ASSESSING THE REPERCUSSIONS OF DICTIONARY FORMATS ON SCHOLARLY WRITING OUTCOMES: UNDERTAKING MIXED-METHOD APPROACH

Li-Wei Wei

Abstract


The complexity of foreign vocabulary and the multifaceted meanings of word combinations often pose significant challenges to language learners, potentially deterring their motivation. Dictionaries, however, serve as pivotal tools in surmounting these obstacles. Extant research has extensively explored the intersection of language acquisition and dictionary utilization, revealing a marked preference among EFL students for online or electronic dictionaries over traditional paper formats. Despite the recognized importance of dictionary use in fostering language proficiency, there remains a notable paucity of research investigating the specific impact of different dictionary formats on learners' writing skills. This study adopted a quasi-experimental between-groups design, including a control group and two experimental groups, involving a cohort of 67 Chinese EFL graduates from an international college in China. Over a ten-week experimental period, participants in the experimental groups utilized digital and paper dictionaries as reference aids for abstract writing, whereas the control group was deprived of any dictionary usage. Following the experiment, a semi-structured interview was conducted to assess the benefits of dictionary use in abstract writing and to elicit learners' perceptions of digital versus print English dictionaries. The weekly abstract writing submissions from all three groups were collected and meticulously analyzed. The findings revealed that both digital and paper dictionaries significantly enhanced the abstract writing performance of the Chinese EFL graduates in the experimental groups. Notably, participants who used digital dictionaries demonstrated a substantial and statistically significant improvement in overall abstract writing quality and language usage compared to those in the print-dictionary group. Furthermore, the study reported that digital dictionaries were particularly favored by Chinese EFL graduates due to their numerous advantageous attributes, including their reliability and efficacy in identifying appropriate linguistic expressions and vocabulary. In conclusion, the empirical evidence underscores the efficacy of digital dictionaries in augmenting the writing skills of EFL learners, suggesting a potential pedagogical shift towards the integration of digital lexicographical resources in language education curricula.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


abstract writing, EFL Chinese graduate learners, digital English dictionary, print English dictionary

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdi, R. (2017). Does dictionary use affect Iranian EFL learners’ lexical density in writing? Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 1, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2017.01.01

Abubaker, F., & El-Badri, H. A. (2022). Digital storytelling as a pedagogical approach for meaningful learning: Alternative implementations of technology in the Libyan EFL context. Taking Literature and Language Learning Online. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350268555.ch-008

Ahangari, S., & Abbasi Dogolsara, S. (2015). Comparing the effect of using monolingual versus bilingual dictionary on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. English Language Teaching, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p141

Alsmari, N. A. (2019). Fostering EFL students’ paragraph writing using Edmodo. English Language Teaching, 12(10), 44. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n10p44

Ambarwati, R., & Mandasari, B. (2020). The influence of online Cambridge dictionary toward students’ pronunciation and vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i2.605

Bestelmeyer, P. E. (2018). Linguistic ‘First Impressions’ Accents as a cue to person perception. The Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception, 666-682. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743187.013.30

Boonmoh, A. (2012). E-dictionary use under the spotlight: Students' use of pocket electronic dictionaries for writing. Lexikos, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5788/22-1-997

Cebula, K. (2018). Experimental and quasi-experimental research design in education. Building Research Design in Education. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350019539.ch-004

Chan, A. Y. W. (2011). The use of a monolingual dictionary for meaning determination advanced Cantonese ESL learners in Hong Kong. Applied Linguistics, 33, 1-27. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/lex/article/download/84822/74810

Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Rodway, C. (2021). Social strategy use in online Chinese learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880442

Chen, X., Trafimow, D., Wang, T., Tong, T., & Wang, C. (2021). The APP procedure for estimating the Cohen's effect size. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 5(3), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-08-2021-0095

Chen, T. (2014). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942

Chen, Y. (2012). Bilingualized dictionaries with special reference to the Chinese EFL context. Lexikos, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5788/22-1-1001

Chernysh, O., & Syvak, O. (2021). E-dictionary use in language acquisition. Education and Science of Today: Intersectoral Issues and Development of Sciences Volume 2. https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-19.03.2021.v2.45

Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative Methods in Psychology: A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dashtestani, R. (2013). EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the use of electronic dictionaries for learning English. CALL-EJ, 14(2), 51-65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256839251_ EFL_teachers'_and_students'_perspectives_on_the_use_of_electronic_dictionaries_for_learning_English

D’Astoli, P. (2016). The importance of learning foreign languages in today's world. Worawa College Advisory Committee. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-learning-foreign-languages-todays-world-paul-d-astoli

Davoudi, M. R. (2016). The Influence of Electronic Dictionaries on Vocabulary Knowledge Extension. Journal of Education and Learning; Vol. 5, No. 3, 139-148. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jel/article/view/58228

East, M. (2006). The impact of bilingual dictionaries on lexical sophistication and lexical accuracy in tests of L2 writing proficiency: A quantitative analysis. Assessing Writing, 11, 179-197. http://10.1016/j.asw.2006.11.001

East, M. (2023). Supporting TBLT through teacher education. TASK, Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1075/task.23004.eas

Elgort, I., Candry, S., Boutorwick, T. J., Eyckmans, J., & Brysbaert, M. (2016). Contextual word learning with form-focused and meaning-focused elaboration. Applied Linguistics, amw029. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw029

El-Sayed, N. A.-A., & Siddiek, A. G. (2014, May). Exploring the English Language Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Use of Pedagogical Dictionaries in their Classes Retrieved from International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature: http://www.journals.aiac.org.au /index.php/IJALEL /article/viewFile/1071/1001

Eriska, N. L., Khani, F. I., Khaerul, M. A, Arby, M., & Zulfa, F. I. (2022). Online application in blended learning; EFL students’ perspective. Conference on English Language Teaching, 2, 301-314. https://doi.org/10.24090/celti.v2.58

Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Gromik, N. (2017). Smartphone-based learning in the Japanese ESL classroom: A case study report. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Gotti, M. (2014). Linguistic features of legal texts: Translation issues. Statute Law Review, 37(2), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmu027

Hafsha, A. (2020). Identifying ESL learners’ use of multiple resources in vocabulary learning. https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/rk57c

Hakim, M. A., Abidin, M. J., & Bahari, A. I. (2018). Dictionary use to increase students’ vocabulary mastery: Electronic dictionary or printed one? Proceedings of the 1st Bandung English Language Teaching International Conference. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008215001500159

Healy, H. (2018). Dictionary use. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0810

Hoang, H. (2017). Researching writing processes: The case of foreign language learners' metaphor production. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473971967

Hua, T. K., & Zarei, N. (2013). The Role of Meaning Access Devices in Dictionary Use. Social Sciences & Humanities 21, 145-152.https://www.researchgate.net /publication /281791775_The_ Role_of_Meaning_Access_Devices_in_Dictionary_Use

Huang, S., & Eslami, Z. (2013). The use of dictionary and contextual guessing strategies for vocabulary learning by advanced English-language learners. English Language and Literature Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v3n3p1

Husaini, R. (2020). Student’s response in online learning process: A case study of English education students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v2i1.10127

Irhamia, I. (2021). Students’ perception and motivation towards online language learning. English Language Teaching for EFL Learners, 3(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/elties.v3i2.21888

Jacobs, G. M. (1989). Dictionaries can help writing: If students know how to use them, Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii, Department of Educational Psychology,1-15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED316025

Journal, A. W., & Aloraini, N. (2018). Investigating Instagram as an EFL learning tool. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/e3jdm

Kinkade, K. B., & Wilson, K. J. (2022). Research across the curriculum rubric (RAC-R): An adaptable rubric for the evaluation of journal article style lab reports. Trends in Teaching Experimentation in the Life Sciences, 303-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98592-9_15

Kim, J. K., & Moon, E. J. (2019). The effect of integrating reading and writing on EFL learners’ writing ability and vocabulary usage. Modern English Education, 20(3), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.18095/meeso.2019.20.3.57

Kondal, B. (2018). The benefits of using Dictionary Skills among the Third Year Pharmacy Students. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 7(11), 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330872524_The_Benefits_of_using_Dictionary_Skills_among_the_Third_Year_Pharmacy_Students

Lambert, C. (2023). Personal investment in TBLT. The Role of the Learner in Task-Based Language Teaching, 19-40. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003227267-4

Larner, A. J. (2014). Effect size (Cohen's D) of cognitive screening instruments examined in pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 4(2), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363735

Lascarides, A., & Copestake, A. (2015). The pragmatics of word meaning. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 204. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v0i0.2707

Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.

Lew, R. (2015). Research into the use of online dictionaries. International Journal of Lexicography, 28(2), 232-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecv010

Lew, R. (2016). Dictionaries for learners of English. Language Teaching, 49(2), 291–294. http://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481500049X

Leppink, J. (2019). Statistical methods for experimental research in education and psychology. Springer.

Li, L., & Xu, H. (2015). Using an online dictionary for identifying the meanings of verb phrases by Chinese EFL learners. Lexikos, 25. https://doi.org/10.5788/25-1-1295

Lütge, C. (2022). Foreign language learning in the digital age: Theory and pedagogy for developing Literacies. Routledge.

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.008

Milić, M., Glušac, T., Kardoš, A. (2018). The effectiveness of dictionary-aided teaching standardization of English-based sports terms in Serbian. Lexikos, 28, 1–25. http://doi.org/10.5788/28-1-14.65

Miyazaki, K. (2019). The effect of an online vocabulary learning tool on passive and active vocabulary use at a range of proficiency levels. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.25256/paal.23.2.5

Michel, M. (2023). Task-based language teaching TBLT. Elia, (23), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2023.i23.10

Mohamad, M., Rashid, N., & Mohamad, W. (2017). The Advantages and Disadvantages of E-Dictionaries to Enhance Vocabulary Learning of ESL Learners. The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2017. https://papers.iafor.org/submission34731/#:~:text=The% 20main%20advantages%20are%20ease,disadvantages%20is%20lack%20of%20credibility.

Nauman-Al. A., Ali. A., El-Sayed, A. G. (2013). Effective Look-up Techniques to Approach a Monolingual Dictionary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/1000

Nesi, H. (2014). Dictionary use by English language learners. Language Teaching, 47(1), 38–55. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000402

Norri, J. (2016). Dictionary of medical vocabulary in English, 1375–1550. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577081

Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of Wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753

Renkens, V., Tomar, V., & Van Hamme, H. (2016). Incrementally learn the relevance of words in a dictionary for spoken language acquisition. 2016 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT). https://doi.org/10.1109/slt.2016.7846257

Rezaei, M., & Davoudi, M. (2016). The influence of electronic dictionaries on vocabulary knowledge extension. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 139. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p139

Sabarun, K.L. (2018). Needs analysis on developing EFL paragraph writing materials at Kalimantan L2 learners. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p186

Sharma, M. (2020). Is the Print Dictionary Losing Meaning?. Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/is-the-print-dictionary-losing-meaning/story-EDtrzjZvjHIzo7QLpL54XK.html

Shaw, N. (2020). New Lockdown Words Added to the Dictionary Include Crafternoon and Oobleck.

WalesOnline. http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/new-lockdown-words-added-dictionary-18945162

Shojaei, A., & Motallebzadeh, K. (2016). Book review: English language learning and technology. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 41-43. https://doi.org/10.32959/tojelt.229309

Smith, L. (2017). Necessary knowledge: Piagetian perspectives on constructivism. Routledge.

Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2017). Dictionary use of undergraduate students in foreign language departments in Turkey at present. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12B), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051406

Thomas, M. (2017). Computer-assisted language learning. Project-Based Language Learning with Technology, 31-52. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225418-3

Töpel, A. (2014). Review of research into the use of electronic dictionaries. In Müller-Spitzer, C. (Ed.), Using online dictionaries (pp. 13–15). Walter de Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110341287.13

Truong, D. (2012). Online vs Print Dictionary. Visualgui. Retrieved from https://visualgui.com/2012/09/11/online-vs-print-dictionary/

Tulgar, A, T. (2017). Dictionary Use of Undergraduate Students in Foreign Language Departments in Turkey at Present. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12B), 51-57. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165475

Veliz, L. (2017). Enhancing ESL learners’ vocabulary learning of metaphorically-used words. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 835. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.01

Wilcox, R. (2019). A robust Nonparametric measure of effect size based on an analog of Cohen's D, plus inferences about the median of the typical difference. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1551905677

Yükselir, C. (2016). English Foreign Language (EFL) Instructors’ and Teachers’ Perceptions towards the Integration of Internet Assisted Language Teaching (IALT) into EFL Instruction. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 23-30, online ISSN 1803-1617, printed ISSN 2336-2375. https://doi:10.7160/eriesj. 2016.090104

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and performance. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch1




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i4.5542

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).