INTERROGATING THE CONCEPT ‘OPENNESS’ IN OPEN DISTANCE LEARNING (ODL)

Cosmas Maphosa, Sithulisiwe Bhebhe

Abstract


Scholars in Open Distance Learning (ODL) often refer to distance education as ‘open’. The concept 'openness' on open and distance learning is very fluid and often misunderstood. It is the purpose of this desktop survey to review relevant literature and make interrogation of the concept 'openness'. We advance questions such as; How open is open and distance learning. In what aspects is ODL open and to what extent is the openness. We discuss openness concerning targeted potential students and entry requirements in ODL institutions, the openness of teaching, and learning approaches as well as openness concerning communication, the flexibility of curricula, and assessment. We conclude by answering whether or not ODL institutions are open as well as suggesting measures and ways of enhancing openness in ODL institutions.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


Keywords


open learning, distance education, curriculum flexibility, learning, distance learners, open education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aftab, J. Sarwar, H. Khan, A. H. & Kiran, A. (2019). Critical Factors Which Impact on Students’ Satisfaction. A Study of e-learning Institutes of Pakistan. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2), 32-46.

Afunde, N. L. (2016). The Potential of Open and Distance Learning in Enhancing the Provision of Psychosocial Support: A Case Study at NAMCOL Paper ID: 00559. http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2618/PDF?sequence=4&isAllowed=y (Accessed 11 April 2020).

Ahmad I. A, Nik A. N. Y. & Kamariah M. N. (2014). A Comparative Study on Persistency and Performance of Flexible and Normal Entry Learners, Seminar Kebangsaan Pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat

Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12 (3), 80 – 97

Balaji, M. S. (2010). Student interactivity in online discussion forum: Empirical research from a “media richness theory” perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1- 22.

Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-Learning and Distance Education London: Routledge

Berge, Z. L. (2013). Barriers to Communication in Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14 (1) Article 31.

Bordoloi, T. (2018). Transforming and empowering higher education through Open and Distance Learning in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13 (1), 24-36.

Carmo, R. D. S. & Franco, A. P. (2019). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: the learning of university teachers in distance education. Educação em Revista. 35 (1), 1-12.

Chaudhary, S. V. S. & Dey, N. (2013). Assessment in Open and Distance Learning System (ODL): A Challenge. Open Praxis, 5 (3), 207–216.

CQ University Australia (2020). Mixed Mode. https://www.cqu.edu.au/about-us/structure/governance/glossary/items/mixed-mode (Accessed 26 April 2020).

Dalsgaard, C. & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16 (6), 78 – 96.

Downes, S. (2007, June). An introduction to connective knowledge. Paper presented at the International Conference on Media, knowledge & education—exploring new spaces, relations, and dynamics in digital media ecologies. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/33034.

Ekstrand, B. (2013). Prerequisites for persistence in distance education. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter164/ekstrand164.html (Accessed 12 April 2020).

Fahy, P.J. (2003). Indicators of support in online interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/129.

Gil-Jaurena, I. (2013). Challenges, lessons, and achievements in the practice of distance and e-learning. https://openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/article/view/82/51 (accessed 27 April 2020).

Innovative learning solutions, (2020). An Introduction to Blended Learning. https://www.cae.net/blended-learning-introduction/ (Accessed 14 April 2020).

Jain, S. (2013). Enabling continued adult-learning through open and distance learning (Unpublished paper).

Katz, Y. J. (2002). Attitudes are affecting college students’ preferences for distance learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 2–9.

Keegan, D. (Ed.) (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Khakhar, D. (2001). A framework for open distance learning — organization and management, Retrieved from https://portlandpress.com/DocumentLibrary/Umbrella/Wenner%20Gren/Vol%2079/vu_ch3.pdf.

Khumalo, (2018). Improving Student Success Rate in Open Distance Learning settings through the principle of constructive alignment. https://www.intechopen.com/books/trends-in-e-learning/improving-student-success-rate-in-open-distance-learning-settings-through-the-principle-of-construct (Accessed 14 April 2020).

Killian, B. (2012). NAMCOL assessment manual. Windhoek: NAMCOL.

Kuruppuarachchi K. A. J. M. & Karunanayake, K. O. L. C. (2017). Student characteristics and knowledge on ODL concepts at first registration: A case study from OUSL. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12 (1), 41-51 DOI 10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2016-0004.

Latif, L. A., Fadzil, M. & Yick, L. K. S. (2009). Persistence and Performance: Does Prior Learning Really Matter? ICI9 - International Conference on Information; Kuala Lumpur, 12 – 13 August 2009.

Latchem, C. (2018). Open and Distance Non-formal Education in Developing Countries. https://books.google.com/books?id=dtBJDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq (Accessed 26 April 2020).

Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitude towards e-learning. Computers Education, 49(4), 1066–1080.

Littlejohn, A. & Pegler, C. (2014). Reusing Resources: Open for Learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(2).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2014-02.

Maboe, K. A. (2017). Use of online interactive tools in an open distance learning context: Health studies students’ perspective. Health South Africa Gesondheid, 2 (2), 221-227

Mahlangu, V. P. (2017). Professional Development of Adult Learners through Open and Distance Learning http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68818 (Accessed 14 April 2020).

Mariluz, C. Covadonga, R. Gorka, L. & Alicia, O. (2006). Open and Distance Learning Methodologies in Higher Education Spanish National Distance University (UNED-Spain). EADTU’s Annual Conference. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494776.pdf.

McAndrew, P. (2010). Defining openness: updating the concept of" open" for a connected world. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, Article 10.

McKerlich, R., & Anderson, T. (2007). Community of inquiry and learning in immersive environments 11(4). Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(4). Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v11n4/index.asp.

Meier, E. (2007). Education is a right not a favour. Commonwealth Education Partnerships.https://books.google.com/books?id=ID5XqeV4q10C&pg=PT97&lpg=PT97&dq. (Accessed 26 April 2020).

Mishra, S. (2012). Openness in Education: Some Reflections on MOOCs, OERs, and ODL. Keynote Presentation. International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE). Standing Conference of Presidents (SCOP). http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/1038/2012 (Accessed 26 April 2020).

Moore, M. (1991). Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1-8.

Moore, M. G. & Anderson, W.G. (2007). Handbook of Distance Education. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: a systems view of online learning Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Musingafi, M. C. C. Mapuranga, B. Chiwanza, K. & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for Open and Distance learning (ODL) Students: Experiences from Students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (18), 59-67.

Naidu, S. (2017). Openness and flexibility are the norms, but what are the challenges? http://repository.usp.ac.fj/10851/ (Accessed 27 April 2020).

NAMCOL. (2016). Annual Report. Windhoek: NAMCOL.

Ngara, R., Ngwarai R., and Mhute, I. (2012). Assessment in ODL: Practices, Opportunities, and Challenges. International J. Soc. Sci. & Education, 3 (1), 166-177.

Nigam, A. & Joshi, V. (2007). Science education through open and distance learning at higher education level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8 (4), 20-33.

Ofole, N. M. (2018). Curbing attrition rate in Open and Distance Education in Nigeria: e-counseling as a panacea. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Ojo, O. D., Ogidan, R. & Olakulehin F. K. (2006). Cost-Effectiveness of Open and Distance Learning in Nigeria: Responses from Focus Group Discussions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9 (2), 2 – 11.

Ozkan, S. & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285-1296.

Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688

Rupande, G. & Nyenya T. (2014). Accessibility and Affordability of ODL in Zimbabwe: A Reality or a Myth? International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1 (4), 21-29.

Selvaras, J. (2019). Technology usage for teaching and learning law in open and distance

learning: a Sri Lankan perspective. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2414-6994.htm (Accessed 13 April 2020).

Severiens, S., Wolff, R., & Van Herpen, S. (2014). Teaching for diversity: a literature overview and an analysis of the curriculum of a teacher training college. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2013.845166.

Sharma, R. C. Kawachi, P. & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Exploring Changing Perspectives in Distance Education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14 (1), 1 – 6.

Shin, N. (2003). Transactional Presence as a Critical Predictor of Success in Distance Learning. Distance Education, 24, 69-86.

Siemens, G. (2005). A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2(1), 3–10.

Singh, L. & Das, M. (2019). Using Innovative Measures for Enhancing Quality in the ODL System in India. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14 (1), 117 – 127

Schophuizen, M. (2020). What is Openness in Open Education? https://frankounl.wordpress.com/2014/12/24/ (Accessed 26 April 2020).

Srivastava, M., Kurup, J. M., and Nembiakkim, R. (2007). Reaching out to the un-reached through ODL: role of IGNOU in the North East Region. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 16 (2).

Tait, A. (2000). Planning Student Support for Open and Distance Teaching, Open Learning, 15(3), pp.287-299.

Tomei, L. (2008). Online and distance learning, concepts, methodologies tools, and applications. New York: Information Science.

Trindade, A. R. Carmo, H. Bidarra, J. (2000). Current Developments and Best Practice in Open and Distance Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1-25.

Turow, J. (2016). Media today: Mass Communication in a Converging World. https://books.google.com/books?id=4CQlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA377&lpg=PA377&dq.

UNESCO (2015), http://www.unesco.org/en/efa.

UNESCO (2002). Open and Distance Learning – Trends, Policy and Strategy Considerations, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

University of South Africa (UNISA) (2008). Open distance learning policy. Pretoria: UNISA.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3282

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2016-2023. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).