Hatice Okyar, Gonca Yangın Ekşi


This study compared the effectiveness of negative evidence and enriched input on learning the verb-noun collocations. There were 52 English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners in this research study and they were randomly assigned to the negative evidence or enriched input groups. While the negative evidence group (n=27) was provided with instruction about what was not acceptable for verb-noun collocation structure, the enriched input group (n=25) was exposed to the target verb-noun collocations many times without any instruction or feedback. In order to determine the effects of the implementation, pre- and post- form recognition tests and pre-and post-production tests were administered to the participants. Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples and Mann Whitney U tests were conducted since the data did not meet normality assumptions. The Wilcoxon test results indicated that the negative evidence group achieved significant improvement in both their recognition and production test results. As for the enriched input group, the students presented a considerable improvement in terms of the production test; however, their performance was not very significant on the recognition test results. To compare both groups, Mann Whitney U test was run and it was evident that both the negative evidence and enriched input groups had positive effects on the production of verb-noun collocations. On the other hand, the form recognition test results revealed that the negative evidence group outperformed the enriched input group. 


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



negative evidence, enriched input, verb-noun collocations


Abolhasanpour, F. & Jabbari, A. A. (2014). The effect of negative and positive evidence on acquisition of quantifiers by Iranian EFL. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 46-62.

Aksu, İ. (2008). Let’s go. In D. Köksal (Ed.) Campus life teacher’s book A1 (pp. 106-111). Ankara: Nobel Basımevi.

Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. New York: Longman.

Chan, T. P. & Liou, H. C. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students’ learning of verb-noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 231-251.

Doughty C. & Williams J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.), Focus-on-form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (1991). Grammar teaching-practice or consciousness-raising? In R. Ellis (Ed.), Second language acquisition and second language pedagogy (pp. 232-241). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis, pp. 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell.

8. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gass, S. M., Behney, J. & Plonsky, L. (2013) Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Gass, S. M. & Houck, N. (1999). Interlanguage refusals: A cross-cultural study of Japanese-English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. The Modern Language Journal, 64, 216-221.

Hernandez, T.A. (2008). The effect of explicit instruction and input flood on students’ use of discourse markers on a simulated oral proficiency interview. Hispania, 91, 665-75.

Hernandez, T.A. (2011). Reexamining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 159-182.

Hill, J. (1999). Collocational competence. ETP (English Teaching Professional), Issue 11.

Hill, J. (2000). Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further development in the lexical approach (pp. 47-69). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Izumi, S. & Lakshmanan, U. (1998). Learnability, negative evidence, and the L2 acquisition of the English passive. Second Language Research, 14(1), 62–101.

Jiang, L. & Yi, H. (2014). The effect of positive evidence and negative feedback on EFL learners' acquisition of the third person singular form. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(6), 124-133.

Krashen, S. (1991). The input hypothesis: An update. In J.E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 409-431). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching collocations: Further development in the Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Long, M. H. (1996). The Role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.

Mahvelati, E. H. & Mukundan, J. (2012). The effects of input flood and consciousness-raising approach on collocation knowledge development of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature,1(6), 182-192.

Methold, K. & Jones, H. (1998). New century readings (Level 1): A graded comprehension course. Turkey: Taş Kitapçılık.

Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.) London: Arnold.

Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24 (2), 223–242.

Oxford collocations dictionary for students of English (2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pica, T. (2009). Integrating content-based and task-based approaches for teaching, learning and research. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics: language teaching and learning: Volume 1 (pp. 75-98). New York: Continuum.

Phoocharoensil, S. (2011). Collocational errors in EFL learners’ interlanguage. Journal of Education and Practice, 2(3), 103- 120

Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reinders, H. (2010). The effect of task type and instructions on second language acquisition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Reinders, H. & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis et al. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 281‐302). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Saxton, M. (2000). Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. First Language, 20(2), 221–252.

Schachter, J. (1991). Corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research, 7, 89-102.

Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. K. Bhatt & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characterisctics and foreign language education (pp. 27–50). Boston, MA: De Gruyter.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Singleton, D. (2000). Language and lexicon: An introduction. London: Arnold.

Strange, D. & Hall, D. (2000). Pacesetter student’s book (starter). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strange, D. & Hall, D. (2000). Pacesetter student’s book (elementary). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strange, D. & Hall, D. (2000). Pacesetter student’s book (pre-intermediate). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Topkaya, E. Z. (2008). I feel terrible. In D. Köksal (Ed.), Campus life teacher’s book A1 (pp. 118-123). Ankara: Nobel Basımevi.

Trahey, M. & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181–204.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v0i0.965


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).