USING SEMANTIC MAPS AS A TEACHING STRATEGY FOR VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT

Muthyala Udaya

Abstract


Semantic maps ensure a high potential to facilitate enhanced quality of understanding words. English as second language learners are often presented with new English vocabulary items that are often pre-organized in sets of semantically related words. However, there is an assumption that word grouping facilitates activities for vocabulary learning and no empirical justification supports employing this teaching technique. This study aims to examine to what extent semantic relatedness influences ESL vocabulary recall and retention for middle school students of Telangana. The current study was conducted with 30 seventh-grade students over six weeks. Learners were divided into two groups to compare the effects of presenting semantic maps (retention, recall) and wordlists (recognition, cued recall) for reading comprehension activities. The results reveal that both teaching strategies positively affect vocabulary recall and retention. Between these two strategies, semantic mapping yields better results on recall. The difference between the groups explains from the perspective of information process theory and memory model. Lastly, significant learning and the effectiveness of semantic maps were found in the experiment group.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


semantics maps, recall, retention, syntactic, wordlists, vocabulary learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amer, Aly Anwar (2002). Advanced vocabulary instruction in EFL. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(11). Retrieved August 18, 2020, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Amer-Vocabulary/

Atkinson, Richard & Shiffrin, Richard (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes, in K.W. Spence and J.T. Spence (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press.

Bear, Donald. R., Invernizzi, Marcia, Templeton, Shane & Johnston, Francine R. (2011). Words Their Way: Word Study for Phonics, Vocabulary, and Spelling Instruction. Pearson.

Bolger, Patrick, & Zapata, Gabriel (2011). Semantic categories and context in L2 vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 6J(2), 614-646.

Brown, H. Douglas (2004). Language assessment principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.

Chin, Cheongsook S. (2002). Context, semantic mapping, and word lists: Effectiveness on EFL learners' vocabulary growth. English Teaching, 57(4), 245-266.

Collins, Allan M. and Elizabeth F. Loftus (1975). A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing, Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.

Duffy, Gerald G. (2009). Explaining Reading: A Resource for Teaching Concepts, Skills, and Strategies. Second Edition. London: The Guildford Press.

Folse, Keith S. (2004). Vocabulary Myths: Applying Second Language Research to Classroom Teaching. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Gairns, Ruth, and Stuart Redman (1986). Working with Words: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. London: Cambridge University Press).

Gillund, Gary & Shiffrin, Richard M. (1984). A Retrieval model for both Recognition and Recall. Psychological Review, 91(1), 1–67.

Hashemi, Mohmmad R., & Gowdasiaei, Farah (2005). An Attribute-treatment Interaction Study: Lexical-Set versus Semantically-unrelated Vocabulary Instruction. RELC Journal, 36(3), 341-361.

Heimlich, Joan E. and Pittelman, S. V. (1986). Semantic Mapping. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.

Hulstijn, Jan H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction (Ed.) Peter Robison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, Dale D., Pittleman, Susan D. & Heimlich, Joan E. (1986). Semantic Mapping. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 778-782.

Johnson, Dale D. & Pearson, P., David (1978). Teaching Reading Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jullian, Paula (2000). Creating word-meaning Awareness. ELT Journal, 54(1),37-46.

Khoii, Roya and Sharififar, Samira (2013). Memorization versus Semantic Mapping in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. ELT Journal, 67 (2), 199-209.

Laufer, Batia & Shmueli, Karen (1997). Memorizing new words: does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28(1),89–108.

Meara, Paul (1995). The Importance of early Emphasis on L2 vocabulary. The Language Teacher, 19 (2), 8-11.

Mehrpour, Saeed (2008). A Comparison of the Effects of two Vocabulary Teaching Techniques. Asian EFL Journal, 10(2),192-209.

Morin, Regina, & Goebel, Joseph, Jr. (2001). Basic vocabulary instruction: Teaching strategies or teaching words? Foreign Language Annals, 34(1),8-1 7.

Nagy, William (2005). Why Vocabulary Instruction Needs to be Long-term and Comprehensive. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to Practice (27–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Nakata, Tatsuya (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards, and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL, 20(1), 3–20.

Nation, Paul (1995). The word on words: An interview with Paul Nation. Interviewed by N. Schmitt. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, Paul and Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary Size, Text Coverage, and Word Lists. In: Schmitt, N. and McCarthy, M., (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, David (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pearson, P. David and Johnson, Dale. D. (1978). Teaching Reading Comprehension. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.

Qian, David D. (1996). ESL Vocabulary acquisition: Contextualization and Decontextualization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1),120–142.

Radwan, Adel Abu & Rikala-Boyer, J. (2011). Semantic Processing and Vocabulary Development of Adult ESL Learners. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 21, 1-21.

Randall, Mick (2007). Memory, Psychology and Second Language Learning. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rivers, Wilga M. (1981). Teaching Foreign-Language Skills (2nd Ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sagarra, Nuria and Alba, Matthew (2006). The Key Is in the Keyword: L2 Vocabulary learning methods with Beginning Learners of Spanish. Modern Language Journal. 90 (2) 228-243.

Seal, B. D. (1991). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle

Shillaw, John (1995). Using a word list as a focus for vocabulary learning. The Language Teacher, 19, 58-59.

Stahl, Steven & Vancil, Sandra J. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40(1), 62–68.

Thornbury, Scott (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Thornbury, Scott (2015). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Pearson Educated Limited.

Waring, Robert (1997). The Negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A Replication. System, 25(2), 261-274.

Waugh, N. C. and D. A. Norman (1965). "Primary Memory," Psychological Review 72: 89-104.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i5.4095

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).