AN INVESTIGATION INTO EFL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD BENEFITS OF MOODLE QUIZ-SUPPORTED LISTENING PRACTICE

Vo Van Si

Abstract


Researchers have pointed out that Moodle usage, a type of software supporting blended learning enhances learning beyond the classroom. It is proven that blended learning takes place when Moodle is employed. The aim of this study was to investigate what perceptions the EFL university students had toward the Moodle Quiz-supported listening practice. This was a descriptive research. The instrument of this study was a questionnaire developed by generating a list of factors derived from the literature to find out what perceptions EFL students at Tay Do University had toward the Moodle Quiz-supported listening practice. The questionnaire was based on close-ended five-point Likert scale statements. The findings showed that the participants held a positive perception toward the Moodle Quiz-supported listening practice as it enhanced learning outcomes, enhanced their interest/enjoyment in listening to English, promoted their independent learning, fostered a flexible learning environment, and provided authentic materials.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


EFL students, Moodle Quiz-supported listening, perception, Tay Do University

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aborisade, P. A. (2013). Blended learning in English for academic purposes courses: A Nigerian case study. In B. Tomlinson & C. Whittaker (Eds.), Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation. London British Council, UK.

Adas, D., & Shmais, W. (2011). Students' perceptions towards blended learning environment using the OCC. Annajah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities),25(6), 1681- 1710.

Al-Ani, W. T. (2013). Blended learning approach using Moodle and student’s achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), p96.

Al-Jarf, R. S. (2004). The effects of web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers. Foreign Language Annals 37/1: 46–56.

Al-Jarf, R. S. (2005). The effects of online grammar instruction on low proficiency EFL college students’ achievement. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly 7/4: 166–190.

Alnajdi, S. M. (2014). Students' perceptions toward using Jusur: A web-based learning management system for higher education in Saudi Arabia. (Doctor of Philosophy), Indiana State University.

Al-Shyukh, G. (2008). Impediments to the use of blended learning from the point of view of faculty members (Unpublished master’s thesis). College of Education, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain.

Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL Students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95-110.

Aydin, S. (2007). Attitudes of EFL learners towards the Internet, Age, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 52.

Bañados, E (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal 23/3: 533–550.

Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & López Pérez, M. V. (2014). Evaluation of a blended learning language course: students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 509-527. doi:10.1080/09588221.2013.770037.

Can, T. (2009). Learning and teaching languages online: a constructivist approach, Novitas Royal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6074.

Çetiz, İ. D. (2006). Students’ and instructor’s perceptions of a blended course: A case study (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University).

Chenoweth, N. A. & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 285314.

Choosri Banditvilai (2016). Enhancing Students’ Language Skills through Blended Learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 14 Issue 3 2016, (pp220-229).

Chou, C. C. (2010). Student perceptions and pedagogical applications of e-learning tools in online course. In Handbook of Research on Practices and Outcomes in E-Learning: Issues and Trends, eds. H. Hao Yang & S. Chi-Yin Yuen, Hershey, PA, pp. 440-454.

Collins, K. and Blake, R. M. (2007). Blended learning: embracing individualism, Chief Learning Officer, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 32-7.

Dashtestani, R. (2014). English as a foreign language teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 22.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

De Vega, C., & McAnally-Salas, L. (2010). Online Support for a Chemistry Course: The Opinion of University Freshmen (pp. 36-46). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on e-Learning, Penang, Malaysia.

De Zure, D. (2002). Learning from Change, Landmarks in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

Eydelman, N. (2013). Blended English as a Foreign Language academic writing course. In B. T. C. Whittaker (Ed.), Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation. UK: London British Council.

Ellis, A., R., Steed, F., A., & Applebee, C., A. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312-335.

Emerita, B. (2006). A Blended-learning Pedagogical Model for Teaching and Learning EFL Successfully through an Online Interactive Multimedia Environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), p-p 533-550.

Falconer, I. and Littlejohn, A. (2007). Designing for blended learning and reuse, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 41-52.

Fong, S., Ng, W., Ong, S., Hanafi, A., & Rozhan, I. (2005). Research in E-Learning in a Hybrid Environment- A Case for Blended Instruction. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 124-136.

Garrison, R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.

Georgouli, K., Skalkidis, I., & Guerreiro, P. (2008). A framework for adopting LMS to introduce e-learning in a traditional course. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 227-240.

Gimeno-Sanz, A. (2010). Intermediate online English: An attempt to increase learner autonomy. Teaching English with technology – Developing online teaching skills special issue, 10, 35-49.

Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3557.

Govender, I. (2009). The learning context: Influence on learning to program. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1218-1230.

Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

Hameed, S., Badii, A. & Cullen, A.J. (2008). Effective E-Learning Integration with Traditional Learning in a Blended Learning Environment. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information System. May 25-26.

Hamouda, A. (2013). An Investigation of Listening Comprehension Problems Encountered by Saudi Students in the EL Listening Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(2), 113-15.

Henderson, J. G. (2010). Learning through a disciplined curriculum study approach: Implications for educational leadership. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 4(4), 312-315.

Jaber Abu Shawish & Mohammad Shaath (2012). Al- Quds Open University Learners’ Attitudes towards Blended Learning (BL). Palestinian Journal of Open Education. Vol. 3/ No.6.

Ke, C., Sun, H., & Yang, Y. (2012). Effects of user and system characteristics on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the web-based classroom response system. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 128-143.

Larsen, L. J. (2012). Teacher and student perspectives on a blended learning intensive English program writing course. Graduate Theses and Dissertations: Iowa State University.

Lavooy, M. J. & Newlin, M. H. (2003). Computer mediated communication: online instruction and interactivity, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 157165.

Lee, K.W. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 6 (12).

Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for Blended e-learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Masie, E. (2002). Blended learning: the magic is in the mix, The ASTD e-learning handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mohammed, N. H. (2015). Perceptions and Attitudes towards Blended Learning for English Courses: A Case Study of Students at University of Bisha. English Language Teaching; Vol. 8, No. 9.

Mullamaa, K. (2010). ICT in language learning – benefits and methodological implications. International Education Studies, 3(1), 38-44.

Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.

Pazio, M. (2010). Blended learning and its potential in expanding vocabulary knowledge: A case study. Teaching English with Technology 10/1: 3–30.

Pearcy, A. G. (2009). Finding the perfect blend: A comparative study of online, face-to-face, and blended instruction. University of North Texas.

Perkins, M., & Pfaffman, J. (2006). Using a course management system to improve classroom communication. Science Teacher, 73(7), 33-37.

Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 9(2), pp. 271-285.

Roberson, E. B., Ladewig, B. H., Strickland, M. P., & Boschung, M. D. (1987). Enhancement of self-esteem through the use of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Education Research, 80 (5), 314-316.

Sam, H. K., Wah, T. K. & Leong, L. K. (2007) ‘Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of an online mathematical problem-solving course: a constructivist approach’, Paper presented at Proceedings of Ascilite, Singapore.

Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632- 1640. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011.

Scida, E. E. & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: a case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 517531.

Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 51-4.

Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., & Casey, D. (2012). Students' experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programs. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 464-468. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014.

Soliman, N. (2014). Using e-learning to develop EFL students’ language skills and activate their independent learning. Creative Education, vol. 5, pp. 752-757.

Tanveer, M. (2011). Integrating e-learning in classroom-based language teaching: Perceptions, challenges and strategies. Conference Proceedings, 4th International Conference ICT for Language Learning, Florence, Italy.

Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through Moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85-92. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n4p85.

Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 8.

Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M & Kioumourtzoglou, English. (2011). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance. Procedia Technology 1 (2012) 439-443.

Welker, J., & Berardino, L., (2005-2006). Blended learning: Understanding the middle ground between traditional classroom and fully online instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 33-55. Doi: 10.2190/67FX-B7P8-PYUX-TDUP.

Williams, N. A., Bland, W., & Christie, G. (2008). Improving student achievement and satisfaction by adopting a blended learning approach to inorganic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 43-50. doi: 10.1039/B801290N.

Woo, Y. & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: a social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1525.

Yang, S. C. (2001). Language learning on the world wide web: an investigation of EFL learners’ attitudes and perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 155181.

Yen, J.-C., & Lee, C.-Y. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 138-145. doi:10.1016/ j.compedu.2010.08.012.

Zygadlo, P. (2007). Computer assisted language learning: Effectiveness of vocabulary learning with the help of the authorial on-line application Catch’n’Practice v1.0. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i5.4460

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).