Zeynep Çetin Köroğlu, Abdulvahit Çakır


Flipped instruction reinforces the idea that learning cannot be limited to classrooms. Flipped instruction is a new way of teaching for language pedagogy as other fields. Thus, the present research aimed to find out student teachers’ perspectives about flipped instruction and flipped instruction based syllabus which was designed specifically for speaking skills development. The current study was utilized qualitative method to collect the data. Structured written interview technique and student teachers’ response papers were used to collect student teachers’ perspectives about flipped instruction and flipped instruction based Oral Communication Skills I course. The participants were Pre-service English Language Teaching Department student teachers who were first graders of ELT department at Gazi University, Turkey. Participants consisted of 23 students who were 20 female and 3 male student teachers. Results showed that student teachers had positive attitudes towards flipped instruction, which was quite new for the student teachers. The results indicated that student teachers were satisfied with flipped instruction and flipped syllabus which was specifically designed for the course. Besides, student teachers thought that flipped instruction was effective to make them prepared for the lesson and speaking activities which are carried out in class times. 


Article visualizations:

Hit counter



flipped instruction, speaking skills, English language teaching, blended learning, student teachers


Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class everyday. Alexandria, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.

Burns, A. (2012). A holistic approach to teaching speaking in the language classroom. Paper presented at Linguistic Symposium, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.

Chaney, A. L., & Burke, T. L. (1998). Teaching oral communication in grades K-8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Demirel, Ö. (2004). Yabancı Dil Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Egan, K. B. (1999). Speaking: A critical skill and a challenge. CALICO Journal, 16, 277-293.

Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the Flipped Classroom Model of instruction on Undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.

Fulton, K. (2013). Byron’s flipped classrooms. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from:

Hamdan, N., Mcknight, P., Mcknight, K., & Arfstrom, K. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Pearson and George Mason. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from:

Jhonson, B. G. (2013). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Master of Arts Thesis, The college of Graduate Studies of The University of British Columbia, Okanagan.

Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859–75.

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.

Lambert, C. (2013). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine, 23-27.

Özkan, M. (2011). Effects of Social Constructivist Virtual Learning Environments on Speaking Skills from the Perspective of University Students. Unpublished Master of Arts Thesis, Institute of educational sciences of Çukurova University, Adana.

Ozsevik, Z. (2010). The use of communicative language teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL teachers’ perceived difficulties in implementing CLT in Turkey. Master of Arts Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

Paker, T. (2012). Türkiye’de Neden Yabancı Dil (İngilizce) Öğretemiyoruz ve Neden Öğrencilerimiz İletişim Kurabilecek Düzeyde İngilizce Öğrenemiyor? Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,32, 89-94.

Ryan, B. (2013). Flipping over: Student-centered learning and assessment. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 1(2), 30-39.

Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: developing adult EFL students’ speaking abilities. In Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching - An anthology of current practices (pp. 201-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Retrieved April 13 2015from:

Strayer, J. (2007). The Effects of the classroom Flip on the Learning Environment: a comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, Ohio.

Tétreault, L. P. (2006). The Flipped Classroom: Cultivating Student Engagement. Master of Arts Thesis, Simon Fraser University.

Ullman, E. (2013). Tips and tools for the flipped classroom. Retrieved May 11, 2015 from:

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and Society (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Yılmaz, Yakışık, B. (2012). Dynamic assessment of ELT students' speaking skills. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of educational sciences of Gazi University, Ankara.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2015 - 2023. European Journal of English Language Teaching (ISSN 2501-7136) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).