Luu Nguyen Quoc Hung


Online learning has experienced rapid growth recently, particularly due to many schools’ closures because of the Covid-19 pandemic. As online learning is growing, institutions have become more interested in knowing what factors influence learners’ satisfaction in online learning environments. This becomes more important for them when the results of studies show lower retention in online courses than in face-to-face traditional courses. Although there is surprisingly little research empirically linking student satisfaction to retention, it is generally believed that there is indeed a positive relationship between the two. The current study was undertaken with 164 online learners at a center of foreign languages in Vietnam. An online survey was administered to assess the participants’ level of satisfaction with their online learning through the four main areas or groups of factors such as course content, teachers, online learning facilities and online learning support. The results revealed that the four groups are significantly associated with learners’ overall satisfaction with online learning, and there is positive retention rate during the program.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter


online learning, retention, satisfaction, strategies

Full Text:



Absah Y, Karina B, Harahap H, 2021. Strategies to improve student satisfaction through the quality of online learning facilities and infrastructure, characteristics of academic staff, lecturers competence, and good university governance in Medan. Sys Rev Pharm 12: 671-675.

Akanbi A, 2020. Availability and utilization of e-learning facilities in the teaching of Senior School Physics in Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Learning 14: 331-337. doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.16342

Barbara E, Clara M, Linder-Vanberschot A, 2013. Factors influencing student satisfaction and perceived learning in online courses. E-Learning and Digital Media 10: 226-235.

Boston E, Ice P, Gibson M, 2011. Comprehensive assessment of student retention in online learning environments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 14. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring141/boston_ice_gibson141.html

Brown M, Keppel, M, Hughes H, Hard N, Smith L, 2013. Exploring the disconnections: Student interaction with support services upon commencement of distance education. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 4: 63-74. doi: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v4i2.171

Dixson D, 2010. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10: 1-13.

Dziuban C, Moskal P, Kramer L, Thompson J, 2013. Student satisfaction with online learning in the presence of ambivalence: Looking for the will-o’-the-wisp. Internet and Higher Education 17: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.08.001

Hagedorn L, 2006. How to define retention: A new look at an old problem. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED493674

Hockly N, Dudeney G, 2018. Current and future digital trends in ELT. RELC Journal 49: 164-178. doi: 10.1177/0033688218777318

Huang Q, 2018. Examining teachers’ roles in online learning. The EuroCALL Review 26: 3-18. doi: 10.4995/eurocall.2018.9139

Huang K, Wang T, (2012. An Analysis of university freshman students’ satisfaction in using on-line English practice exams. Journal of Global Business Management 8: 88-97.

Ilynykh S, 2020. Online education: Trends and risks of digital technologies. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 527. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125954944.pdf

Karacaoglu C, 2018. Curriculum evaluation in online education: The case of teacher candidates preparing online for public personnel selection examination. International Journal of Higher Education 7. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v7n2p107

Khan J, Iqbal J, 2016. Relationship between student satisfaction and academic achievement in distance education: A case study of AIOU Islamabad. FWU Journal of Social Sciences 10: 137-145.

Lee Y, Cho, J, 2011. A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Education Tech Research Dev 59: 593-618.

Mayasari I, Kemal I, 2020. The role of teachers in implementing distance learning in the middle of the covid-19 plague. Sys Rev Pharm 11: 1553-1557.

McCloughlin C, Marchall L, 2000. Scaffolding: A Model for learner support in an online teaching environment. In A. Herrmann and M. M. Kulski (Eds), Flexible Futures in Tertiary Teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2-4 February 2000, Perth: Curtain University of Technology.

Nawaz A, Qureshi A, 2010. Sustained technical support: Issue and prospects for e-learning in Heis. Global Journal of Management and Business Research 10: 32-39.

Online Statistics, 2021. Online learning statistics in 2021. Retrieved from https://www.guru99.com/online-learning-statistics.html

Pham T, Do H, Tran T, 2021. Factors affecting online teachers’ satisfaction amid the Covid-19 pandemic. VNU Journal of Science: Educational Research 37: 22-39.

Stewart L, Goodson E, Miertschin L, Norwood L, Ezel, S, 2013. Online student support services: A case based on quality frameworks. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9: 290-303.

Wu H, Tennyson D, Hsia L, 2010. A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers and Education 55: 155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v6i2.3936


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2016-2023. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies (ISSN 2501-9120) is a registered trademark of Open Access Publishing GroupAll rights reserved.

This journal is a serial publication uniquely identified by an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) serial number certificate issued by Romanian National Library (Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei). All the research works are uniquely identified by a CrossRef DOI digital object identifier supplied by indexing and repository platforms.

All the research works published on this journal are meeting the Open Access Publishing requirements and can be freely accessed, shared, modified, distributed and used in educational, commercial and non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).