage them to learn more. Based on the results, it is argued that teachers, especially at the basic level, should endeavour to employ the use of the IRF pattern because it has the potential to contribute a great deal to ESL teaching and learning.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


IRF exchange, pedagogical tool, ESL classrooms, classroom interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biggs, J. (2011). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. The Higher Education Academy. New York: United Kingdom.

Blanchette, J. (2009). Characteristics of teacher talk and learner talk in the online learning environment. Language and Education, 23(5), 391-407.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principle an interactive approach to language pedagogy. (2nd Ed.), White Plans: Pearson.

Bye, R. T. (2017). The Teacher as a Facilitator for Learning - Flipped Classroom in a Master‘s Course on Artificial Intelligence. Ålesund, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Cockayne, M. (2010). Applying the Sinclair and Coulthard model of discourse analysis to a student-discourse analysis to a student-centred EFL classroom. MA TEFL/TESL ODL. Module 4.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dagarin, M. (2004). Classroom interaction and communication strategies in learning English as a foreign language. ELOPE, 1, 127-139.

Dailey, A. U. (2010). An analysis of classroom discourse: The Usefulness of Sinclair and Coulthard’s Rank Scale in a Language Classroom. University of Birmingham.

Elkhouzai, E. (2016). The use of feedback in classroom interaction in Moroccan Primary School. European Scientific Journal, 12(4), 281- 301.

Ellis, R. (2004). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.

Fraenkel, R. & Wallen, N. (1996) (3rd edn.). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.

Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom. Students, teachers and researchers. London: Continuum.

Goronga, P. (2013). The nature and quality of classroom verbal interaction: Implications for primary school teachers in Zimbabwe. Academic Research International, 4(2), 431-444.

Hall, J. K. & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186-203.

Hardman, J. (2016). Opening-up classroom discourse to promote and enhance active, collaborative and cognitively-engaging student learning experiences. In Goria, C., Speicher, O. & Stollhans, S. (Eds.), Innovative language teaching and learning at university: Enhancing participation and collaboration (pp. 5-16). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.

Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32(1), 79-104.

Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of adsorption technology in environmental science. Journal of Environmental Protection Science; 1(1): 42746.

Jones, S. (2009). Application of the Sinclair and Coulthard discourse model to a Korean university English conversation course. MA TESOL / TEFL Module 4.

Križan, A. (2008). Classroom discourse: The applicability of Sinclair and Coulthard’s IRF model. Maribor: Filozofska fakulteta Univerze.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. The Physics Front, 276.

Li, J. (2018). L1 in the IRF cycle: A case study of Chinese EFL classrooms. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1-15.

Macedo, A. R. (2000). Classroom and spoken discourse and phonology. University of Birmingham, England.

Malouf, R. (1995). Towards an analysis of multi-party discourse. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.8.4024 [Accessed 02 May 2020].

McCarthy, M. (2002). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Noviana, A. & Ardi, P. (2015). Challenges in implementing initiation-response-feedback (IRF) sequences in EAP Class. Journal of Education and Technology, 1(3), 76-91.

Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Prentice hall.

Nyarko, I. O. (2020). Overlaps and interruptions in the English language classroom: A study of three private schools in the Kasoa Township. (MPhil. Thesis). University of Education, Winneba.

Quomi, M. A. (2004). EFL Classroom discourse analysis: Focus on teacher talk. Nour: Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University.

Raine, P. (2010). An application of the Sinclair and Coulthard (1975) method of discourse analysis. Ms. University of Birmingham.

Ramadhan, M. A. (2013). The use of Initiation-response-feedback in content language integrated learning classroom interaction. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Ramirez-Verdugo, M. & Castellano, L. L. (2021). Classroom interaction in language teacher education: Analysis of learners’ reactions to questions and feedback. In Ramirez-Verdugo, M. & Otcu-Grillman, B. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches toward enhancing teacher education (pp. 178-201). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Rustandi, A. & Mubarok, A. H. (2017). Analysis of IRF (initiation-response feedback) on classroom interaction in EFL speaking class. Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 2(1), 239-250.

Sadker, M. P. & Sadker, D. M. (1991). Teachers, school and society, (2nd Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Sert, O. (2019). Classroom interaction and language teacher education. In Mann, S. & Walsh,

S. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 216-238). Milton Park, London: Routledge.

Simona, P. D. (2002). Mediation revisited: The interactive organization of mediation in learning environments. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(1), 22-42.

Sinclair, J. M. & Brazil, D. C. (1982). Teacher talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1992). Toward an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), (1992). Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 1-34). Milton Park, London: Routledge.

Snikdha, F. R. (2016). Analyzing classroom discourse: An exploratory study on IRF at a private university of Dhaka. Dhaka: BRAC University.

Sunderland, J. (2001). Student initiation, teacher response, student follow-up: Towards an appreciation of student-initiated IRFs in the language classroom. Language Education Working Paper 54, Lancaster University.

Tagoe, S. A. (2019). Code-switching in the English language classroom: An investigation of Junior High Schools in the Asikuma-Odoben-Brakwa District. (MPhil. Thesis). University of Education, Winneba.

Taous, B. (2013). The role of classroom interaction in improving the students’ speaking skill. (Dissertation). Biskra University

Thoms, J. J. (2012). Classroom discourse in foreign language classrooms: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 45(S1), 8-27.

Tout, D. (2016). The teacher as a facilitator and resource person. Teacher.

Tuan, L. T. & Nhu, N. T. K. (2010). Theoretical review on oral interaction in EFL classrooms. Studies in Literature and Language.

van Compernolle, R. A. (2015). Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-Royal, 6, 1-14.

Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Wood, D. (1992). Teaching talk. In K. N. (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 203-214). London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Yevudey, E. (2013). The pedagogic relevance of codeswitching in the classroom: Insights from Ewe-English codeswitching in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(2), 1-22.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i5.3889

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).